One of the most grown-up review sites around

54,416 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Some items
to consider


paid for

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

100th birthday of Mieczyslaw Weinberg on December 8, 2019.
Renate Eggbrecht has recorded all 3 violin Sonatas
All Troubadisc reviews

FOGHORN Classics

Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews

All HDTT reviews

Clarissa Bevilacqua plays
Augusta Read Thomas

all Nimbus reviews

Brahms Dvorak
Brahms 2 Dvorak 7
all tudor reviews



Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger


Discs for review may be sent to:
Jonathan Woolf
76 Lushes Road
Essex IG10 3QB
United Kingdom



Advertising on

Donate and keep us afloat


New Releases

Naxos Classical
All Naxos reviews

Chandos recordings
All Chandos reviews

Hyperion recordings
All Hyperion reviews

Foghorn recordings
All Foghorn reviews

Troubadisc recordings
All Troubadisc reviews

all cpo reviews

Divine Art recordings
Click to see New Releases
Get 10% off using code musicweb10
All Divine Art reviews

All APR reviews

Lyrita recordings
All Lyrita Reviews


Wyastone New Releases
Obtain 10% discount

Recordings of the Month

November 2022
Bach Orchestral Suites

del Cinque
Del Cinque Cello sonatas

Fujita Mozart
Mao Fujita Mozart

Stanczyk Acousmatic Music


October 2022

Berg Violin Concerto
Violin Concerto Elmes

DEbussy Jeux
Debussy Jeux

Romantic pioano masters
Romantic Piano Masters

The future is female - Vol 2
Volume 2 - The Dance

impromptu harp music
Complete Harp Impromptus



CD, Download & Sound Samples: Pristine

Johannes BRAHMS (1833-1897)
Symphony No. 4 in E minor, op. 98 (1885) [39:35]
Wolfgang Amadeus MOZART (1756-1791)
Symphony No. 39 in E flat major, K543 (1788) [25:19]
London Symphony Orchestra/Josef Krips
rec. Kingsway Hall, London 17, 19, 20 April 1950 (Brahms), 18 December 1951 (Mozart). ADD

Experience Classicsonline

Listening to this Brahms Symphony 4 I was struck how cleverly constructed it is to defy expectation. For instance, the first movement second theme (tr. 1 1:28) starts with what seems just a fanfare introduction to a broad theme on the cellos, but it’s that introduction that gets explored and becomes more powerful late in the exposition and still more in the development. Then what sounds as though it’s going to be a repeat of the exposition (3:53) turns out to be the start of the development. And the recapitulation (6:35) begins in slow, philosophic fashion before picking up exposition speed.
The transparency of Josef Krips’ classical, objective performance makes all this clear. It comes across lyrically and freshly with no special luxuriating. A good example (from 5:49) is the clarinets’ duet. It’s in brief alternation with the oboes followed by that sequence of 16 chords alternating between strings and wind headed by and surveying the beginning of the second half of the first theme. Krips presents this with an admirable coolness and appreciation of its progression. You won’t hear this passage better done anywhere. Later he allows himself just one extravagance: an acceleration from 10:25 in the coda which I find entirely acceptable because it ensures it is thrilling, as it should be.
So are there any drawbacks? The sound is clear but very bright which makes the violins rather glassy in upper register, the oboes acidic. The bass is correspondingly dry. The timpani is almost inaudible - a pity in the 4 ff crotchet beats at the very end of the movement, the only articulated beats at that point. This is a bit hypercritical for a 1950 recording but I say it so your expectations regarding recording quality will be realistic. This transfer still has more clarity, presence and impact than those of the contemporary recordings I compare below. And you can sample the entire first movement for yourself on the Pristine Audio website.
I compared the 1951 New York Philharmonic/Bruno Walter (IDIS 6392/93). I cite this because it’s currently available. You can also hear it in cleaner sound on Sony France 5081732 from the original masters; sadly no longer available. Here are the comparative timings:


Walter’s performance is, in the main, more measured, more full-blooded, romantic and dramatized. The opening has a crestfallen cast, the second theme is starchier. Walter makes more of the mysterious elements, in particular the strings’ semiquaver rustlings which are generally contrasted with the martial aspect of the second theme.
Krips’ refusal to gild the lily is again apparent in the slow movement (tr. 2) with a second theme which is an ingenious, broader, higher register idealized version on violins (2:40) of the opening of a first theme they have only hitherto played pizzicato. It too transforms into something more vigorous to allow a greater contrast for the even broader and, in Krips’ hands, calmer third theme (3:40) on the cellos delicately embellished by the first violins. Krips starts the development (5:48) with dreamier strings cleanly offset by more alert woodwind. The crown of the movement is the return of the third theme on full strings which Krips makes serene, stately and dignified.
Walter’s slow movement is more ruminative and savoured. As a result the second theme doesn’t evolve naturally from the first as it does with Krips, nor does it progress as naturally. Walter’s third theme, however, is beautifully rich and suddenly freer in flow but its return is glutinous.
Krips’ scherzo (tr. 3) opens a mite formally. Its reprise is much better with a graceful second theme (0:54), just as marked and a warm and rosy central interlude. Piccolo, triangle and a third kettledrum, all added for this movement, are clearly evident with the timpani focus much improved. Walter’s scherzo opens in a rather heavy-handed manner. It too improves after the reprise but his slow treatment of the second theme is mannered.
The thirty variations of the passacaglia theme which make up the finale (tr. 4) are presented starkly and clearly by Krips. Notable is the jagged outline in Variation 4 of the first entry of the violins and violas not playing pizzicato (1:03). I would also highlight the creamy yet also relatively dispassionate flute solo in Variation 12 (3:14), the woodwind sympathizing in Variation 13 (3:53) and the trombones adding their comforting weight in Variation 14 (4:30). The woodwind confirm the E major sunlight of these last three variations in Variation 15 (5:01) before we are back to stark reality in E minor and Variation 16 (5:38). For me, in the alternating strings and woodwind of Variation 19 (7:18) Krips is a touch too laid back but his coda (8:56) displays due increase of tension.
Walter’s finale is darker-hued and heavier. His slower approach lumbers and is over-rhetorical, though powerful and more sonorous than Krips in the later variations. Walter’s flute solo is a distraught, insistent lament, his trombones’ variation more grave.
Krips’ Mozart Symphony 39 makes a generous but not for me as striking a bonus. The Adagio introduction to the first movement (tr. 5) is spacious but also rather marmoreal and shapeless; its strong climax lacks real tension. The Allegro main body has more grace in its opening and panache in its tuttis. I compared the 1949 recording by the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra/Herbert von Karajan (EMI 4768762). Here are the comparative timings:

Karajan’s imposing introduction is slower than Krips’ (2:58 against 2:42) yet more successful because of its sense of direction, shape and tension. His Allegro opening appears much lighter and, if his tuttis have a touch more verve than Krips’, that might be because the timpani focus (here we go again) of EMI’s recording is better. In one respect, however, I prefer Krips: his violins’ slithering semiquaver cascades are more cleanly articulated, not so much thrown off as those of Karajan.
In the slow movement (tr. 6) Krips dances neatly, but I felt rather cautiously. His determination and direction are reserved for what are its darkly contrasted yet transitional passages in F minor, the first at 1:47. Moreover, in the opening section intonation is a bit dodgy. Karajan, on the other hand, offers sweetness of violin tone, lovingly shaped and moulded phrases. Everything is fitted beautifully into place, while incorporating dramatic passages in F minor.
Krips makes the Minuet elegant and lilting, if rather more at a leisurely Andante than the marked Allegretto. His Trio is blithe. Karajan’s Minuet has more impetus and with it majesty, though less relaxation than Krips. His Trio is more mellifluous. Krips’ finale is scintillating in its rigorous articulation, though the recording of the strings is again somewhat glassy. Karajan here is faster yet lighter and more frolicsome, less effortful.
In sum, a refreshing, classical Brahms 4 but a somewhat uneven Mozart 39.
Michael Greenhalgh  





















Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.