Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider

 


Enjoy the Gothenburg Symphony Orchestra wherever you are. App available for iOS and Android


Tudor 7188


Vaughan Williams Symphony 3 etc.


Lyrita New Recording


Lyrita Premiere Recordings

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage

Lyrita 4CDs £16 incl.postage


Decca Phase 4 - 40CDs


Judith Bailey, George Lloyd


BAX Orchestral pieces


CASKEN Violin Concerto

Schumann Symphonies Rattle


Complete Brahms
Bargain price

 

 

 

 


 
REVIEW



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on
Musicweb


Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Hyperion

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Alto
Arcodiva
Atoll
CDAccord
Cameo Classics
Centaur
Hallé
Hortus
Lyrita
Nimbus
Northern Flowers
Redcliffe
Sheva
Talent
Toccata Classics


Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing
sample
 

alternatively
CD: AmazonUK AmazonUS
Download: Classicsonline


Johannes BRAHMS (1833-1897)
Clarinet Trio in A minor Op.114 [24:36]
Piano Quartet No.2 in A Op.26 [49:01]
The Nash Ensemble (Ian Brown (piano); Richard Hosford (clarinet); Marianne Thorsen (violin); Lawrence Power (viola); Paul Watkins (cello))
rec. Menuhin Hall, Menuhin School, Cobham, Surrey, 13, 15, 16 July 2009. Stereo. DDD
ONYX CLASSICS ONYX 4045 [73:46]

Experience Classicsonline



 
This is an impressive addition to the Nash Ensemble’s growing catalogue of Brahms recordings. And as with their recording of the String Sextets, and of the First and Third Piano Quartets, a real sense of collective endeavour permeates these performances. You really get the impression that the works are being played as chamber music: passionate without being histrionic, precisely coordinated but with freely expressive solo lines, and balanced to give each player equal prominence.
 
The scoring of the Clarinet Trio – clarinet, cello, piano – helps to delineate each of the voices, and in this work it is to the credit of the players and the sound engineers alike that so much coherency is achieved in the ensemble. All three players come across with a warm yet focused tone. The democracy of the Nash Ensemble’s approach is demonstrated by the fact that the clarinet never seems to dominate as a solo instrument. Again, this may in part be due to the sound engineering and the way that the upper register of the piano has a roundness of tone that perfectly complements the clarinet’s sound. Dynamic and tempo markings are observed but never exaggerated, the poco F at the opening for example, is interpreted as an indication of clarity of tone and phrasing rather than an actual loud dynamic, thereby retaining a sense of mystery for this slow introduction.
 
The louder passages in the opening movements of both works demonstrate the extraordinary facility the Nash Ensemble has for presenting chamber music as chamber music. Brahms cranks up the tension, and the volume, but the players never let the music’s intimacy suffer. All the passion is there, but there is never any danger excess. Surprise dynamic jumps in the finale of the Clarinet Trio are another case in point; each sF jumps out of the texture, but never to the extent of disrupting the music’s lyrical continuity.
 
Fine balance and close communication between the players also characterise the Nash Ensemble’s reading of the Second Piano Quartet. So there is never any danger of the piano competing with the strings. As in the Clarinet Trio, the roundness of the piano tone really helps it to integrate into the texture of the other instruments. And yet despite that integration, the sound of each of the instruments is always clearly audible. I’m particularly impressed by the sound of the cello in the mix. It’s not a particularly bottom-heavy balance, but the cello really sings.
 
Perhaps these performances are a little too sophisticated? Is there enough rustic charm in the scherzos? Enough drama to engage in the Allegros? Well, from where I’m sitting they gauge it just right. True enough, I would probably be just as content with a reading that was a little more boisterous, provided it retained the same balance and ensemble. But, as I say, this is chamber music played as chamber music. Intimacy and immediacy are the guiding principles here, from the communication between the players to the clarity and warmth of the sound engineering.
 
Gavin Dixon
 

BLIND REVIEW
The reviewer had no information other than the titles of the works
 
Brahms Clarinet Trio in A minor Op. 114 & Piano Quartet No. 2 in A major Op. 26
 
Problems of balance for performers and recording engineers abound in Brahms’ chamber music with piano so that I approached this disc with some caution. In the event this was wholly unnecessary as in both works what you see in the score is what you hear, without recourse to the usually needed powers of imagination in more heavily scored passages. This is an essential prerequisite for any satisfactory performance of either work and both performances pass this test with ease.
 
The Clarinet Trio is perhaps slightly the less satisfactory of the two performances in this respect, with all three instruments fairly closely balanced, the clarinet marginally too prominent and the cello somewhat set back. This is however by no means sufficient to spoil enjoyment, simply to point out that it sounds at times as though the listener is in the room with the players with the clarinetist close by, the cellist further away and the piano lid closed. This is probably a wholly inaccurate description of the arrangement in the recording studio but it is the way the results sounds to me. The sound in general is warm but intimate, both clarinet and cello having a warm tone without exaggerated vibrato. It is surely due to the players rather than the engineers that the performance is not over-projected as it might be in a large concert hall. It sounds as though the players are playing to and with each other for sheer pleasure rather than making points to an audience. Speeds throughout are well chosen with a delightful lilt to the trio of the third movement. They are not inflexible but neither are they varied in a self indulgent manner. All in all the performance catches the autumnal feeling of the music without ever wallowing in it.
 
The recording of the earlier Piano Quartet is somewhat shallower than that of the Trio but this suits the more classical feeling of both the work and the performance. There is no sense that ff passages, for instance in the development section of the first movement, are being held back Again the balance works very well with all four instruments being heard clearly and without confusion – no mean feat in this work. Although phrasing is idiomatic and never self-consciously restrained there is a delightfully understated feeling for much of the time. Rhythms are allowed to bounce where called for, and speeds are not too fast to allow the music to breathe. The coda to the first movement is played with great beauty, and there are magical half-tones in the last movement. I could go on like this, but essentially this is an impressive and enjoyable performance of a work too little played in public and therefore more welcome on record.
 
I have no idea who the performers are in either work or when they were recorded (although I suspect that the Quartet is the older recording) but both recordings are clearly by players and engineers who grasp the essential qualities and needs of the works in hand.
 

John Sheppard

 


EXPLORE MUSICWEB INTERNATIONAL

Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews

 

Discographies
   Composer
      Composer surveys
   National
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
.
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

Interviews
With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site

Nostalgia

Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Comment
Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure

Announcements

 

Community
Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Reviewers
Pat and present

Helpers invited!

Resources
How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips


Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Publishers
Other links
Newsgroups
Web News sites etc

PotPourri
A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Questionnaire    
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Dictionary
Magazines
Newsfeed  
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools






Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.