Back in 2002, Naxos 
                bundled together a very handy 5 CD box 
                of Elgar's orchestral music, which Rob 
                Barnett praised in these 
                pages. Now, in the composer's sesquicentenary 
                year, Naxos is offering this slimmer 
                commemorative box set of just the symphonies. 
                Both of them? All three. The individual 
                discs appear exactly as they do when 
                purchased separately, with the three 
                standard jewel cases housed in a cardboard 
                slipcase that features a wistful looking 
                Elgar behind his trademark moustache. 
                All three performances are highly recommendable. 
              
 
              
George Hurst gets proceedings 
                started with a sprightly rendition of 
                the Imperial March, not quite 
                as pacy as Menuhin's traversal, but 
                with plenty of pluck. The recording 
                of the First Symphony that follows 
                is better still. Although a Boult or 
                Barbirolli approach might be expected 
                from a conductor of Hurst's pedigree 
                and vintage, there is plenty of forward 
                momentum and excitement in his performance 
                at tempi that come close to Elgar's 
                own. There is a fine nobilmente to 
                the opening tune, and triumph in its 
                return amid the fireworks at the symphony's 
                close. The scherzo is sprightly and 
                the adagio flows. It is a straightforward 
                performance, but none the worse for 
                that. If in the final analysis Hurst's 
                is not as distinctive an account and 
                Handley's 
                on Classics for Pleasure, Previn's swaggering 
                recording on Philips or Solti's 
                propulsive reading on Decca – though 
                Hurst comes close to Solti – it is still 
                well worth hearing and an excellent 
                recommendation for new initiates. The 
                BBC Philharmonic is in fine form throughout. 
              
 
              
Sir Edward Downes' 
                recording of the Second Symphony 
                has always been one of my favourites. 
                His pacing is superb, bringing a Barbirolli-like 
                breadth and affection to the first movement 
                and a finale of rare coherence. In fact, 
                Downes is at his most impressive in 
                this final movement, which can so often 
                lose tension and become slack so that 
                by the time you reach the final afterglow 
                you have lost sight of the movement's 
                structure. Not so here. Downes makes 
                each climax count and shapes the opening 
                tune of the finale with a swagger that 
                prepares you for the main theme in all 
                of its rising optimism. If there is 
                a weak spot in this performance, it 
                is that the rondo is a little lightweight, 
                and lacks the punch that a Solti or 
                Handley brings to it. Solti's 
                performance remains the closest to the 
                composer's 
                own in propulsive pace, with Menuhin's 
                not far behind. Handley's 
                account is also superb. However, Downes' 
                recording is just as satisfying in its 
                own way and deserves a place in every 
                Elgarian's collection. The BBC Philharmonic 
                plays just as well for Downes as it 
                did for Hurst a year earlier, though 
                the perspective of the recording is 
                a little distant this time around. 
              
 
              
It is a little odd 
                to include Anthony Payne's elaboration 
                of Elgar's sketches for his Third 
                Symphony as if it was fully one 
                of Elgar's. It has become common to 
                include Mahler's 10th with 
                his complete symphonies, but to do the 
                same here is something altogether different. 
                While Mahler's symphony was all but 
                complete in short score and already 
                partially orchestrated, Elgar's scraps 
                were much less fully developed at the 
                time of his death in 1934. The story 
                of how Payne came to develop Elgar's 
                sketches into a full symphony, drawing 
                on other scraps for the light and balletic 
                scherzo and composing much of the finale 
                and slow movement himself in Elgar's 
                idiom, is now well known. If you don't 
                know it, you can read all about it in 
                Robin Golding's detailed liner-notes. 
                While it is hard to be anything but 
                complimentary about Payne's efforts 
                and the final product stands up well 
                enough as a symphony in its own right, 
                I am not fully convinced that it should 
                be treated as a symphony of Elgar's. 
                Nonetheless, it remains compulsory listening 
                for those who love Elgar's music for 
                those lovely scraps of Elgarian inspiration 
                like the lilting second subject of the 
                first movement, that linger in the memory 
                and could not have been written by anyone 
                else. 
              
 
              
There may be uncertainties 
                about whether the third can really be 
                classed as an Elgar symphony. There 
                are no uncertainties about Paul Daniel's 
                performance with the Bournemouth Symphony 
                Orchestra. They make the best case for 
                the symphony that I have heard, certainly 
                superior to the premiere recording made 
                by Sir Andrew Davis and the BBC Symphony 
                Orchestra. Daniel's feel for Elgarian 
                rubato is natural and unaffected and 
                he inspires the orchestra to great things. 
                The BSO is a plucky band, and when a 
                Berglund, a Rattle (that pioneering 
                Mahler 10!) or, in Elgar, a Silvestri 
                is on the podium, they play for dear 
                life. Their commitment and verve more 
                than compensating for any lack of sumptuousness 
                in the strings. In their hands, the 
                salt spray swing of the first movement 
                comes off very well, and the slow movement 
                has a forward momentum and sense of 
                mystery that is quite winning. Even 
                the finale is impressive, and only the 
                scherzo fails to convince entirely, 
                more a function of the material than 
                of the performance. 
              
 
              
If you want all three 
                of these symphonies – Elgar's two and 
                the one by Payne using Elgar's material 
                – this is probably the easiest and cheapest 
                way to get them in performances that 
                will wear well. Naxos' box is not unchallenged. 
                In Britain it has to contend with Sir 
                Colin Davis' cycle of the three works 
                on the LSO 
                Live label at the same price point 
                (here in Australia, the LSO set costs 
                considerably more than the Naxos box). 
                I have not heard Davis' rendition of 
                the Elgar/Payne third, but I prefer 
                Hurst and Downes over Davis in symphonies 
                1 and 2. While some critics have found 
                Davis' readings revelatory, I find their 
                stop-start nature and Davis' tendency 
                to obsess over details distracting, 
                whereas the Naxos accounts are delightfully 
                free from mannerism and ideal for repeat 
                listening. The Naxos discs also have 
                a more natural soundscape, though as 
                noted above you will need to turn the 
                volume up for the second symphony, and 
                none of them suffer from the distracting 
                vocalising from the podium that mars 
                the Davis accounts. Add in Keith Anderson's 
                helpful liner notes for symphonies 1 
                and 2 and Robin Golding's for number 
                3, and you have an attractive package 
                indeed. 
              
Tim Perry