As 
                  I was driving to school a few weeks ago, for some singular reason 
                  I put Classic FM on the radio and found myself listening to 
                  a piece I did not really recognize. It reminded me a little 
                  of Vivaldi with its insistence on sequences. It had a driving 
                  rhythm but also had a seriousness of purpose especially in its 
                  earnest, fugal counterpoint which seemed to be rather Germanic. 
                  Simon Bates then announced that it was the first movement from 
                  Richter’s 1st Sinfonia; a disc he has “just recently 
                  discovered”. I then realized that I did have some recognition 
                  of this piece because I had already started to listen to the 
                  CD in preparing for this review. 
                
I 
                  was then encouraged to read a quote in the accompanying booklet 
                  notes by Allan Badley. It was from Dr. Charles Burney, the musicologist 
                  (1726-1814) whose entire book I would love to get hold of. This 
                  said that Burney had criticized Richter who “occasionally weakened 
                  his melodic lines by over-use of the sequence” but praised “his 
                  inventive if conservative approach to thematic construction”. 
                  Vivaldi was inordinately fond of sequential repetition and Richter 
                  can be also. You can hear this in the first movement of Sinfonia 
                  III, however these sequences never jar. They are never over-done 
                  and successfully lead the music through its structure.
                
Joseph 
                  Haydn is often called ‘The Father of the Symphony’ as he composed 
                  at least 104 of them by 1800. However, it’s interesting to consider 
                  that when Haydn was just three years old Richter had already 
                  composed at least 64. That is unless I have misunderstood the 
                  numbering which here ranges from 13 to 64. 
                
Richter 
                  writes only for strings. His works date from before the full 
                  advent of the ‘Mannheim School’ under Johann Stamitz 
                  (1771-1757) which took Europe and Mozart and Haydn by 
                  storm a few years later. Richter was not a part of that school 
                  but his music has the passion, drama and drive associated with 
                  Stamitz most of whose symphonies date from c.1750. Richter’s 
                  first movements are clearly in what we now call sonata-form 
                  or, as it was called then, ‘first movement form’. Like Stamitz’s 
                  early symphonies Richter normally has three movements, with 
                  a slow middle one. This may be very short or more likely a still 
                  and thoughtful melody over simple harmonies. Only in the Sinfonia 
                  VI does Richter diverge from that, with an Andante which 
                  is rather too similar in tempo and material to the preceding 
                  Allegro ma non presto. The performers are, I am sure, 
                  only doing what they think Richter intended.
                
Movement 
                  3 is often fast and short. Sinfonia III ends with a very brief 
                  Minuet. Sinfonia VI ends with an even briefer one at 1.44. This 
                  latter work is curious in that it opens, uniquely with a pompous 
                  slow introduction which although separately tracked ends on 
                  the dominant. It must therefore be seen as a lead into the ‘Fuga’ 
                  which follows. The next movement is an Andante which 
                  at almost six minutes seems to outstay its welcome. The finale 
                  is a rather unsuccessful and again very brief Minuet. 
                  This Sinfonia VI is best seen as an experimental divergence 
                  from formal layout. It might be interesting to hear more Richter 
                  in case he experimented further at a later date. 
                
The 
                  Helsinki Baroque Orchestra play on original instruments with 
                  passion and clarity, I love their balanced and warm sound but 
                  a sound which also has a cutting edge. 
                
Aapo 
                  Häkkinen achieves a terrific sense of balance and chooses ideal 
                  tempi with the exception of the first two movements in Sinfonia 
                  VI. He makes a fine difference between the Spiritoso opening 
                  movement of Sinfonia IV and the Presto finale of Sinfonia 
                  V. A harpsichord is used as an almost inaudible continuo. 
                
              
Highlights? 
                Well there are several. The whole of Sinfonia I is gripping and 
                holds ones attention. The same applies to the still slow movement 
                of Sinfonia IV and the memorable melodic invention of the equivalent 
                movement of Sinfonia V. I shouldn’t worry too much; to be honest 
                the whole disc should give much pleasure. I noticed that it’s 
                cheaper than a bottle of fairly average Niersteiner and, ultimately, 
                considerably more fulfilling. Buy it.
                
                Gary 
                Higginson
              
see also Review 
                by Tim Perry