Unfortunately there 
                is no indication on this CD that this is a first volume. 
                Are we to suppose that this is Anthony Wass’s only recital of 
                Elgar’s piano music, or do we expect another CD in the near future?  
                Certainly there are just about enough piano pieces to fill a second 
                volume, even if most of the works would be arrangements or pieces 
                as yet unpublished.  Yet sadly Naxos appear to start off ‘cycles’ 
                of music only to give up part way through – we need only think 
                of the Liszt and Ireland piano music projects. 
              
But let us assume 
                    that this is the first instalment. My first criticism 
                    is that the works are not chronological.  The main competition 
                    is probably Peter Pettinger’s recital on Chandos and the putative 
                    ‘Complete Piano Music of Edward Elgar’ played by David Owen 
                    Norris. Yet this last project has so far only resulted in 
                    the first volume. Pettinger is largely in date order but omits 
                    the piano version of the Enigma Variations. David Owen 
                    Norris includes a few of the unpublished pieces in his recital 
                    and promises every scrap of piano music that fell from the 
                    composer’s pen – a trainspotter’s delight. 
              
Yet Wass’s recital 
                    seems to lack rhyme or reason.  The only substantial piece 
                    is the Enigma Variations – the rest are by and large 
                    attractive but minor salon pieces. I would have expected at 
                    least one other heavyweight such as the Concert Allegro 
                    or the impressionistic In Smyrna.
              
But let’s see 
                    what we do have.  The recital opens with the 1930 revision 
                    of the early Sonatina.  This lovely work was composed 
                    in 1887 for a certain May Grafton who happened to be Elgar’s 
                    niece.  The work is in two movements: an Andantino and an 
                    Allegro. The latter is marked ‘as fast as you can’ which may 
                    have been a tall order for an eight year old girl.  The first 
                    movement was originally an ‘allegretto’ but was revised to 
                    a slightly gentler pace. 
              
Wass continues 
                    with an arrangement of the nostalgic Dream Children. 
                    This is a work that falls into the same category as the Wand 
                    of Youth Suites and Nursery Suite. It is perhaps 
                    epitomised by the inscription on the score, an excerpt from 
                    an essay by Charles Lamb: “We are not of Alice, nor of thee, 
                    nor are we children at all ..... We are nothing; less than 
                    nothing, and dreams. We are only what might have been ...." 
                    Alice was perhaps to be identified in the composer’s mind 
                    with the Windflower – his ‘friend’ and ‘confidante’. Elgar 
                    once told Sir Sidney Colvin: "I am still at heart the 
                    dreamy child who used to be found in the reeds by Severnside, 
                    with a sheet of paper trying to fix the sounds and longing 
                    for something very great."
              
Une Idylle 
                    (1884) was originally composed for violin and piano and was 
                    a part of Elgar’s Op. 4 which also includes a Pastourelle 
                    and a Virelai.  The three pieces were dedicated to 
                    a certain E.E in Inverness and were composed in remembrance 
                    of a holiday romance.  The Idylle is a typical wistful 
                    piece that serves its intention well.
              
Wass then jumps 
                    forward some thirty years to 1913. The attractive Carissima 
                    was originally composed for small orchestra. Apparently the 
                    material was derived from some of Elgar's musical sketchbooks. 
                    Curiously this orchestral miniature was destined to become 
                    the first piece that Sir Edward recorded for HMV. As the programme 
                    notes point out this is a work that has ‘immediate appeal, 
                    in the composer’s unmistakable musical language’.
              
May Song 
                    was another piece originally composed for violin and piano 
                    and is a fine example of the better kind of salon music that 
                    was so prevalent at the turn of the century. The middle ‘trio’ 
                    is absolutely perfect in its balance and sentiment. 
              
Douce Pensée 
                    (Rosemary) is another fine example of the genre and is 
                    subtitled ‘For Remembrance.’ But somehow I think this 
                    epithet may have been for the publisher and his public rather 
                    than representing the composer’s autobiographical thoughts.
              
I must confess 
                    that I just love Echo’s Dance (1917) from The Sanguine 
                    Fan. Once again we have a work that was inspired by Lady 
                    Alice Stuart-Wortley who is better known to Elgarians as ‘Windflower’. 
                    She suggested to the composer that he write a ballet: it was 
                    to be a charity affair raising funds to help with ‘Concerts 
                    at the Front’.  The libretto is basically about Pan and Echo 
                    – playing their duets in a Watteau-inspired landscape. The 
                    title of the ballet derives from a painted fan by a local 
                    artist depicting the two gods. ‘Sanguine’ actually refers 
                    to a red chalk that was the artist’s medium - so is largely 
                    incidental to the plot of the ballet.
              
The last of the 
                    miniatures is the ‘Serenade mauresque’ which the programme 
                    notes suggest seems to drift back and forth between the shores 
                    of Spain and the Malvern Hills.  It is the piece I least enjoyed 
                    yet the ‘English’ bit is quite attractive, the Spanish perhaps 
                    a bit derivative. It was the second of the Three Characteristic 
                    Pieces Op.10. 
              
It is not necessary 
                    to discuss the Enigma Variations in any great detail 
                    as it is possibly one of the best known works by Elgar and 
                    in fact by any British composer. I was not too sure how to 
                    approach this piano ‘reduction’. Was it worth listening to? 
                    Or is it just a kind of study aid?
              
I was surprised 
                    to find out that there are at least two other versions currently 
                    available including Anthony Goldstone [MRCD94001] playing 
                    Elgar’s Broadwood piano and Maria Garzon on ASV [CDDCA1065] 
                    - so that gave me some confidence in the work. I was a bit 
                    concerned about the provenance of this transcription – was 
                    it by Elgar himself or by someone at a later date? A brief 
                    look at Elgar’s ‘Letters to his Publisher’ revealed that the 
                    piano version was presented to Novellos at the same time as 
                    the orchestral score – so it was not an afterthought or a 
                    money-spinner.
              
I was thus able 
                    to sit down and listen to a ‘genuine’ piano work by Sir Edward 
                    and not feel that somehow I was being cheated or short-changed.
              
Let me say straightaway 
                    that I was seriously impressed by the clarity of the work. 
                    The piano version, although obviously simplified, brings out 
                    lines of musical thought, harmonies and nuances that appear 
                    to be lost in the more complex orchestral score. Much as I 
                    love the orchestral version – especially when conducted by 
                    Sir Adrian Boult - I do feel that this piano transcription 
                    deserves a life of its own. 
                  
              
As with all CDs released 
                by Anthony Wass the piano playing is excellent. As noted above, 
                the structure of the Enigma Variations is revealed as I 
                have never heard it before. He does not play the ‘salon’ pieces 
                in a style that is patronising, but reveals the wistfulness and 
                longing that are inherent in their style. 
                
                John France  
                
                
                BUY NOW  
              
AmazonUK 
                ArkivMusik              
              
 
              
For reviews of other Naxos releases of British composers,
                    see the themed
              release page