The volumes of Rossini’s Péchés de Vieillesse contain 
                  an abundance of music rich in verve and wit. Not long ago I 
                  reviewed a volume in the ongoing complete recording by Stefan 
                  Irmer on Dabringhaus und Grimm (MDG 618 1353-2 - see review). 
                  Now here is a volume from another complete recording by Paolo 
                  Giacometti. Having been relatively neglected for many years, 
                  the Péchés are certainly getting plenty of attention 
                  – and very intelligent and skilled attention at that – in our 
                  day. Indeed there is a third series by Marco Sollini on Chandos. 
                                 
                  
I haven’t heard enough of the three series to express a confident 
                  preference for one over the others (if pressed I might, on admittedly 
                  insufficient evidence, plump for Giacometti). Nor am I even 
                  sure that I would want to choose one at the expense of the others 
                  – the existence of all three is too delightful to be any kind 
                  of embarrass de richesses.
                  
              
Giacometti is a fine 
                pianist, thoroughly attuned to the matter and manner of these 
                mischievous, inventive pieces; never solemn but, in their own 
                distinctive idioms, perfectly serious. They are full of a rich 
                humanity, their brilliance tempered by a certain amused world-weariness, 
                by ironic self-deprecation as well as by an eagerness to poke 
                fun at the pomposity of others. 
                This is music both quintessentially Rossinian, redolent of the 
                younger man who had written the operas, and richly allusive in 
                its echoes of other composers, such as Chopin, Schumann, Liszt 
                and Bach - as well as in the presence of what sound uncannily 
                like anticipations of Satie or Poulenc. 
                
                The Prélude Prétentieux is presumably designated “prétentieux” 
                because Rossini is amused – or affects amusement – when he finds 
                himself writing a well-worked out fugue! The Valse Anti-Dansante 
                could certainly be relied upon to confuse most dancers; in the 
                brief, but interesting booklet notes by Giacometti it is aptly 
                described as “a crooked waltz”! The Prélude Semipastorale starts 
                out as pastorally idyllic as one could wish, but this mood is 
                disrupted by a richly virtuosic second section; the Tarantelle 
                pur Sang is certainly full-blooded (and technically demanding), 
                but its fierce momentum is twice entertainingly disrupted by the 
                bells of a church procession. This strategy of breaking the decorum 
                of forms and idioms – disrupting the rhetorical rules and expectations 
                in a fashion primarily humorous but occasionally also disconcerting 
                – is one of the hallmarks of these pieces. I wonder if it isn’t 
                perhaps one of the things Rossini had in mind when he called them 
                péchés (sins)? And they are the sins of old age not just 
                because Rossini was quite old when he wrote them, but because 
                he was too old (and comfortable) to have to worry about sticking 
                to the rules – they are the ‘sins’ against the ‘laws’ of music 
                that he could get away with as an old man.
                
                On this recording Giacometti plays a Pleyel piano of 1858. On 
                some earlier volumes in the series he played an Erard of 1837. 
                The Pleyel suits the music perfectly – it has both intimacy and 
                power and it has been very well recorded by Channel’s engineers. 
                
                
                Whether you come to this because of a love of Rossini’s operas 
                or because of a passion for the piano music of the nineteenth 
                century, you will surely find a great deal to enjoy. There’s writing 
                which is beautiful and lyrical; there’s writing which is funny; 
                there is even some which, miraculously, is both beautiful and 
                funny. 
                
                Glyn Pursglove 
                
              
BUY NOW  
              
AmazonUK 
                  AmazonUS