Though the pianist 
                  and conductor here are new to me the orchestra is not, as of 
                  late the Bambergers are being recorded with increased frequency. 
                  Financially I’m sure it is good news for them, and they might 
                  count themselves lucky given the state of the recording industry. 
                  Artistically too, they’ve been gathering critical laurels from 
                  most quarters for their activities under Jonathan Nott. Their 
                  Mozart piano concerto series seems to have made somewhat less 
                  of a splash.
                The reasons why 
                  are not hard to work out. The interpretation of both works is 
                  considered rather than impetuous, pleasant rather than wholly 
                  engaging. Beerman’s way with the works is plain, unadorned and 
                  down to business. In this he misses much of the inner workings 
                  of the orchestrations, making things less interesting than they 
                  might have been. The booklet note waxes lyrically about his 
                  experience and qualities – a pity that imagination seems to 
                  be short on the list, but this might develop slightly with age. 
                  In my experience though musical imagination is something you 
                  either have or you don’t. However, nothing he does is distasteful, 
                  vulgar or anti-Mozartian, so things might be worse. That goes 
                  for the other chief areas of interest too: orchestra and soloist.
                Kirschnereit has 
                  been doing the rounds of Continental musical centres too. I 
                  would agree with the opinion quoted from Neue Zürcher Zeitung 
                  on his “technical assuredness and transparency” of playing, 
                  but not with that of Süddeutsche Zeitung in calling him a “Mozart 
                  interpreter of the highest rank”. For me in both concertos too 
                  many phrases go for nothing, and whilst the playing has a polish 
                  and evenness appropriate for Mozart, it is hardly more special 
                  than a decent graduate fresh from any self-respecting conservatoire 
                  might produce. He goes through the motions rather than deliver 
                  any special insights, which ultimately makes for an unmemorable 
                  experience – something I never enjoy saying in connection with 
                  Mozart.
                All of this is a 
                  shame, because reading the fairly enthusiastic booklet note 
                  on the works one is fired up for a first rate performance that 
                  delivers everything these do not. It’s averagely recorded to 
                  my ears; the sound being clean and homogenised in a natural 
                  acoustic, yet not particularly distinctive in any way. 
                Then there’s the 
                  competition – any first rate recording and interpretation would 
                  blow this down in a second. Given that more recordings of Mozart 
                  concerti exist than I could wave a baton at, an industry that 
                  once again is celebrating the arrival of the Mozart cash cow 
                  must do better than this. Whereas other companies have back 
                  catalogue riches to exploit, Arte Nova’s no doubt well intentioned 
                  alternative is likely ever to remain a mere also-ran, exemplifying 
                  the more miss than hit results they have often achieved. Nice 
                  try, but no cigar. 
                Evan Dickerson