Franz SCHUBERT (1797-1828) 
 Rondo for piano duet in D, D608 [10:17]
 Sonata in B-flat, D617 (1824) [20:58]
 Fantasie in f minor for piano duet, D940 (1828) [20:02]
 Rondo for piano duet in A, D951 (1828) [12:43]
 Duo in a minor, Allegro ‘Lebensstürme’, D947 (1828) [12:50]
 Duo Pleyel [Richard Egarr, Alexandra Nepomnyashchaya (fortepiano, Pleyel
    1848)]
 Pitch a’=441 Hz.
 rec. Kapel op ‘t Rijsselt, Eefde, The Netherlands, 1–3 February 2019. DDD. 
		Reviewed as lossless (wav) press preview.
 LINN CKD593
    [77:11]
	
	Schubert’s piano duos, especially those from his final years, are among his
    finest works. Here they are presented in company with two earlier pieces
    for the same combination. There’s no lack of recordings at all prices, but
    no two recordings contain exactly the same coupling. In this case, I
    thought it a shame that Linn didn’t run to a second CD and include the
    Grand Duo in C, D812, as Erato did with the recordings by Anne Queffélec
    and Imogen Cooper. The Grand Duo is on such a large scale that it was once
    thought to have been a preliminary sketch for the ‘lost’ Gastein Symphony,
    which is now believed to have been the ‘great’ C major, No.7 or No.9
    depending on which system you follow.
 
    Having said that, I see that Warner replaced that 2-CD set with a single
    Apex release, formerly a budget price CD and now a more expensive download,
    offering D940, D947 and other works (0927498122). The two ex-EMI Gemini
    twofers, from Christoph Eschenbach and Justus Frantz, which together give
    the fullest selection of these duos, are also download only, but still
    priced effectively as a budget twofer, around £11 each in lossless sound. Even
    more complete, Caroline Clemmow and Anthony Goldstone offer almost nine
    hours of Schubert Duos on Divine Art (DDA21701 – CDs around £35, lossless
    download varies from £15.99 to around £67!).
 
    As the blurb for this Linn release aptly states, ‘Schubert’s great F minor
    Fantasie, although justly famous, represents only a small proportion of his
    music for piano four-hands’. There are more than 30 such works, and I do
    hope, therefore, that Linn will give us more from this source.
 
    Queffélec and Cooper (Apex) and Eschenbach and Frantz (Gemini x2) offer the
    music on a modern piano. The Duo Pleyel, appropriately, have recorded it on
    a Pleyel fortepiano of 1848, a little later than the music but closer to
    what Schubert would have heard than any modern instrument. Fortepiano
    haters should read no further, but those with a more open mind are unlikely
    to be put off by what they hear. The top end is a little clattery and the
    bass end a little too prominent at times, but the innocent ear soon
    adjusts.
 
    It’s the three late works that will attract attention to this recording.
    The Duo Pleyel give plenty of room for these works to expand. That’s true
    of the Fantasie, where they take a little longer than Paul Lewis
    and Stephen Osborne (Hyperion CDA67665: Recording of the Month –
    
        review) or Queffélec and Cooper, though there’s never any sense that the
    performance lacks energy as well as imagination. It’s not just the choice
    of instrument which lends itself to the slightly slower timing: Andreas
Staier and Alexander Melnikov, on a Graf fortepiano, take the    Fantasie slightly faster overall (Harmonia Mundi HMM902227 –
    
        review).
 
    Simon Thompson, who reviewed the Harmonia Mundi, is no great fan of the
    fortepiano, an instrument that has won me over in recent years, but his
    chief concern about that recording of the Fantasie is the failure
    to respond to all the very varied aspects of the work. It is, indeed, a
    very varied piece, but the Duo Pleyel do adapt themselves to its varied
    moods – even better than Queffélec and Cooper, hitherto my version of
    choice. I think that even fortepiano haters might find themselves hearing
    through the sound of the instrument into the heart of the music in this
    recording. At times, you feel that the music is stretching the instrument
    to its limits – think of those pianos with broken strings in the
    Beethovenhaus in Bonn – but never quite to destruction.
 
    The Rondo, D951, interjects a note of happier times between the
    two stormy works. Even here, however, there’s none of the cheer of a Mozart
    Rondo and, once again, the performance brings out the varied aspects of the
    music. Here too, as in the Fantasie, the Duo Pleyel give the music a
    little more time to expand than Queffélec and Cooper.
 
    The very title of the Lebensstürme duo (the storms of life) which
    rounds off the recording reminds us that Schubert’s last years were lived
    under the shadow of an illness which he must have been aware was terminal.
    The booklet reminds us of his extraordinary ability to compose one work
    after another, but the notes also refer to the sense of deep sadness and pathos
    in the music, as reflected in the quotation:
    ‘Every night when I go to bed, I hope that I may never wake again, and
    every morning renews my grief.’
 
    Loth as I am to take the historicist attitude to literature and music too
    far, it’s very tempting to read such comments into Schubert’s late works –
    those here, the C major String Quintet, D956, and the posthumous Piano
    Sonata No.21, D960. On the other hand, the Octet, D803, one of Schubert’s
    sunniest works, was also composed at a time of mental and physical pain in
    1824 and many of the letters which he wrote as late as the Spring and
    Summer of his final year, 1828, suggest that he was in high spirits.
 
    Lebensstürme
    may not have been Schubert’s nomenclature, but the work lives up to its
    name from the beginning, and this performance leaves the listener in little
    doubt of that. This time Egarr and Nepomnyashchaya are a little faster in
    this work than most, yet here, as in the Fantasie, they capture
    the different moods which it encompasses, with no sense of hurry in the
    reflective passages. On Hyperion Lewis and Osborne come in
    considerably - almost three minutes - slower, at 15:35, with Evgeny Kissin and James Levine
    (RCA 82876692832) not far behind at 15:16.
 
Timings don’t lie, but the fact is that Egarr and Nepomnyashchaya never 
	seem to hurry the music; Kissin and Levin actually    sound faster for much of their
    journey through this work. Much as I share the general appreciation of the
    RCA recording, not least for its inclusion of the Grand Duo, I
    enjoyed the new Linn equally. Clemmow and Goldstone, on Divine Art, capture the energy of
    the music but rather underplay the reflective elements, while Lewis and
    Osborne, though far from neglecting the energetic passages, bring out the
    reflective elements. In the case of such a multi-faceted personality as
    Schubert, it’s inevitable that recordings will tend to reveal some aspects
    more than others.
 
    The main considerations in choosing a recording of these duos are the
inclusion by Kissin and Levin of the Grand Duo, along with the    Fantasie and Lebensstürme, together with some shorter
pieces, and your attitude to the fortepiano. If you must have the    Grand Duo, the RCA recording is download only, 85 minutes
    originally running to two CDs, at around £11 in lossless sound, but without
    booklet. Some dealers are offering the CDs second-hand. If you have another
    recording of the Grand Duo and are prepared to tolerate the
    fortepiano, there is every reason to choose the Linn recording. For those
who really must have the modern piano, but don’t need the    Grand Duo, Lewis and Osborne provide a very fine alternative. 
 
I
    listened to them via the lossless download, available, with pdf booklet, from
    
        hyperion-records.co.uk
    
    for £8; the CD is available there for the same price, so the choice of
    medium is yours. That recording also comes with a most appropriate cover from a
painting by Caspar David Friedrich and, even more to the point,Lebensstürme is accompanied by very fine accounts of the    Fantasie and Rondo, as per the Linn recording, the
    Variations in A-flat, D813, and two shorter works.
 
    The Linn recording quality is good, as are Richard Egarr’s notes, 
	if slightly short in detail of the individual works and a little too inclined to link Schubert’s
    music and his health, but only a little – if there is one composer where it
    seems almost inevitable to make the connection, it must be Schubert. This is 
	a very
    worthwhile addition to the many fine recordings of this four-handed music.
 
    Brian Wilson