There are a few things 
                that the listener needs to know about 
                this work before listening. 
              
 
              
In the first place, 
                as the composer writes in one of two 
                essays that he has contributed to the 
                booklet, he conceived an ambition to 
                set these poems of Blake a very long 
                time ago, when he was seventeen to be 
                precise. A few parts of the current 
                work were written as long ago as 1956 
                though most of the music was composed 
                in 1973-4 and again between 1979 and 
                1982. These dates are significant for 
                it was only after taking up a teaching 
                post at the University of Michigan in 
                1973 that Bolcom had sufficient time 
                to devote to this composition and bring 
                his long-cherished project to fruition. 
              
 
              
And the University 
                of Michigan connection is the second 
                important fact. A strong impetus behind 
                the way in which the piece evolved was 
                Bolcom’s desire to write a piece that 
                could involve as many members of the 
                University’s music department as possible. 
                That accounts for the huge forces required 
                to perform Songs of Innocence and 
                of Experience (some 450 performers 
                participated in the concert that these 
                CDs commemorate). To some extent this 
                also accounts for the variety of musical 
                styles on show here for Bolcom includes 
                jazz and rock musicians, among others, 
                in his line-up. 
              
 
              
However, the stylistic 
                diversity of the work owes even more 
                to a crucial issue. As Bolcom writes 
                "The Blakean principle of contraries 
                … would also dominate my approach to 
                the work, particularly in matters of 
                style." He goes on to say that 
                research by Blake scholars confirmed 
                his suspicion that "at every point 
                Blake used his whole culture, past and 
                present, highbrow and vernacular, as 
                sources for his many poetic styles." 
                As a consequence, throughout Blake’s 
                collection of poems "exercises 
                in elegant Drydenesque diction are placed 
                cheek by jowl with ballads that could 
                have come from one of the "songsters" 
                of his day." Bolcom has therefore 
                taken it as a stylistic imperative that 
                he should faithfully mirror this approach 
                in setting the poems to music. This 
                last point is fundamental, I think, 
                to an understanding of what William 
                Bolcom is about here. What we have is 
                a highly eclectic composition but there 
                is a purpose to the eclecticism, 
                though I must admit that as a matter 
                of subjective taste I’m not entirely 
                comfortable with some of the results. 
              
 
              
Setting the forty-seven 
                poems that comprise Songs of Innocence 
                and of Experience (which, for ease 
                of reference I’m going to refer to from 
                now on simply as Songs) is, in 
                itself, a huge challenge. The poems 
                are mainly short and in fact there are 
                only two settings in the whole work 
                that last for longer than five minutes. 
                When one adds in a further seven short 
                movements for orchestra alone and one 
                wordless piece for chorus and orchestra 
                we have no less that fifty-five separate 
                short movements. This in itself raises 
                the danger of "bittiness," 
                a danger that’s magnified by Bolcom’s 
                conscious decision to write in a variety 
                of musical styles. I’m afraid that this 
                danger is not overcome: in my view one 
                of the work’s failings is that it is 
                too fragmentary. 
              
 
              
I think perhaps Songs 
                would have been less fragmentary 
                and would have hung together better 
                had Bolcom not written in so many musical 
                styles. There’s much fine and interesting 
                music in Songs. The trouble is 
                that the excellent music sits cheek 
                by jowl with some settings that, quite 
                frankly, strike me as almost banal. 
                Perhaps the most jarring such example 
                comes very early on. The third poem 
                in Songs of Innocence (CD 1, 
                track 3) is ‘The Lamb’ (how nice 
                to hear it in a setting other than the 
                lovely but ubiquitous one by John Tavener!). 
                Bolcom’s version is a setting for solo 
                soprano and orchestra. The compass of 
                the vocal line is extremely wide-ranging 
                and has a Schoenbergian feel to it. 
                Immediately that has finished, however, 
                ‘The Shepherd’ is introduced by a gentle 
                country and western-style fiddle, accompanied 
                by guitar and harmonica. The vocals 
                are provided by Peter "Madcat" 
                Ruth, in what, thankfully, is his only 
                appearance in the piece. I’m sure his 
                off-the-note vocal style is authentic 
                but it’s not for me, I’m afraid, and 
                though I assume that Bolcom is very 
                deliberately employing a naïve 
                style in this number I don’t feel that 
                the setting does justice to Blake’s 
                gentle pastoralism and the stylistic 
                juxtaposition with the preceding setting 
                is too great a jump. 
              
 
              
It seems to me that 
                Songs of Experience Part III 
                (CD 3, tracks 11 to 17) illustrates 
                well both the strengths and the weaknesses 
                of the work and, indeed, of the performance. 
                The first poem, ‘The Clod and the Pebble’ 
                is a short, spiky setting for solo tenor 
                and orchestra. This is stimulating though 
                the tone of the soloist, Thomas Young, 
                is too unvaried and rather uningratiating. 
                This is followed by ‘The Little Vagabond’, 
                in which the soloist is Bolcom’s wife, 
                Joan Morris. The music is in what sounds 
                to me like a cross between country-and-western 
                and cabaret. I’m sorry, but for me this 
                just doesn’t work at all. In fact I 
                feel the music diminishes Blake’s words. 
                But then immediately after that we hear 
                ‘Holy Thursday’. The contrast with the 
                preceding number could not be greater. 
                Indeed, it’s almost painful. This is 
                dignified, eloquent music and it’s movingly 
                sung by soprano soloist, Carmen Pelton. 
                When Bolcom is in this vein he is superb. 
              
 
              
That’s followed by 
                ‘A Poison Tree’, which is recited by 
                Nathan Lee Graham in an affected, overdone 
                style that I find unappealing. Next 
                we hear ‘The Angel’, in which soprano 
                Ilana Davidson is required to sing a 
                demandingly high tessitura. Unfortunately, 
                despite Miss Davidson’s valiant efforts 
                the result sounds a little ugly, due 
                to the lie of the music, and this is 
                a great pity since Blake’s words are 
                anything but ugly. But yet again we 
                have an immediate contrast in the shape 
                of ‘The Sick Rose’. Bolcom gives this 
                a slow, intense treatment. The setting 
                makes its effect through economy of 
                means, both in the solo line (contralto 
                Marietta Simpson) and in the accompaniment. 
                This seems to me to be an extremely 
                successful setting, which is beautifully 
                responsive to the text and, indeed, 
                enhances it. Miss Simpson’s fine singing 
                is a pleasure to hear. The final piece 
                in the sequence is ‘To Tizrah’. This 
                is a most expressive chorus with a powerful 
                orchestral accompaniment. I love the 
                way that after all the power Bolcom 
                closes the setting quietly. However, 
                there’s a surprise at the very end. 
                After the music has finished Nathan 
                Lee Graham speaks the words "It 
                is raised a spirit and body." I’m 
                not sure where these words come from 
                for they appear neither in the text 
                that is printed in the Naxos booklet 
                nor in another edition of the poem that 
                I looked up. I’m sure there’s a valid 
                artistic reason for the inclusion of 
                the words (just as I know there’s a 
                valid artistic reason for everything 
                in Songs) but it’s a puzzling 
                addition and one that fails to quite 
                come off. 
              
 
              
I’ve discussed this 
                section of the work in some detail because 
                it sums up my frustration with Songs. 
                There’s so much in the piece that 
                is good and much else that interests 
                me even if it doesn’t quite appeal. 
                But there are points in the score that 
                jar and unfortunately these occur too 
                often for me to "buy into" 
                the work without reservation. 
              
 
              
What of the performance? 
                Well, there’s a large array of soloists. 
                Most of these are good though I find 
                Thomas Young’s tone rather hard and 
                he seems to sing at only one volume. 
                I can’t believe that Bolcom doesn’t 
                ask his tenor for light and shade since 
                all the other soloists provide it. Nathan 
                Lee Graham is also an acquired taste. 
                I do not care at all for his style of 
                recitation. His singing is variable 
                but at his best, such as the Big Band 
                rock number, ‘London’ (CD 3, track 11), 
                which I think works surprisingly well, 
                he’s very effective. Most of the female 
                soloists do well though, at the risk 
                of seeming ungallant, it seems to me 
                as if the recording has come a little 
                too late in Joan Morris’s career. She 
                sings her husband’s music with genuine 
                feeling but the vocal presence and breath 
                control now seem much diminished. 
              
 
              
There are two absolutely 
                outstanding soloists. Christine Brewer, 
                as you might expect, is magnificent 
                and it does seem a shame that she only 
                has two solos, lasting only some ten 
                minutes in total. The real find of the 
                set, however, is baritone Nmon Ford, 
                a singer who was new to me. His first 
                appearance, in ‘Hear the Voice of the 
                Bard’ (CD 2, track 2), alerts us at 
                once to the presence of a special singer. 
                He has a splendid voice, which he uses 
                to project this fine number magnetically. 
                This is an imposing song, which is enhanced 
                greatly by Ford’s presence and intelligence. 
                Later Miss Brewer and Mr Ford sing ‘A 
                Little Girl Lost’ together (CD 3, track 
                8). Most of the number is sung (very 
                well) by Christine Brewer but the two 
                singers combine to excellent effect 
                for the final stanza, duetting dramatically. 
              
 
              
There’s a considerable 
                amount for the various choirs to do 
                and the performances of all the choral 
                numbers are first class. There’s abundant 
                light and shade in the singing, which 
                is also splendidly disciplined, whether 
                the full choirs are involved or just 
                a smaller group. The choristers can 
                recite as well as sing. The famous ‘The 
                Tyger’ is spoken in unison (and it’s 
                all marvellously together) by the huge 
                choir. The first four verses are thrillingly 
                recited over an accompaniment of powerful 
                drumming before other instruments are 
                added for the last two verses. This 
                is a very original and exciting way 
                to treat the poem. And how daring, too, 
                since the slightest imprecision on the 
                part of the singers would sound even 
                more exposed than if they were singing. 
                Top marks to the choirs for this performance 
                and, indeed, for their singing throughout 
                the work. 
              
 
              
The instrumentalists 
                also do Bolcom’s music proud. I’m sure 
                it helped enormously to have a conductor 
                of Leonard Slatkin’s experience and 
                ability on the podium. There’s just 
                as much polish and commitment in the 
                playing as there is in the choral singing. 
              
 
              
The engineers have 
                done well to capture this vast ensemble 
                in good, realistic sound. The booklet, 
                which is in English only, is very comprehensive 
                and includes the full texts of all the 
                poems. 
              
 
              
I’m truly sorry that 
                I have reservations about this uneven 
                work. It’s an ambitious composition, 
                which contains much that is entertaining 
                and rewarding. In the end, however, 
                I suspect it is just a bit too ambitious 
                and therein lies the trouble. However, 
                mine is very much a subjective response 
                and other listeners may well have a 
                different view, not least about the 
                eclectic nature of the music. And certainly 
                the piece has been well served by the 
                performers by any objective standards. 
                It’s unlikely that it will be recorded 
                again so admirers of William Bolcom 
                should take full advantage of the enterprise 
                that Naxos have shown in making it available 
              
John Quinn  
              
see also review 
                by Rob Barnett 
              
comments received 
              
It is very interesting 
                indeed to read John Quinn's reflections, 
                both informed and honest as they are, 
                on Bolcom's - what? Oratorio? Song cycle? 
                Phantasmagoria? As John points out, 
                some will take opposing views, as Rob 
                Barnett does in his more unqualifiedly 
                positive review. I myself find Joan 
                Morris remarkable in her earthy presentation 
                of the text, even if her singing does 
                not quite conform to bel canto requirements; 
                Nathan Lee Graham's performance of "Poison 
                Tree" in particular strikes me 
                as powerful and not a little scary. 
                I actually appreciated Ilana Davidson's 
                expressionist coloratura more than Christine 
                Brewer's strained high notes in the 
                Bergian "Earth's answer". 
                And so on. If I may explain one point: 
                John says >>After the music 
                has finished Nathan Lee Graham speaks 
                the words "It is raised a spirit 
                and body." I'm not sure where these 
                words come from for they appear neither 
                in the text that is printed in the Naxos 
                booklet nor in another edition of the 
                poem that I looked up.<< The 
                reason for that is probably the same 
                as the reason why authors of the booklet 
                have omitted the words in question: 
                they accompany the image Blake made 
                to accompany the poem (a relatively 
                late addition to *The Songs of Innocence 
                & of Experience*) - thus: "It 
                is Raised/A Spiritual Body" under 
                the picture, which can be seen online 
                by going to the following : http://www.blakearchive.org/cgi-bin/nph-1965/blake/erdman/erd/
                Not all editions of Blake - unfortunately 
                - include the engravings. 
              
Martin Walker