Johannes BRAHMS (1833–1897)
 Concerto for Piano and Orchestra No.1 in d minor Op.15 (1859) [46:58]
 Concerto for Piano and Orchestra No.2 in B-flat, Op.83 (1881) [47:35]
 András Schiff (piano)
 Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment
 rec. December 2019, Abbey Road Studios, London. DDD.
 Reviewed as downloaded from press preview.
 ECM NEW SERIES 4855770
    [46:58 + 47:35]
	
	I am going to be comparatively brief because I wanted to get my
    appreciation of this excellent recording online as soon as possible; at least one of
    my colleagues is also planning to review it. In fact, in a busy schedule, I
    had overlooked it until I was asked to obtain it for review. I’m very
    pleased that my attention was nudged.
 
    It matters not a whit that I find András Schiff’s attitude to
    ‘authenticity’ inconsistent – he has his reasons for preferring Bach on the
    piano and Schubert on the fortepiano – when this recording of the two
    Brahms concertos, on a restored 1859 Blüthner piano, directed from the 
	keyboard and with an established period-instrument orchestra, is so good that I expect
    it to be my reference version in future, even in preference to old
    favourites such as Emil Gilels and Eugen Jochum from 1972 (both concertos,
    DG Originals 4474462). The DG comes effectively as 2 CDs for 1 and throws
    in performances of the Fantasies, Op.116, so it has a clear price advantage
    over the new ECM, which runs to two full-price CDs or downloads and offers
    no fillers.
 
    Hyperion also run to two CDs, with no fillers, for Stephen Hough and Mark
    Wigglesworth with the Mozarteum Orchestra (CDA67961: Recording of the Month
    –
    
        review), but that’s offered as a 2-for-1: £10.50 on CD, £8.99 for 16-bit
    download, or £13.50 for 24-bit download, both with pdf booklet, from
    
        hyperion-records.co.uk.
    From the abundance of recordings, that’s the version I have chosen for
    comparison; although Hough uses a modern piano, his playing is sensitive
    and he never over-powers the small-scale orchestra – again, using modern
    instruments but with a sense of period style dating right back to the time
    when their predecessors accompanied Géza Anda in Mozart. John Quinn noted
    the ‘slightly grainy’ sound of the Mozarteum strings, though not as a
    criticism; in fact, it’s one reason why the Hyperion is the closest that I
    know in style to the new ECM.
 
    In
    
        December 2013
    
    I wrote how impressed I was, especially by Hough’s contribution to that
    recording, blending the romantic and classical aspects of Brahms’
personality. It was by the merest whisker that I chose the Chandos    Hansel and Gretel as my Recording of the Month instead. Listening
    again, it’s Hough’s contribution to the adagio movement of the
    First Concerto, where he and the orchestra are in perfect accord, that I
    still rank his recording so highly. At 13:28, he may seem to be
    over-working the emotion – Schiff is a little faster at 11:57 – but the
    result is wonderful, with just a sliver of extra magic by comparison.
 
    Then I listened to Schiff and the OAE again, and that sliver of difference
    became almost non-existent: there’s perfect accord between soloist and
    orchestra here, too. It probably helps that Schiff is directing – not that
    Gilels and Jochum (who give the movement even more time to expand) and
    Hough and Wigglesworth didn’t also gel very well together. Seen live,
    Schiff always appears in rapt accord with the music, as does Kyng-Wha
    Chung; it’s no coincidence that both of these musicians rank very high on
    my list of favourite performers alongside Janet Baker and Emma Kirkby. (Why
    is it so long since we had a new recording from Ms Chung?)
 
    Schiff’s piano sounds a trifle dry at times, but I think that very few are
    likely to be put off by that; more importantly, as it was made close to the
    time that these concertos were written, and blends with the
    period-instrument orchestra so well, I imagine that Brahms will be pleased
    as he drinks yet another cup of that strong celestial coffee. That doesn’t
    mean that the piano lacks power at the right moment, as on its entry in
    the first movement of the Second Concerto, where power is intermingled with
    sensitivity.
 
    The new recording leaves the listener in no doubt that the mature 
	work is the finer concerto, but I’ve always had a soft spot for its 
	predecessor, dating right back to the LP of Rudolf Serkin, the Cleveland 
	Orchestra and George Szell which I owned and the Clifford Curzon stereo 
	recording, also with Szell, but with the LSO, that I borrowed from the 
	university record library. The Serkin is now an expensive and booklet-less 
	download-only Sony album on G010001039988I or a Presto Special CD, only a 
	little more, with Schumann and Mendelssohn (SBK48166). The Curzon is also download only, but more reasonable priced and with a
    coupling, the Franck Symphonic Variations (Decca E4663762). For all his
    very fine advocacy of No.2, Schiff’s No.1 also leaves me feeling that soft
    spot just as much as those two classic accounts.
 
    In No.2, it’s the andante – più adagio third movement that makes
    or breaks a recording for me. It needs to be intense, but not too intense –
    there are some almost baroque moments – and the interplay between soloist
    and solo cello – Luise Buchberger here – has to be as well judged as that
    between the soloists, and between them and the orchestra in Brahms’ Double Concerto. It is. At
    10:06, compared with Gilels and Jochum at a much slower 14:04, it may seem
    that the new recording rushes this movement, but the reality is quite
    otherwise: all the magic is there. As it is at the intermediate overall
    tempo adopted by Hough and Wigglesworth (11:53).
 
    All in all, this new recording is not likely to thrust Gilels/Jochum and
    Hough/Wigglesworth out of my two top versions of these concertos, but it
    comes very close indeed. The DG recording, excellent in its time, wears its
    years very lightly, and the Hyperion is available both on CD and in hi-res
    sound. I listened to the new ECM in 16-bit (wav) format, but that, too, is
    very good. I also sampled some of the tracks as streamed in 24/96 sound.
    Both Schiff and Hough in the allegro non troppo rondo
    finale of No.1 bring the house down, at almost identical tempi, in either
    format, but both recordings sound just a little fuller in 24-bit.
 
    I held back on Recording of the Month status for the Hyperion, but I can’t
    deny Recommended status to this new Schiff recording. If you think yourself
    likely to be averse to Schiff’s return to the sort of sound that Brahms
    would have heard, you need not be. Try it out first if you can, to reassure
    yourself; the finale of No.2, starting delicately, even tentatively and
    ending confidently, should do the trick. I had to listen to that again
    straight away. If you are still not convinced, or the finances are tight,
    you need not think Hough on Hyperion and Gilels on DG at all second-best,
    but Schiff and the OAE now become my version of choice.  There have 
	been some very fine recordings of Brahms recently: David McDade has been 
	praising the B-Records releases of his chamber music -
	
	review -
	
	review - and four colleagues have sung the praises of Herbert Blomstedt 
	and the Gewandhaus Orchestra in the Second Symphony -
	
	review -
	
	review -
	
	review -
	
	review - but the Schiff concertos are likely to be among my Recordings 
	of the Year.
 
    Brian Wilson