Six to Seven 
          Erwin SCHULHOFF (1894-1942) 
          String Sextet (1924) [22:21] 
          Richard STRAUSS (1864-1949) 
          Metamorphosen (1945) arr. Rudolf Leopold [27:00] 
          Hyperion Ensemble (Annelie Gahl and Gunde Jäch-Micko (violins), 
          Firmian Lermer and Jörg Steinkrauß (violas), Detlef Mielke 
          and Astrid Sulz (cellos), Martin Heinze (double bass on Strauss) 
          rec. St Konrad, Abersee, Austria, 1997 
          PALADINO MUSIC PMR 0010 [49:21] 
        
         The two works on this disc are two composer’s 
          responses to the experience of war, one by Schulhoff who was profoundly 
          affected by his time as a serving soldier during the First World War. 
          He ended up in an Italian POW Camp. His life was cruelly cut short during 
          the Second World War. The other is by Strauss who watched as his beloved 
          country fell into ruins through allied bombardment and with it his world. 
          
            
          Schulhoff’s work sounds very modern for something written almost 
          ninety years ago; the first movement is the most expressionist which 
          makes the second slow movement sound dreamy with an austere beauty that 
          is quite irresistible. The third short movement marked Burlesca. 
          Allegro molto con spirito and based on a Slav folk melody is delicious; 
          a welcome relief from the general bleakness of the work as a whole. 
          The final movement Molto adagio reminds the listener what drove 
          Schulhoff to compose the work. Its suitably dark nature rounds off a 
          powerful musical statement on war. Schulhoff was friends with Janaček 
          and, interestingly, just as Paul Hindemith was the violinist in the 
          first performance abroad of Janaček’s sonata for violin and 
          piano in 1923, he was also a member of the sextet that first performed 
          Schulhoff’s work the following year. I was surprised to learn 
          that the sextet was only published for the first time in 1978 for there 
          is no doubt after hearing it that it is a major contribution to the 
          corpus of 20th century chamber music. Repeated hearings will make it 
          a favourite with any lover of such repertoire. The Hyperion Ensemble 
          which came together precisely to present the two works on this disc 
          for a festival concert in 1996, and has since stayed together, are clearly 
          committed performers of this work and have done Schulhoff good service 
          here. 
            
          Reading something of Richard Strauss reveals him as a pathetic character 
          far from the willing tool of the Nazis as has often been the impression. 
          Rather he was a true believer in the nature of art and the German contribution 
          to its history. Choosing to stay after Hitler took power resulted in 
          difficult choices when trying to steer a path through those turbulent 
          times. His efforts to protect his Jewish daughter-in-law and Jewish 
          grandchildren led to compromises that, perhaps, in other circumstances 
          he would not have made. He was resolute in his determination to continue 
          to perform the music of banned composers such as Mahler and Mendelssohn. 
          In 1933 he wrote in his private notebook “I consider the Streicher-Goebbels 
          Jew-baiting as a disgrace to German honour, as evidence of incompetence 
          - the basest weapon of untalented, lazy mediocrity against a higher 
          intelligence and greater talent”. Strauss had hoped that since 
          Hitler, an ardent lover of Wagner, had admired Strauss’s opera 
          Salome that he would support and champion German culture. Goebbels 
          on the other hand had no time for Strauss’s music and wrote that 
          once “we have our own music ... we shall no further need of this 
          decadent neurotic”. There is plenty more evidence of his hatred 
          for the regime not least the entry in his diary following the end of 
          the war that reads “The most terrible period of human history 
          is at an end, the twelve year reign of bestiality, ignorance and anti-culture 
          under the greatest criminals, during which Germany's 2000 years of cultural 
          evolution met its doom”. 
            
          Strauss’s Metamorphosen was written in 1945 amid the blackest 
          days of the war during which he witnessed the destruction of every major 
          opera house. This music is the starkest representation of the grief 
          he must have felt at what seemed to him to be the destruction of German 
          culture itself. Originally composed as a work for septet it was Paul 
          Sacher that great “artpreneur” who commissioned it to be 
          turned into a work for 23 strings. Here in a version by Rudolf Leopold 
          we can hear it as originally intended. The greatest of Strauss’s 
          gifts is his incredible imagination when it comes to orchestration. 
          His use of strings is almost unparalleled in the music of the twentieth 
          century and this work is proof of that. Gorgeous harmonies abound with 
          sounds that reach upwards toward the heavens all tinged with sad reflections 
          on the folly of Man and its pernicious results. 
            
          Strauss wrote in 1947 that "I may not be a first-rate composer, but 
          I am a first-class second-rate composer." I and millions of others would 
          beg to differ and indeed his reputation as one of the greatest composers 
          of the first half of the 20th century is assured. This work 
          is among those that caused that assessment and deservedly so. The performance 
          here is sumptuous but with Strauss’s uncanny ability to write 
          fabulous melodies that could hardly be otherwise. 
            
          This disc presents two very different reactions to the experience of 
          war, the earlier one more advanced in experimental terms, the later 
          more conventionally “classical” but both equally effective 
          and affecting. 
            
          Steve Arloff