I was telling a friend about the arrival of Ronald Stevenson’s piano 
            music CDs on my doorstep. What surprised him most was that for once 
            in my life I was lost for words.
             
            My usual methodology for a review would be to work through the track-listings 
            in either batting or chronological order, making comments on each. 
            However, this is beyond me in this instance. Firstly, I was overwhelmed 
            by the sheer width and depth of the repertoire. Secondly, every piece 
            is brand new to me: I felt that it would take longer to absorb this 
            music than a decent turn-around time for a review would normally demand. 
            Thirdly, I felt that if I were to comment or analyse each track I 
            would end up writing an essay the size of a large dissertation. This 
            brought me back to point one. I am so reliant on the liner-notes for 
            historical and contextual information that the reader may as well 
            read them as my review.
             
            However, something demands to be said. What I propose to do is to 
            give a thumbnail sketch of the composer and his music (a hopeless 
            task!), briefly consider the ‘genres’ of piano music presented, and 
            finally pick out two or three groups of works that impressed me most 
            on first or second hearing.
             
            Ronald Stevenson is one of the most important living composers. Alas, 
            he is probably best known for having composed what is regarded as 
            ‘the biggest single-movement work in the piano literature’ the Passacaglia 
            on DSCH, which is some 80 minutes long. The Symphonic Nocturne 
            for Piano Alone by Sorabji is actually longer. This is unfair. 
            Stevenson has written a huge range of compositions in virtually every 
            genre with the exception of symphony (excepting the massive Ben 
            Dorain) and opera; there is an early Berceuse Symphonique. 
            There are four impressive concertos – two for piano, one for fiddle 
            and one for cello. Stevenson has contributed handsomely to vocal music 
            with many settings of Scottish and English poets including Hugh MacDiarmid, 
            William Soutar, Robert Louis Stevenson and William Blake. Nor has 
            he ignored poets from other cultures - there are setting of the Japanese 
            poet Basho, the Vietnamese Ho-Chi-Minh and the American Edgar Allan 
            Poe. Other music includes a number of choral settings, an impressive 
            list of choral works and educational music. One of the largest categories 
            in his catalogue is for piano: there are in excess of 500 pieces/works/movements 
            for that instrument.
             
            Ronald Stevenson is also a great pianist. He is in the trajectory 
            of the grand romantic pianists of the past such as Busoni, Leopold 
            Godowsky, Percy Grainger and Paderewski. Later exponents of this style 
            of playing included John Ogdon and Earl Wild. However it is Busoni 
            and Godowsky that I feel reflects much of the music presented in these 
            three CDs.
             
            I do not wish to develop a debate about the differences between transcription, 
            arrangement and paraphrase, however it needs to be understood that 
            these nouns are applicable to the vast majority of pieces in the collection. 
            Three loose definitions may not go amiss. Firstly an arrangement is 
            quite simply an adaptation of a musical work for another instrument 
            or ensemble than it was originally intended. Secondly a transcription, 
            leads on from an arrangement, but usually introduces ‘more or less 
            imaginative changes’ which may or may not be taken as conforming to 
            the composer's own procedure, if he had written for the medium. 
            Finally, a Paraphrase is usually seen as being a solo work of ‘great 
            virtuosity’ in which well known melodies were considerably elaborated. 
            All three practices are presented on this CD. However there can often 
            be a wee bit of blurring around the edges.
             
            A good summary of Stevenson’s place in the musical sphere is given 
            in the liner notes: ‘If we reject, as too superficial, the standard 
            distinctions between transcription and free composition, one comes 
            close to understanding Stevenson’s outstanding corpus of music. Of 
            course, individual pieces vary enormously both in terms of approach 
            and in terms of style. It is as though Stevenson’s music as a whole 
            becomes a kind of meeting place for kindred and diverse spirits.’ 
            For this reason, I believe that it is not possible to describe what 
            Ronald Stevenson’s music ‘sounds like’.
             
            I want to look at two groups of works –the Chopin and the Purcell 
            pieces. However before that I believe that the opening track acts 
            as a kind of ‘prelude’ to the entire CD set. This transcription of 
            Bach’s Komm, süsser Tod (Come sweet death) BWV 478 was made 
            in 1991 on the ‘birthday’ of Busoni. The sleeve-notes suggest that 
            this piece is a ‘modest curtain raiser’ – well it may be comparatively 
            modest in terms of the ‘massiveness’ of Stevenson’s music, however 
            for me this rework of the original is both highly romantic and deeply 
            moving. The sentiment of the original has been retained in its entirety, 
            but re-presented in a musical language alien to, but complementary 
            to, Bach’s intention. It is dedicated to Leopold Stokowski, who gave 
            much encouragement to Stevenson.
             
            A good place to begin a detailed exploration of these CDs would be 
            with the seven ‘Purcell’ numbers. The ‘Little Jazz Variations on Purcell’s 
            ‘New Scotch Tune’’ is a work that has been revised and added to over 
            the years. It is a lovely, moody piece that is more ‘bluesy’ than 
            ‘jazzy’. The preceding Purcell ‘Toccata’ 
            was composed in 1955. In the composer’s opinion it is ‘a very fine 
            transcription which is respectful and newly individual; traditional 
            and exploratory ... musicological ... and inventive – Yes!’ It works 
            well for piano. The ‘Three Grounds (after Purcell)’ date from 1995. 
            Once again these are beautifully contrived pieces that take the original 
            material written for strings and literally recreate them for the piano. 
            These are attractive retrospective tunes that typify Stevenson’s ability 
            to view earlier composers through his own compositional lens. The 
            ‘Hornpipe’ and ‘The Queen’s Dolour (A Farewell)’ are equally effective: 
            however the former seems further from Purcell’s intention with its 
            hard-edged harmonies than the latter, which is heart-achingly lovely.
             
            The first CD contains the ‘complete’ Stevenson/Chopin transcriptions 
            and paraphrases. The liner-notes point out that Leopold Godowsky’s 
            ‘53 Studies Based on Chopin Etudes’ had a huge impact on Stevenson 
            ‘as both a composer and pianist’. The Pénseés sur des Préludes 
            de Chopin are dark and introverted: each number is prefaced by 
            a quotation from the French philosopher Pascal. Stevenson picks and 
            chooses bits and pieces of Chopin’s music and combines and recombines 
            them at will. It is a deep work that seems to transcend the original. 
            I enjoyed, if not quite related to, this adaptation. However, some 
            listeners would rather that Stevenson had not ‘tinkered’ with what 
            most regard as original masterpieces.
             
            The mood is much lighter with the ‘Variations-Study on a Chopin Waltz’. 
            It is a lovely re-working of the original posthumous C sharp minor 
            Waltz making it much more involved and technically complex than the 
            original. The ‘Etudette d'après Korsakov et Chopin’ is fun 
            with allusions to bumble-bees and etudes: complex but thoroughly enjoyable. 
            The Chopin section continues with a Waltz ‘spectacular’ – ‘Three Contrapuntal 
            Studies on Chopin Waltzes’. Chopin on vacation in Vienna would be 
            my take. This definitely reinforces Bruno Walter’s view that Strauss 
            waltzes are ‘Champagne from Heaven’! Finally there is a ‘Fugue on 
            a Fragment of Chopin’ – in this case based on the theme from the F 
            minor ‘Ballade’. To quote the liner-notes, ‘this is given full textbook 
            fugal treatment, complete with Busonian craftsmanship and erudition 
            via eloquent pianistic layouts and exhaustive permutations of double 
            note figurations.’
             
            Other fine works on this CD set include the delicious ‘L’art du chant 
            appliqué au piano – Volume 1 & 2’ which are transcriptions, re-workings, 
            paraphrases, arrangements (call them what you will) of a number of 
            well-kent tunes such as Frank Bridge’s ‘Go not, Happy day’, Ivor Novello’s 
            ‘We’ll gather lilacs’, and Samuel Coleridge-Taylor’s ‘Demande et Réponse’ 
            (from Petite Suite de Concert Op. 7). Other composers represented 
            in these two volumes include Meyerbeer, Maud Valérie White, Sigmund 
            Romberg and Sergei Rachmaninov. They are invariably a joy and a pleasure 
            to listen to. Then there is the massive Le Festin d’Alkan: 
            Concerto for Solo Piano with its three movements: Free Composition, 
            Free Transcription and Free Multiple Variations. 
            So much could be said about this work that, in the composer’s words 
            “encapsulate my idea that composition, transcription and variation 
            are all essentially the same thing”.
             
            I could have majored on the two Ysaÿe Sonata transcriptions, the ‘Norse 
            Elegy’ or the ‘Canonic Caprice on 'The Bat'’. Then there 
            are the Mozart arrangements …
             
            I was extremely impressed by Murray McLachlan’s playing on these three 
            superb discs. This complex, usually technically difficult - if not 
            nearly impossible, at times - music demands a huge technique and considerable 
            confidence to play and interpret successfully. In recent years, I 
            have reviewed McLachlan’s stunning cycle of Erik Chisholm’s piano 
            music, so it came as no surprise that he brought the same commitment, 
            dynamism and sensitivity to the pages of this music. This is a major 
            project representing a cross-section of Ronald Stevenson’s music for 
            piano. Yet it serves as a perfect ‘introduction’. I am not sure whether 
            ‘Divine Art’ mean to issue further releases of the composer’s music, 
            however just glancing at the list of piano music on the Stevenson 
            Society Webpages 
            suggests that there is enormous potential for the future.
             
            The liner-notes by Murray McLachlan are excellent, comprehensive and 
            interesting. They do require to be read before addressing 
            this music. This is not because the works need explanation 
            before enjoyment, but simply to put them into context.
             
            This is an important release. I hope that it will act as a spur to 
            other performers and record companies to examine more of this composer’s 
            scores. However, the present 3-CD set will long remain as a monument 
            to the achievement of Ronald Stevenson.
              
          John France
           
          see also review by Paul 
            Godfrey