This is the first time I’ve ever heard a Lang 
          Lang CD. I must be the last classical music lover on earth to hear Lang 
          Lang play. 
            
          I had two preconceived notions of the performer going into this CD, 
          and both were confirmed: that he is technically flashy, and that he 
          is quite idiosyncratic. The decision to showcase the études op. 
          25 and ‘Minute’ waltz plays to his strength as a high-powered 
          virtuoso, but between those bookends are three nocturnes, a more spacious 
          waltz, and the 
Andante Spianato and Grande Polonaise. Still, 
          it takes only about fifteen seconds of the very first étude to 
          understand that Lang Lang isn’t going to be playing the way anybody 
          else does. 
            
          That can mean good and bad things. That first étude has rubato 
          poured on heavily and frequent dynamic swells and fades, which work 
          mostly, but seem less than totally natural. The ninth, in G flat, is 
          superbly light on its feet. The tenth, in B minor, is a relentless pounding 
          of the keyboard in the A sections, but more nuanced in the central aria. 
          The heroic final étude’s main theme is initially muddied 
          by the clattering activity, but then Lang Lang softens his tone considerably 
          for restatements which are eye-openingly well-voiced. The nocturnes 
          vary from slightly too stiff (C sharp minor, Op. posth.) to an intelligent, 
          vividly phrased delight (F major, Op. 15 No. 1). 
            
          Overall, there is more maturity and emotional investment than I expected 
          from the performer. Lang Lang’s rubato speaks of a serious artistic 
          imagination, and it produces very distinctive playing. For many a listener 
          the effect may wear thin after a few listens, but for others this will 
          be intoxicating. 
            
          To test reactions to this disc, I created a 
blind 
          listening game at the Good Music Guide, inviting readers to sample 
          five full versions of the first étude from Op. 25, the “Aeolian 
          Harp.” They did not know that the five pianists were Kemal Gekic, 
          Maurizio Pollini (DG), Ivan Moravec, 
Garrick 
          Ohlsson, and Lang Lang. After fifteen ballots were cast, the final 
          tally was in that order. For this one étude, Pollini ranked fourth. 
          Lang Lang ranked first. 
            
          Why was Lang Lang ahead of the pack? Although some questioned the performance 
          (“lethargic and exaggerated”, “a bit mannered,” 
          “rubato is maybe a bit too much”), the praise for a unique 
          view outweighed that: “very powerful,” “high on pathos,” 
          “ethereal,” “the only [pianist of the five] who uses 
          dynamics so well,” and in the most direct rebuke to Lang Lang’s 
          critical reputation, “emphasis on long line vs. moment-by-moment 
          thrills.” 
            
          This was before my fifteen voters knew who they were hearing. I then 
          invited them to guess which of the five was Lang Lang; one got it right 
          but another specifically singled out the real clip as the one 
least 
          likely to be the Chinese pianist. His reaction to finding out the truth: 
          “The reason I’m not embarrassed about missing Lang Lang 
          was I haven’t listened to him in a long time….Now I’m 
          ready to compare him to Cortot.” 
            
          That’s an interesting comparison. Cortot, too, was a maverick 
          performer whose playing can be quite unlike anyone else. Cortot, too, 
          generated intense fans and detractors. Cortot, too, wasn’t afraid 
          to throw in an extra bass chord or two here and there (as one of Lang 
          Lang’s blind listeners pointed out, try track 1, 1:34). And I 
          personally haven’t quite sorted out how I feel about either. 
            
          Will Lang Lang’s Chopin retain its lustre? Maybe. One listener 
          in my blind test played through the clips twice and liked “pianist 
          #2” (Lang) considerably less the second time than he had the first. 
          Another wondered if the pianist has been helping himself by avoiding 
          longer, more structurally complex works in which his weaknesses are 
          more apparent. But there are definite signs of maturity into a serious 
          artist who deserves your attention. In the category “Best New 
          Chopin Recital, 2012,” this ranks second only to the stellar 
Yevgeny 
          Sudbin. 
            
          The review copy is a limited deluxe edition. It’s in book form, 
          so you can read two long essays (one on the composer, one on the pianist) 
          and feast your eyes on eight full-color photos of Lang Lang. The one 
          on page 44 is a contender for Unintentionally Humorous Artist Photo 
          of the Year. Plus, there’s a DVD, “My Life with Chopin,” 
          in which Lang Lang explains fairly articulately how his performing style 
          has matured, and how he is more interested in musicianship than mere 
          technical proficiency. There are old videos of his performances from 
          childhood in the 1990s, and a funny moment where the pudgy teenager 
          celebrates a competition victory, while the older pianist looks on and 
          says “I looked like a little bear.” 
            
          
Brian Reinhart