This disc first appeared around a decade ago on Hyperion CDA67216, 
                  and now makes a reappearance on the company’s lower budget Helios 
                  label. The repertoire is Russian, one a canonic trio, the other 
                  a far less well known work which was originally written for 
                  entirely different forces. I suppose the Tchaikovsky A minor 
                  can’t help but dwarf most disc companions – not merely by virtue 
                  of its size but also by the very nature of its emotional depth 
                  and passionate melancholy. It’s perhaps for this reason that 
                  the Glinka was chosen, though it actually serves as a not unattractive 
                  aperitif. But aperitif, I have to say, is what it very much 
                  remains. 
                  
                  It was written in 1832 and is a compact four movement work lasting 
                  here less than a quarter of an hour. It was originally written 
                  for clarinet, bassoon and piano but it has long been better 
                  known in its arrangement for standard piano trio. It cleaves 
                  to an interesting lineage, sounding in places not unlike Beethovenian 
                  models, most expressly in the opening movement. The scherzo 
                  that follows is energetic but light-hearted in style and tone, 
                  though Glinka ensures that there are moments of contrast, which 
                  are genteelly pugnacious. There is warm filigree in the Largo, 
                  but the decorative, indeed almost rococo piano plasticity points 
                  to a none too profound sense of depth. The finale exploits those 
                  almost contradictory elements of the genteel and the stormy 
                  that are embodied in this work. It’s played with circumspect 
                  intelligence by the Moscow Rachmaninov Trio, who are wise to 
                  the work’s more superficial elements. 
                  
                  Concerning the Tchaikovsky Trio I must be rather more circumspect. 
                  This is a perfectly serviceable performance, well laid out and 
                  distributed, with a just balance between the instruments. It 
                  is however something of a partial reading of the score, something 
                  that might come as balm for those who tire of high voltage examinations 
                  of its gruelling rhetoric. Yet few surely would prefer this 
                  rather discreet and tidy performance to that, say, of the Borodin 
                  Trio or the Gilels-Kogan-Rostropovich of hallowed memory, or 
                  indeed the Ashkenazy-Perlman-Harrell. What this performance 
                  lacks is not necessarily molten vibratos and conquistador pianism, 
                  but a cumulative sense of the work’s power. That said, one is 
                  pleased to note that the big cut sometimes taken is declined 
                  by these forces. 
                  
                  Even so, one can hardly recommend a disc for fourteen minutes 
                  of genial Glinka. The burden of the matter is a lightweight 
                  Tchaikovsky Trio, so caveat emptor. 
                    
                  Jonathan Woolf