Comparison recordings: 
                Glenn Gould, organ. (excerpts) [ADD] 
                Sony M2K 42770 
                Paul Jordan, Heiller organ. (Bergel/Jordan 
                completion) Brioso BR 128 
                Helmut Walcha, organ. (Walcha completion) 
                [ADD] DGG Archive 463 712-2 
                Musica Antiqua Köln, chest of viols. 
                DGG Archive 431 704-2 
                Davitt Moroney, harpsichord. (Moroney 
                completion) Harmonia Mundi HMC 901168/70 
                
                Delmé Quartet. (arr Simpson, 
                Tovey completion) Hyperion CDA 67138 
                
                Alexander and Daykin, pianos. Connoisseur 
                Society CD 4203 
              
 
              
At one time rarely 
                heard, this final work of Bach’s is 
                now very frequently recorded and in 
                a variety of editions and instrumentations. 
                It was first performed publicly by full 
                orchestra and has been arranged for 
                string quartet, chamber ensemble and 
                chest of viols. Even the Swingle Singers 
                performed excerpts. Now accepted as 
                a keyboard work upon the research of 
                Tovey and others, there is still a variety 
                of approaches, for that keyboard can 
                be harpsichord, organ or pianoforte. 
                One of the most successful versions 
                is listed above for pianoforte duo. 
              
 
              
There is also controversy 
                regarding the order of the movements, 
                and even the actual movements themselves, 
                some of which, on one basis or other, 
                can be omitted. This recording follows 
                the 1751 published version without deviation. 
              
 
              
The final fugue was 
                left incomplete by Bach; or, more correctly, 
                Bach failed to write down the completion 
                of the final fugue as Bach most surely 
                knew how it would go to the end. He 
                was known for, beginning with a theme 
                or themes, hearing a fugue in his mind 
                in a single glance, a single grasp. 
                Why the family was unable to engrave 
                Bach’s completion of the work forms 
                a puzzle with many possible answers. 
                Most likely Bach’s sketches were simply 
                misplaced inexplicably; such things 
                happen, sometimes most often when people 
                are being extra careful. Another possible 
                answer that I favor is that the family 
                found the sketch and didn’t recognize 
                it because it was so revolutionary they 
                couldn’t see the connection with what 
                was already written, or in a kind of 
                personal shorthand they couldn’t decipher. 
                Completions of the final fugue have 
                been written out and performed by Tovey, 
                Walcha, Moroney, Erich Bergel and several 
                others. There is little doubt in my 
                mind that Glenn Gould intended to write 
                his own completion eventually, but he 
                died before he could get around to it, 
                hence his recording of the work is truncated. 
              
 
              
The final fugue in 
                its broken form is already the longest 
                fugue Bach ever wrote and had he finished 
                it it would be recognized as one of 
                his greatest works, shortlisted by many 
                for the greatest single piece of music 
                ever written. But what would we think 
                of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony if he 
                never finished the last movement? The 
                Brahms Violin Concerto without its last 
                movement? What do we think of the Venus 
                de Milo without its arms, the incomplete 
                Turandot, the incomplete Lulu, 
                the unorchestrated Mahler Tenth Symphony? 
                What we think is that we want them finished 
                because what we have is off-balance 
                and distorted by not being rounded off, 
                like a table with three legs. So why 
                don’t people play this work as Tovey 
                completed it? His solution is extremely 
                musical, if a little anachronistic - 
                the drama and the harmonies waft in 
                the direction of Wagner. Tovey’s completion 
                is probably already in the public domain 
                — I don’t think Tovey ever intended 
                to copyright it — but even in the strictest 
                interpretation of copyright laws, will 
                probably be in the public domain in 
                four years. It has been recorded several 
                times so in any event the required royalty 
                would presumably be minimal. 
              
 
              
Apart from the gigantic 
                final fugue the rest of this work, consisting 
                of a series, over an hour long, of different 
                kinds of fugues on the same theme can 
                to some listeners seem dry and pedantic. 
                The successful performers of the work, 
                including Winge and those listed above, 
                give the work life and variety through 
                their dramatic instinct and their thorough 
                knowledge of their instruments and their 
                virtuoso skill. 
              
 
              
This recording resembles 
                Glenn Gould’s recording in that it is 
                brisk in tempo and light in touch. Winge’s 
                organ has more attractive sound than 
                Gould’s. This recording is complete, 
                but does not attempt a completion of 
                the final fugue which simply stops as 
                the player runs out of notes on the 
                page, the way it is most often performed, 
                leaving the listener in shock. The organ 
                sound is luscious, bright and clear; 
                for such a small instrument, remarkably 
                varied. Some connoisseurs of the instrument 
                will want the recording purely for the 
                sound of the organ itself. I wouldn’t 
                be surprised if some organ enthusiasts 
                buy the recording simply for the photograph 
                of the instrument, for it is amazingly 
                beautiful. 
              
 
              
Unusually this recording 
                is on a single disk, as is the fascinating 
                version for chest of viols by Musica 
                Antiqua Köln, which requires quick 
                tempi and which further requires clear, 
                bright sound. 
              
 
              
Paul Shoemaker