Berio’s Sequenzas were
                    written over a rather long period, actually some thirty-four
                    years - most of his long composing life. So, they give a
                    fair survey of his compositional progress and of his stylistic
                    evolution.
                
                 
                
                
                Sequenza I for solo flute, composed for
                the celebrated flautist and staunch champion of modern music
                Severino Gazzelloni, is fairly traditional
                    in its aims and means, and probably one of Berio’s most classically
                    conceived mature works. In many respects, it belongs to a
                    series of works for monodic instruments, such as flute, viola,
                    viola and cello, in which the composers attempt some sort
                    of polyphony. One thinks of Hindemith’s sonatas for solo
                    viola, Bartók’s masterly Sonata for Solo Violin,
                    Kodaly’s Sonata for Solo Cello or Alwyn’s Divertimento
                    for Solo Flute. The music is awfully demanding, but
                    still dispenses with modern playing techniques, such as multiphonics.
                
                 
                
                In Sequenza II for
                    solo harp (1963), Berio clearly moves some steps further
                    in liberating the instrument of its classical and Impressionistic
                    clichés, and in trying-out some new playing methods, such
                    as knocks on the wood or playing near the keys; but, most
                    significantly, Berio never writes against the nature of the
                    instrument (this is a common characteristic to all the works
                    in the Sequenza series).
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza III for solo female voice (1966) belongs to a number of works from that
                    same period, such as Circles (1960), Epiphanie (1959/61,
                    rev. 1965) and Laborintus II (1965), in which
                    Berio sets various texts in a completely radical way, by
                    splitting words and phrases into some sort of “word constellations” in
                    which the words’ actual meaning is deliberately by-passed. Sequenza
                    III was written for Cathy Berberian (who else?) exploiting
                    her tremendous vocal range and, her sometimes histrionic
                    sound delivery: whispers, shouts, shrieks, plain singing,
                    breathing noises and the like. The piece is an impressive
                    showcase for vocalist, but I for one have never been able
                    to warm to it wholeheartedly. However, I must say that Tony
                    Arnold’s aplomb is simply stunning.
                
                 
                
                In total contrast, Sequenza
                        IV for piano (1966) is a quite accessible piece
                        of music exploring the instrument’s timbres and textures,
                        and constantly opposing (confronting?) chordal and linear
                        versions of the same basic idea. However, one clearly
                        senses that Berio has now moved some way from the fairly
                        traditional sound-world of Sequenza I and
                        is now close to that of, say, Boulez and his contemporaries.
                
                 
                
                        Sequenza V for solo trombone (1965) does not appeal much to me, in much the
                    same way as Sequenza III and for the same reasons
                    (there is too little music in these pieces for my taste).
                    However, I saw a documentary on Berio some time ago, in which
                    he was seen rehearsing the piece with a young trombone player,
                    and explaining that the piece is some sort of gag, incidentally
                    inspired by the once famous clown “Grock”. I must say that
                    this helped me to consider the piece in another perspective,
                    which does not mean that I find it one of the finest of the
                    set.
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza VI for solo viola (1967), written
                    for Serge Collot, is – as far as I
                    am concerned – one of the finest of the whole series. The
                    music is of course devilishly difficult and demanding, but
                    eventually displays a formidable expressive strength, that
                    Berio later developed in Chemins II (viola
                    and ensemble – 1967) and Chemins III (viola
                    and orchestra – 1968). The cellist Rohan de Saram also arranged
                    it for solo cello, but this version has not been included
                    in this set.
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza VII for solo oboe (1969), written for Heinz Holliger, and in many respects
                    quite comparable to its predecessor, also received an expanded
                    reworking (Chemins IV – 1975); as did Sequenza
                    VIII for solo violin (1976), later “recycled” as Corale
                    su Sequenza VIII (violin, 2 horns and strings – 1981).
                    Incidentally, Sequenza VII exists in an alternative
                    version made in 1995, Sequenza VIIb for soprano
                    saxophone included here.
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza IXa for solo clarinet (1980), too, is not unlike its predecessors, although
                    there is less of the nervously repeated notes heard in Sequenza
                    VI or Sequenza VIII, and more emphasis
                    on melodic material constantly modified and metamorphosed
                    throughout the piece. There also exists an alternative version
                    for alto saxophone (IXb) made the following
                    year and included here too.
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza X for trumpet in C and piano
                    resonance (1984) is thus the only work of the series that
                    calls for some “accompaniment”. “The piano
                    keeps its sustaining pedal, with differing notes, depressed
                    throughout the piece, ensuring the stark trumpet tone is ‘cushioned’ by
                    myriad harmonic overtones, so opening-out its expressive
                    range”. Sorry for such a long quote, but Richard Whitehouse’s
                    words aptly sum-up what is on display in this work, although
                    I must admit that I did not really notice these “myriad harmonic
                    overtones”, which did not deter me from enjoying the music.
                
                 
                
                    Sequenza XI for guitar (1987/8), written
                    for Eliot Fisk, is a splendid piece of music in its own right,
                    and one that should feature highly
                    in any guitarist’s repertoire. Flamenco tradition rubs shoulders
                    with the classical tradition in a remarkably inventive way.
                
                 
                
                When I first heard Sequenza
                        XII for bassoon (1995) some time ago during an
                        Ars Musica festival in Brussels, I found that the piece,
                        for all its merits and qualities, was just a bit too
                        long for its own good. The very fine reading heard here
                        does not much to change my first impression, although
                        this is another inventive and fiendishly difficult piece
                        designed to explore and expand the expressive range of
                        the instrument.
                
                 
                
                The subtitle of Sequenza
                        XIII for accordion (“Chanson”) clearly emphasises
                        the predominantly lyrical character of the music. A most
                        welcome novelty indeed.
                
                 
                
                        Sequenza XIV for solo cello (2002)
                        was written for Rohan de Saram. The music is – once
                    again – strongly expressive, although it includes some percussive
                    effects on the body of the instrument inspired, so we are
                    told, by the Kandyan drum from Sri Lanka. It splendidly rounds-off
                    a thirty-four year musical Odyssey that will remain as one
                    of the peaks of 20th century instrumental music.
                
                 
                
                Naxos and all these players
                    are to be wholeheartedly congratulated for this splendid
                    achievement. The only rival (on DG 475 038-2), which I have
                    not heard, is performed by members of Ensemble InterContemporain;
                    but I found these readings carefully prepared, excellently
                    played and well recorded. In fact, Naxos have the field to
                    themselves since the DG set does not include Sequenza
                    XIV (cello) and includes only one alternative version: IXb (alto
                    saxophone). Add the typical Naxos bargain price, and you
                    get the most attractive offer so far. Self-commending and
                    my bargain of the month.
                
                 
                
                    Hubert Culot
                
                 
                
                
                BUY NOW 
              
 AmazonUK   AmazonUS