Other Links
Editorial Board
- 
            Editor - Bill Kenny 
- 
            Deputy Editor - Bob Briggs 
Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
 SEEN AND HEARD  
UK OPERA  REVIEW
 
            
            
            Wagner, Lohengrin: 
            
            Soloists, Chorus and Orchestra of the Royal Opera House, Semyon 
            Bychkov (conductor). Royal Opera House, 
            
            London, 27.4.2009 (MB)
            
            Lohengrin – Johan Botha
            Elsa – Edith Haller
            
            
            Ortrud – Petra Lang
            Telramund – Falk Struckmann
            
            
            King Henry the Fowler – Kwangchul Youn
            Herald – Boaz Daniel
            First Noble – Haoyin Xue
            Second Noble – Ji-Min
            
            
            Park
            Third Noble – Kostas Smoriginas
            Fourth Noble – Vuyani Mlinde
            
            
            Pages – Anne Osborne, Deborah Peake Jones, Amanda Floyd, Kate 
            McCarney
            
            Elijah Moshinsky (director)
            Andrew Sinclair (associate director)
            John Napier (designs)
            William Hobbs (fight director)
            Oliver Fenwick (lighting)
            
            
 
            BARDA.jpg)
            
 
            
 
The good 
news is that, musically, this proved a strong Lohengrin. Semyon Bychkov, who has 
recently recorded the work – a rarity indeed in these straitened times – elicited 
some of the best playing I have heard from the Orchestra of the Royal Opera 
House. Perhaps most remarkable were the sweet-toned strings, their presence 
immediately signalled in a luminescent first-act Prelude; so sweet, indeed, did 
they sound that one could have believed oneself in Vienna. Each section, 
however, provided aural delight, the woodwind delectable and the brass 
warm-toned, never brash. Bychkov’s shaping of the work’s three acts was very 
fine; there was certainly none of the stopping and starting that have so 
disfigured a number of recent Wagner performances at Covent Garden. My only real 
criticism was a very small number of occasions, most notably at the end of the 
first act, when the tone was lightened in conjunction with a greater metrical 
rigidity. Claudio Abbado showed a good number of years ago that one can present 
a somewhat Italianate Lohengrin without cheapening Wagner in a Verdian 
direction. These were minor blemishes, however, to a generally excellent 
account. 
 
Johan Botha as Lohengrin 
Edith Haller displayed considerable virtues – as well as slightly but fatally 
flawed virtue – as Elsa. Her occasional veering towards a slightly more 
Italianate form of expression might conceivably have bothered some but her 
attention to melodic concerns was far from out of place here. Haller has a 
beautiful voice but is clearly also an intelligent singer. Petra Lang proved an 
estimable Ortrud. If she could not banish memories of Waltraud Meier in this 
production six years ago, that would have been to ask the impossible. Lang may 
not quite possess Meier’s extraordinary stage presence but she performed her 
role very well, with commendable attention both to detail and to the longer 
line. If Ortrud did not make as strong an impression as she might have done 
until later on, that was largely a matter of being hamstrung by so inert a 
production. Gerd Grochowski was due to assume the role of Telramund later on in 
the run but Falk Struckmann’s tracheitis ensured an earlier Royal Opera debut 
for Grochowski. It was a pity not to be able to hear Struckmann who, time and 
again, has shown himself to be a fine Wagnerian (although only once at Covent 
Garden,
as Amfortas). Grochowski confirmed the impression I had in the Berlin 
performance previously mentioned: he sings musically but can sometimes be a 
little overpowered by the orchestra. A certain degree of weakness might be 
considered in character but Friedrich needs at some level also to be a credible 
alternative leader. Kwangchul Youn had also appeared in Berlin, as King Henry. 
His performance here was more mixed; indeed, his surprising insecurity in the 
later stages of the first act made me wonder whether he was ill, although no 
announcement was made. Choral singing was of a predictably high standard, if 
without quite the edge of Eberhard Friedrich’s State Opera Chorus for the Unter 
den Linden house. 
 
So, mostly good news concerning the musical performance. There remains to be 
considered, I am afraid, Elijah Moshinsky’s production. It is not only in the 
light of
Stefan Herheim’s magnificent achievement in Berlin that Moshinsky’s effort 
pales; I had sought in vain to discern any dramatic insight when the production 
was last mounted in 2003. ‘Traditionalists’ might, I suppose, like this lifeless 
pageant, in which absurd Christian and pagan totems are wheeled on and off, a 
risible combat scene makes one wonder about  – but finally decide against – 
comedy having being intended, and the direction of the chorus is more or less 
limited to walking on and off and having each member cross himself. (With 
respect to the chorus, Herheim’s virtuosity had been almost incredible.) 
However, even the notoriously unadventurous 
Johan Botha was a successful Lohengrin, at least in vocal terms. Apart from a 
few instances when he seemed to be tiring, during the second act, his tone was 
well projected and his line well moulded. It is only really by comparison with
Klaus Florian Vogt’s truly stellar performance 
in Berlin earlier this month that one might register any vocal disappointment. 
The other reservation one might entertain is his stage presence. Far be it from 
me to suggest that one should prefer singers on accounts of their looks, or even 
their figure, but in physical stature, Botha is something of a throwback – and a 
half? – to an earlier age, with acting skills to match. A charismatic hero he is 
not.
BARDA.jpg)
BARDA.jpg)
Edith Haller (Elsa) left and Petra Lang as Ortrud
The ‘idea’ 
is clear enough, that of a clash between paganism and Christianity. This is 
undeniably present in the text but in itself does not get anywhere near to the 
heart of Wagner’s dramatic concerns. It is rather as if someone were to claim 
that Tosca is ‘about’ the French Revolutionary Wars. One might, of course, make 
something rather interesting out of a clash of belief systems, especially given 
the undeniably nationalistic aspects of Lohengrin – more prominent than in any 
other of Wagner’s dramas – but there does not seem to have been made even the 
slightest attempt to address any issues with contemporary resonance, or indeed 
to explore any issues at all. I do not mean to imply that the work must be 
updated, or even pulled unduly in our direction; however, remnants of paganism 
in tenth-century Germany are not in and of themselves, I suspect, of particular 
interest to many audiences today. Nor were they to Wagner.
Lohengrin is not an 
historical drama; it is a myth with aspects of historical drama attached, 
somewhat uncomfortably so. This Lohengrin, by contrast, appeared almost as if it 
were a parody of Meyerbeer. If only it had been, it might just have been a 
little more interesting. Let us hope that, the next time Wagner’s Romantic opera 
returns to the Royal Opera House, it is in a new production. The wildest 
excesses of Regietheater, even
Calixto Bieito at his most puerile, would be preferable to this. A somewhat 
odd hint of the latter – not really, I know – came at the end with the return of 
Gottfried and a prolonged, distinctly sexual embrace between him and Elsa. I 
really did not know what to make of that at all, despite the references in the 
programme to Freud and taboo; it seemed to come from nowhere, whereas one could 
have predicted it only too readily with Bieito and his ilk. The totems must 
also, I assume, have pointed to Freudian influence, but I did not feel this 
reflected or explored in the action; again, I can only wish that I had.
One final 
matter: many of the programme essays were of a very high standard. John 
Deathridge and James Treadwell are always very much worth reading on Wagner. 
Likewise Patrick Carnegy on production history, although I thought him perhaps a 
little too diplomatic in his reference to Moshinsky. But if Wagner himself is to 
be given space – and it seems to me an excellent idea that this should be so – 
can it please be in a new translation? To present him even in an adaptation from 
William Ashton Ellis will make the composer, especially to those less versed in 
his prose works, seem like a raving lunatic. Ellis is often surprisingly 
accurate but his style is so bizarre that it is best restricted to those who 
know the German already.
Mark Berry
            Pictures © Clive Barda
            
	
	
            
              
              Back 
              to Top                                                 
                
              Cumulative Index Page 
                           
                                                                                                    
                                    
                          
