Other Links
Editorial Board
- Editor - Bill Kenny
- London Editor-Melanie Eskenazi
- Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
SEEN
AND HEARD INTERNATIONAL REVIEW ARTICLE
Handel,
Messiah:
Glenese
Blake (sop), Carmel Carroll (contr), Kenneth Cornish (ten), Edward
Scorgie (bass), Victor Baughen (cornet), Betty Stewart (organ),
Whangarei Choral Society, Virginia Hill (conductor), St. Francis
Xavier Church, Whangarei, New Zealand 25.11. 2007.
Above the
altar is the high point of the ceiling, surmounted by a glazed
turret. From there the ceiling slopes downwards, terminating at
normal room height behind the semicircular, sectored seating.
Surfaces are smooth and white, setting off the polished wood of
the sea of seating and the simple but strikingly handsome organ
facade. With carpet fitted throughout, it looks splendid;
wonderfully light and airy, and is – obviously – designed
specifically for acoustical clarity during services.
Somehow,
this performance of Messiah seemed much shorter – or less
long – than usual. You couldn’t blame speed or wholesale
abridgement, because the performance lasted over two hours and
omitted only the chorus Let Us Break Their Bonds Asunder.
Nor could I accuse my utterly unfamiliar circumstances, because
these usually have precisely the opposite effect on subjective
time, don’t they?
A 'Messiah' from New Zealand:
Emigré Seen and Heard reviewer Paul Serotsky reports his first
concert after moving South (PSe)
The last time I attended a performance of Handel’s Messiah,
which was a fair few years ago, I battled through dreary, dark,
damp streets, with all my hatches battened down against the
all-but-freezing, windy weather. My destination was not a comfy
seat in the stalls, but a cramped broadcasting studio from where I
heard, through headphones, the mighty Huddersfield Choral Society
accompanied by a substantial orchestra. This occasion could not
have offered a greater contrast.
Having been resident in New Zealand for a nadge under three
months, I was literally tingling with anticipation at this, my
very first opportunity to witness some proper “upside-down” music
making. I was in such a state that the idea of doing a review
never even entered my head until afterwards. Hence: no notebook,
and an account that is more a recollection of my experience than a
review as such.
I sallied forth on a pleasantly warm, sunny, early summer’s
afternoon, needing but a few minutes’ leisurely drive down Kamo
Road to arrive at St. Francis Xavier Church – where a gentleman in
an orange “day-glo” jacket directed me into a convenient parking
space. That’s one luxury that Huddersfield never afforded me!
Lugging my cardigan – just in case the seats were hard – I made my
way in and weighed up the “auditorium”. As you’d expect, the focal
point is the altar table, set on a stepped dais that, backed by a
tall wall, extends across the full width of the room. In the
right-hand corner stands a substantial organ. During the
performance, “resting” soloists took refuge behind the table,
whilst the choir was arrayed, off-centre, between there and the
organ.
Now, what this utterly self-centred music-lover wants from a venue
is a balance between clarity and ambience, plus a respectable
reverberation to fill the cracks with memories of the music’s
passing – in other words, what I’d found when recording in
centuries-old churches built from slabs of rough-hewn Yorkshire
stone. What I was looking at – and hearing in the hum of
conversation – was the same acoustic intention found in any number
of latter-day conference halls, all of which, musically speaking,
sound as dry as dust, with reverberation times measured in
microseconds. I felt a tremor of trepidation: about thirty years
ago I had heard Messiaen’s Turangalila-Symphonie strangled
at birth by the auditorium of the then-new Harrogate Conference
Centre – was this going to be the same? Perish the thought.
When the music began, my anxiety – or, rather, over-anxiety –
evaporated rapidly. Alright, so reverberation was not on the menu,
but I was agreeably amazed to find that the expected clarity, far
from being desiccated, was complemented by a warm bloom. My mind
rubbed its metaphorical hands together – when all’s said and done,
two out of three is not bad – and I gladly turned my attention to
the music and its makers.
The true reason was the performance itself. When a work is so
often performed by all and sundry, creeping competitiveness is
inevitable. Folk indulge in ever-fancier footwork, trying to find
“something new” to make their efforts stand out. In my experience,
Handel’s meditation does not take kindly to such treatment. As if
to prove my point, here it was played with a dead straight bat
and, through the simple expedient of not trying to stand out, to
my ears it did just that.
Whether by design or happy accident, the soloists were party to
the plot. Shunning unseemly exaggeration, they played their parts
with all due dignity. As a former pupil of Whangarei Girls’ High
School, Glenese Blake is what we might call a “local heroine”. In
quiet passages, her voice could charm the birds out of the trees,
and she kept a gratifying grip on her upper register when
ascending to climaxes – even when, at the words “risen from the
dead”, she was assailed by the sound of the local rescue
helicopter, “risen from its launch-pad”.
As well as concert singing, Carmel Carroll’s background includes a
lot of opera. Carmel left the operatic technique safely tucked
away, but brought her operatic experience to bear, as in her
stately singing of He Was Despised, which was a model of
simplicity, and all the more moving for it.
Kenneth Cornish has one of those lovely “open-necked” voices that
remain pure and strain-free all the way up. This vocal quality is
mildly redolent of the castrato voice (no, I’m not implying
anything!), so it fits Handel like a glove does a hand, a
coincidence of which Kenneth took full advantage.
Throughout Messiah, I can feel that customary broad
correspondence between the text’s mood and the “height” of the
voice, with the bass, as ever, getting the lion’s share of the
“doom and gloom”. It follows that Handel pulled a really neat
trick in giving The Trumpet Shall Sound to the bass.
Although Edward Scorgie, far too fresh of face for a gloomy old
bass, didn’t look the part, he certainly sounded it, singing with
exemplary gravity.
“If you can’t get an orchestra, get an organ” would seem to me to
be pretty sound advice – organs generally beat pianos hands-down
when it comes to timbral range and sustained tone. So it was here,
where the organ so often subtly amplified the harmonic space
around the choir. Of course, to get it right requires careful
judgement from both organist and conductor. Between them, Betty
Stewart and Virginia Hill judged it to a “T”; I lost count of how
often my mind went “Ahh!” Coming - courtesy of Whangarei
Brass - Victor Baughen’s soprano cornet provided the one essential
that the organ couldn’t – the “trumpet” that must sound in
The Trumpet Shall Sound and, for good measure, also cast
its brazen glow over three of the choruses.
Speaking of choruses, I should mention the choir! It’s often
commented that the preponderance of juicy choruses – sometimes two
or three on the trot – is what endears Messiah to choral
societies. Less often, it’s hinted that the same applies to
audiences. I will freely admit that, much as I enjoy solo singing,
it’s always the choir that really titillates my hackles. There
are, of course, certain riders – like, “As long as the singing
doesn’t make me wince.” But - why is it that the applause for a
performance of Messiah largely goes to the soloists and
conductor, whilst the choir – the real star of the show –
is left standing modestly in the background? It just doesn’t seem
fair.
I was mightily impressed by Whangarei’s crew of modest souls. With
a somewhat lop-sided complement of 19 sopranos, 14 altos, 7 tenors
and 12 basses, balance and blend must have been problematic. The
sopranos could so easily have dominated whilst the tenors
struggled. Instead, the sopranos traded volume for purity and
evenness of tone, whilst the tenors traded the other way. Also,
rarely have I heard altos “cut through” so clearly, almost if not
quite equal to the sopranos (the basses, as I well know, can take
care of themselves).
Inevitably this adversely affected the blend, although that was
minimised by the astutely-judged organ accompaniment. It is, in
any case, of little consequence, because in polyphonic music the
linear balance matters much more. Clearly, this could not be
accidental, but had to be the result of careful thought, sound
judgment and hard work, and for those we must thank the conductor.
What a joy it was to be able to hear every single strand in
Handel’s antiphonal ball-game, with phrases bouncing happily off
one another exactly as their maker intended.
It all sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? Well, of course, it
wasn’t. There was plenty I could quibble over, like a lack of any
really quiet singing, or a rather too “one size fits all” approach
to tempi. However, I won’t. Why? Well, certainly not
because afterwards I learned that the WCS is an “open” choir. I’ve
always believed that if you’ve the brass neck to perform before a
paying public, you’ve earned the right to be critically assessed
the same as the best of them.
In fact, the reason lies not with them, but with me. Along with my
notebook, I’d left my more pernickety critical faculties at home.
I’d not come as a critic, but as one looking for an afternoon to
remember, and, by golly, that’s exactly what I got. Something
special can happen when ordinary folk, performing before their
peers, strain against the limits of their capabilities. A
“communal” music is made, transcending technique and hence
confounding conventional criticism. So, as it turned out, the
notebook would have been redundant anyway.
Paul
Serotsky
Back
to Top
Cumulative Index Page
