A change from the original plan, 
          here, hence the three pianists playing works for piano duet and two 
          pianos. The line-up was originally scheduled for just Osborne and Lewis, 
          but because of illness Paul Lewis was unable to prepare the entire programme, 
          and so Martin Roscoe stepped in for Messiaen’s almighty (if you’ll pardon 
          the pun) Visions de l’Amen. From adversity comes triumph, and 
          so it was here, but there was the first half to negotiate before that.
        
        Debussy’s Six épigraphes 
          antiques of 1913, arranged from the composer’s stage music for Chansons 
          de Bilitis of 1900, are true masterpieces. Each one of the six movements 
          has its own character. The first movement, ‘Pour invoquer Pan’, in general 
          boded well with its rich yet well-defined sonorities, except for Lewis’ 
          tendency to be sloppy with chording. Again, in the second movement, 
          ‘Pour un tombeau sans nom’ it was Osborne who was the subtler of the 
          two artists (and on occasion it really did seem as if this was two separate 
          characters who happened to be sitting next to each other at a keyboard). 
          Debussy is a fiendishly difficult composer to present well, and it was 
          difficult to escape the impression that this was a warm-up. Indeed, 
          while the two dances (for a girl with crotales and an Egyptian girl) 
          moved closer to a Debussian ideal, it was only in the concluding ‘Pour 
          remercier la pluie au matin’ that the two players were able to relax 
          more and (in Lewis’ case) show more character. Here all was delight.
        
        Paul Lewis has made his name in 
          Schubert, and accordingly he took the primo part for Schubert’s 
          lovely F minor Fantasy, D940 (1828). His credentials implied this was 
          a wise move, and so it was to be; he was much more sensitive to the 
          music’s ebb and flow than in the Debussy. Unfortunately, a rather brisk 
          view of the first section (marked ‘Allegro molto moderato’; here we 
          got just the ‘Allegro’ bit) meant that the special qualities of the 
          key of F minor were glossed over. Rather than enter into Schubert’s 
          interior world, we sat at its edge. Similarly, the Largo sagged. But 
          the greatest caveat to this account was the playing down of the significance 
          of the harmonic arrivals at major-key areas. Here there was no gentle 
          bending of the basic pulse, rather a steamrollering through in the hope 
          that merely the mere depression the keys would usher in some Schubertian 
          sunshine. The best part of the performance was the F sharp minor Allegro 
          vivace, which emerged as playful, but it seemed perhaps a little out 
          of place, sounding as if perhaps the players had at last found a plateau 
          where they felt comfortable.
        
        The staggeringly underrated, ultra-musical 
          pianist Martin Roscoe joined Steven Osborne for a momentous performance 
          of Messiaen’s Visions de l’Amen (1943) after the interval. Osborne, 
          of course, is no stranger to this composer (he has made an excellent 
          recording of the Vingt régards on Hyperion CDA67351/2). 
          Both pianists, indeed, exuded an aura of confidence.
        
        Messiaen’s seven ‘Amens’ are a 
          tour de force of two-piano sonority and compositional virtuosity. 
          They represent a spiritual journey from the ‘Amen de la Création’ 
          to the final ‘Amen de la Consommation’ (complete with ffff climax). 
          At the very beginning, Messiaen sets up a vast acoustic space between 
          the second piano (Roscoe) with its deep, earnest low chords and Osborne’s 
          decorations. As the dynamic increased, so did the tone; time began to 
          slow as the composer’s meditations set in. The third Amen, ‘Amen de 
          l’agonie de Jésus’, was particularly interesting in that the 
          scrunchy harmonies, close to ecstasy, reminded us how closely related 
          agony and ecstasy can be. The aching, sweetly-scented harmonies of the 
          ‘Amen du Désir’ were truly sensual. Bird-song makes an early 
          appearance in Messiaen’s oeuvre in the fifth Amen, ‘Amen des Anges, 
          des Saints, du chant des oiseaux’ (also in this movement, Roscoe provided 
          us with a lovingly presented variant of the creation theme). 
        
        Not all is sweetness and light 
          in this particular universe, however, and the ‘Amen du Jugement ‘revealed 
          just how brutal Roscoe can be (not a description usually applied to 
          his playing), while the second Amen (‘Amen des étoiles, de la 
          planète à l’anneau’ was fully rhythmically alive. The 
          final ‘Amen de la Consommation’ was appropriately and satisfyingly climactic, 
          exuding ecstasy (Osborne’s carillon was particularly effective). There 
          were very few caveats to this account: perhaps the fifth movement could 
          have been even more ‘joyeux,’ but there was no doubting the conviction 
          of the two protagonists.
        
        The Messiaen, indeed, acted as 
          the first half’s redeemer, providing not only a visceral experience 
          but also plenty of food for the spirit.
        
        Colin Clarke