The composers Julian Anderson, 
          Mozart and Prokofiev in this concert were less contrasting elements, 
          more juxtaposed ones. It was a curious mix of a programme that kind 
          of worked, although this was possibly because Prokofiev’s Alexander 
          Nevsky can have the effect of blanking out whatever precedes it.
        
        It was good to hear Julian Anderson 
          introducing Khorovod in a pre-concert talk that also included 
          a sweet performance of Scherzo with trains by members of the 
          clarinet section of the LPYO. Anderson is an eloquent speaker who exudes 
          a certain down-to-earth element about his personality (I like his description 
          of the final section of Khorovod as ‘chill-out’ music). 
        
        Khorovod enjoyed a long 
          gestation (1989-94). Scored for fifteen players, it is, by Anderson’s 
          own admission, a piece wherein he defines himself as a composer. Certainly 
          there is almost a surfeit of imaginative goings-on. Anderson’s use of 
          a note as an ‘axis’ around which the music can rotate is pleasingly 
          aurally obvious. Stravinskian influences are rife (of course, the very 
          title refers to the ‘Round Dance’ in Firebird): the ghost of 
          Soldier’s Tale is there; the well-defined rhythms surely emanate 
          from this source; even the final gesture with its chime refers clearly 
          to Les noces. But it is all of a piece, and all of Anderson’s, 
          one of his most impressive statements and one which emerged fully formed 
          and convincing in the young conductor Vladimir Jurowski’s hands.
        
        The sculpted, highly personal 
          musicianship of Maria Pires in Mozart’s Piano Concerto No. 20 formed 
          an excellent contrast. In its inherent seriousness of intent, the D 
          minor concerto possibly made a happier partner to the Anderson than 
          Beethoven’s Second Concerto, the originally programmed choice, would 
          have. Pires possesses a touch which can be light as a feather (and yet 
          simultaneously project to every corner of the RFH) and plays with almost 
          unparalleled poetry (only Uchida’s Schubert really comes close). She 
          truly shone in the first movement cadenza. In fact, it was the first 
          movement that impressed most: the Romanze was on the brisk side, while 
          the finale was slightly under-voltage. 
        
        Prokofiev’s mighty cantata, Alexander 
          Nevsky, was given an impressive reading. The high-point came with 
          Marianna Tarasova’s dignified account of Field of the Dead, her 
          creamy mezzo evoking all the moving desolation the music requires. Jurowski 
          was alive to the gestural nature of Prokofiev’s writing (the Battle 
          on the Ice showed this aspect of the performance at its best). The 
          major problem came with the London Philharmonic Choir. This was a case 
          of English politeness ruling over Russian red-bloodedness (when they 
          sang, ‘We scythed down the Swedish invaders like grass on parched soil’ 
          you would never believe that was what the words meant).
        
        A concert with impressive moments, 
          but one which left the present writer with a slightly uncomfortable, 
          unfulfilled sensation.
        
        Colin Clarke