The programme for the 2003 Cheltenham 
          Music Festival has exceeded even the high expectations of those who 
          are lucky enough to be familiar with this combination of the perfect 
          venue and the most pleasing programming: astonishingly for a festival 
          lasting a mere seventeen days, there are no fewer than nineteen World 
          Premieres, and beyond that the composers featured this year are Handel, 
          Debussy and Lennox Berkeley (in celebration of the centenary of his 
          birth) with concerts ranging from the ‘something for everyone’ category 
          as exemplified by an evening of ‘arias and songs from the musicals’ 
          performed at the Racecourse by Jose Carreras and Bryn Terfel , to this 
          rather more rarefied recital in the intimate splendour of the Pittville 
          Pump Room.
        
        This was a beautifully planned 
          morning, offering that ideal combination of some of the most familiar 
          songs in the repertoire with some which are only rarely heard, performed 
          by a tenor who is now at the peak of his considerable powers, partnered 
          with elegance by one of our leading accompanists. I would probably line 
          up to hear Mendelssohn’s settings of Heine if they were given by yet 
          another bleater incapable of counting three in a bar, but Ainsley’s 
          performance was perfection: just as Mendelssohn catches that bittersweet 
          and sometimes rather sinister atmosphere which defines these poems, 
          the singing here eschewed any kind of over-sentimental generality and 
          gave the songs as they should be given, with the same kind of loving 
          attention to detail and commitment to the poetry as is usually reserved 
          for, say, Schubert. ‘Auf Flügeln des Gesänges’ is of course 
          the ideal opening to a recital, with its invitation to the pleasures 
          of a world of sensuousness, and it gave ample opportunity for Ainsley 
          to display his lovely, mellifluous tone and remarkable breath control, 
          and for Vignoles to show exactly what it is that makes a great accompanist: 
          so easy to stroll languidly through this music, rippling away under 
          the singer’s lines, but here the accompaniment supported the singer 
          without undue reticence, and the piano provided the partner rather than 
          the mere echo to such phrases as ‘Die Veilchen kichern und kosen’ . 
          
        
        ‘Gruss’ is one of those deceptive 
          little songs: on the page, it looks so simple, with its gently rocking 
          melody and lyrical sweetness, but like so much of Mendelssohn it’s not 
          quite so easy as it looks. Over a delicately hesitant piano, the singer 
          opens his heart, full of love – the words are redolent of innocence 
          but the music throbs with passion, and the challenges here are the temptation 
          towards the arch at the ending ‘Sag, ich lass sie grüssen’ and 
          the lure of making a big bow-wow at that crescendo at ‘Weite’ – traps 
          into which singers have fallen many times in my hearing, but not this 
          one. Ainsley’s beautifully coloured, open tone at that crucial word, 
          and his affectionate but not cloying rendition of the final line were 
          both fine beyond praise. It helps tremendously, of course, that his 
          German, like his Italian, is flawless – his French hasn’t been, of late, 
          but that’s something else. The tempestuous ‘Reiselied’ brought this 
          group to a rousing conclusion, both singer and pianist relishing the 
          sardonic ‘in your dreams’ ending.’ 
        
        Alan Ridout wrote his Georg-Lieder 
          cycle for John Mark Ainsley in 1985, and it’s such a pity that the composer 
          died before these beautiful songs were given their first public performances. 
          It’s easy to hear why Ridout was inspired to dedicate this cycle to 
          this singer, since these heartfelt love songs need exactly the kind 
          of open, direct yet sensitive interpretation which is Ainsley’s hallmark, 
          and although they are a product of the last 20 years they are so graceful 
          that they could not fail to move even those for whom melody died with 
          Mahler. There is a lot of Schumann in the quality of the word setting, 
          especially in the rapt devotion of the first and last songs, yet they 
          possess a lyrical identity that is absolutely their own. Critics lost 
          for superlatives often say of a singer that he ‘sang the songs as though 
          they’d been written for him’ and of course these actually were: Ainsley 
          sang them with perfect grace, and Vignoles gave him eloquent support. 
          This song cycle needs recording, preferably alongside ‘Dichterliebe’ 
          – can the market stand another version of the latter? Of course it can, 
          if it is performed by these musicians.
        
        The second half of the recital 
          was devoted to French music, or at least music with a French connection. 
          Poulenc’s Four Chansons found Ainsley and Vignoles in slightly less 
          ideal form than the Ridout and Mendelssohn: these anxious, rather angular 
          settings of poems by Aragon, Apollinaire and Charles d’Orleans are difficult 
          to bring off successfully, and I felt that Vignoles was not his usual 
          confident self during them, whilst Ainsley, although he characterized 
          the curious ‘Fêtes Galantes’ with plenty of the required swagger, 
          was slightly hampered by a tendency to rush up to the notes and by what 
          seems to have become somewhat approximate French intonation. This is 
          a pity, since his French used to be near-perfect: he’s deeply immersed 
          in two huge operatic projects at present – Munich Festival’s ‘Saul’ 
          and the Salzburg premiere of Henze’s new work ‘L’upupa,’ so perhaps 
          Chanson is rather on the back burner. My eleven year old son, attending 
          his first full recital (as opposed to rehearsals etc) was of the opinion 
          that ‘It’s not his French, that music’s just not any good.’ Out of the 
          mouths… perhaps. Lennox Berkeley’s ‘Tombeaux’ could be said to be cut 
          from the same cloth as the Poulenc, but here Ainsley was able to give 
          more bite to the language and a sharper focus to the phrasing, especially 
          in the short but complex sketches of ‘D’un Fleuve’ and ‘De Narcisse.’
        
        It was a different story with 
          the final part of the recital, a group of Reynaldo Hahn which found 
          the singer in perfect form: I have regarded Hahn as a neglected genius 
          since I was about 15, and it’s wonderful to hear someone like Ainsley 
          singing this beautiful but somehow unfashionable music. ‘A Chloris’ 
          is one of the gems of the repertoire, the Bach-like accompaniment played 
          here with great delicacy, and the words sung with this tenor’s habitual 
          unforced candour. This is something else which Ainsley and Vignoles 
          ought to be recording, although for now those who want to hear this 
          delectable song on disc should be more than happy with Susan Graham’s 
          version.
        
        Hahn once said that he loved Taste, 
          and hated Exaggeration – but the adorable ‘Venezia’ is probably just 
          on the verge of the wrong side of what many people would regard as tasteful 
          – never mind, it’s a delightful piece, first performed on a gondola, 
          complete with piano and assorted acquaintances, all, the composer informs 
          us, ‘well lit.’ These ‘Chansons en dialect Venetien’ are about seduction, 
          youthful enjoyment and the passing of time, and they are not for every 
          singer: the Venetian dialect (not, as the programme informs us, translated 
          by the composer) is a challenge in itself, but it is one which my friend 
          from Padua tells me Ainsley met superbly (‘Only one littal mistek, but 
          hey! who mind?) – quite apart from the tricky temptations into camp 
          which such works present, temptations which of course both Vignoles 
          and Ainsley neatly avoided. I’ve heard Ainsley sing these songs a few 
          times now, and each time he does them differently – it would be so easy 
          to settle into a comfortable sameness with this music, which lies so 
          gratefully for his voice and with which he is clearly in such sympathy, 
          but that’s obviously not for him. I detected a little strain at the 
          top last time in ‘La Barcheta’ but here it was sung with perfect ease, 
          as was the gently erotic ‘La Biondina in gondoleta’ – I think I’ve said 
          before that Ainsley is just about the last person you could imagine 
          propelling (?) a gondola, but he certainly knows how to seduce with 
          his voice, and those gently nudging lines ‘Perchè, o Dio, che 
          bele cosse / Che g’ho ditto, e che g’ho fato!’ (Oh God, what lovely 
          things I said, and did!) were as unforcedly emphatic as they could possibly 
          be. The lightly sardonic ‘Che pecà!’ was sung with the semblance 
          of careless ease, and the final ‘La primavera’ with its ecstatic evocation 
          of springtime was sung and played with such fervour that you could almost 
          smell those roses and lilies – Ainsley just couldn’t resist a touch 
          of ‘I’m an Italian tenor’ at that lusty final line, but if you’ve got 
          the notes – and he certainly has – then why not flaunt ‘em? 
        
        The single encore was Quilter’s 
          magical setting of Edmund Waller’s ‘Goe, Lovely Rose’ and it was as 
          perfect an envoi as could be imagined, sung with tenderness and played 
          with elegance: ‘How small a part of time they share / That are so wondrous, 
          sweete and faire’. I’d think twice before describing either man as ‘sweete 
          and faire,’ but wondrous this recital certainly was. 
         
        Melanie Eskenazi