This disc proves to be something of a mixed bag. In its
favour is the magnificent instrument that is the 'Father' Willis
organ in Salisbury Cathedral. This has been caught in all its considerable
glory by the Regent technical team. The performer, John Challenger, knows
the organ and the cathedral well; he has been the Assistant Director of Music
there since 2012. Challenger also contributes the liner in which he makes
some very valid points. Elgar had a particular empathy for the organ and indeed
organists. Ivor Atkins at Worcester, G.R. Sinclair (immortalised in the Enigma
Variations) at Hereford and Herbert Brewer at Gloucester were close friends.
Through the institution of the Three Choirs Festival they provided a regular
platform on which Elgar's works could receive high quality performances.
Challenger's other point is regarding the 'authenticity'
of the Salisbury organ sound. Although it has been subject to restoration
and maintenance over the years the essential sound of the instrument is much
the same as it would have been when it was built in 1877. So in much the same
way that it seems right and proper for Vierne and Widor to be heard on one
of the great Cavaillé-Coll instruments so hearing Elgar - albeit in arrangement
- on an authentic British organ is a rewarding experience.
Challenger further shows his commitment to this cause by furnishing two of
the arrangements - all the others are by contemporaries of Elgar. They both
sound wholly in accord with the older arrangements. So why the 'mixed-bag'
comment. I have often said that for me the function of an arrangement is to
throw new light on familiar things - not better or worse ... simply different.
Also, I feel it is necessary for the performer to be an impressive interpreter
of the chosen composer's works regardless of the instrument on which
they are performed. This was true of recent discs I reviewed of
Wagner
on piano and
Rachmaninov
on organ. Unfortunately, I do not get much if any sense of Challenger
being wholly in tune with the full range of Elgarian expression. The music
as presented here broadly falls into two types; the meditative and the grandly
rhetorical. Framing the programme are the Preludes to
The Kingdom
and
The Dream of Gerontius - both of which contain elements of both
styles. Overall, the more bombastic the work the better it comes off. So the
three large-scale orchestral marches have a direct simplicity and power that
works to the music's benefit. Certainly Challenger has all the requisite
technical tools at his disposal too.
Yet it is precisely when the music is relatively 'simple' that
the interpretations are least successful. The little
Une Idylle Op.4
is one of the less well-known Elgar miniatures but one that displays his genius
for simple lyrical melody expressed with great skill. It does need the tempo
to ebb and flow - the elusive Elgarian rubato - and Challenger is disappointingly
'straight'. Likewise the jewel-like
Larghetto from
the
String Serenade - which is played with near complete po-faced
solemnity. This approach might well be apt as an interlude in a church service
but fatally undermines the passion so close to the surface of the notes. Another
limitation struck me listening to this too - aside from registration to allow
musical lines to lead independent lives, an organist cannot give inner parts
different dynamic levels. Too often here the entire musical texture is subsumed
into a single dynamic - the inner moving viola lines in the
Larghetto
for example go for nothing. Lastly, and most distractingly the swell box of
the Salisbury organ seems to be a rather unsubtle control. Whether or not
Challenger is over-managing the dynamics I am not sure but rather than having
a linear sense of growth and decay the dynamics jump up or down. There is
a distinct feel of the dynamics being applied from the outside in - loud here/soft
there - rather than being a direct development from and consequence of the
music itself. Two prime examples are the very beginning of the
Imperial
March and the "Jesu pray for me" section of the
Gerontius
Prelude. The great emotional surges in the orchestral texture of the latter
here just become lumpy.
Where there is a cumulative and gradual build in the texture and weight of
organ sonority - such as the transcription of
For the Fallen the
Salisbury organ shows off the power and beauty of its sound and Challenger's
pacing of the music is good. Even here an organ simply cannot recreate those
tenuto 'leans' onto a note that are such a part of
Elgar's string writing. Neither can an organ respond quickly enough
for the febrile accents which characterise much of Elgar's music. Too
often throughout this disc I have the sense of the emotionalism so central
to Elgar being rather smoothed away and made decorous.
The value of this disc is that it focuses on arrangements and as such forms
a unique collection. Especially since these arrangements - with the exclusion
of Challenger and Tom Winpenny - date from Elgar's lifetime so there
is a sense that these are very much authentically 'of the time'.
Unfortunately, Challenger's liner makes no reference to the arrangements
or arrangers - some more context would have been interesting. Most Elgar organ
recitals include the original works; the Organ Sonata and Vesper Voluntaries
fleshed out with arrangements including Ivor Atkins' nominal Second
Organ Sonata which is a transcription of
The Severn Suite. Indeed
Regent have just such a disc in their catalogue performed on this same organ
by
Thomas
Trotter which I have not heard.
Apart from Challenger's liner, the booklet contains a brief history
of the Salisbury organ together with its full specification and the usual
performer biography. All in all, brief but adequate. Interesting repertoire
on a generously filled disc, recorded in fine sound but rather literally performed.
Nick Barnard