Loosely speaking Quincy 
                Porter may be counted as of the same 
                school as Roussel. Indeed Porter studied 
                with Roussel within two years of end 
                of his three year stay in Paris. There 
                is no jazziness in this music nor is 
                it neo-classical, nor central European, 
                nor does it display overt Americana. 
              
 
              
These are the only 
                two Porter symphonies. This is to be 
                compared with his ten string quartet 
                running 1923-1965. 
              
 
              
The First Symphony 
                was premiered by the New York Phil 
                in 1938. It launches with thunderous 
                and energetic exuberance recalling Roussel 
                and Markevitch. There is a baritonal 
                chestiness to the tone of the strings. 
                The storm relents with an emotion-drained 
                cool part Bridge and part Vaughan Williams 
                but without RVW's sense of the numinous. 
                There is some convincing punchy work 
                for the French horns at 1.38 in the 
                finale. There it resembles Randall Thompson's 
                writing in the Second Symphony but without 
                his mastery of emotional yield and eloquence. 
              
 
              
The Second Symphony 
                was commissioned by the Louisville 
                Orchestra and conducted by Robert Whitney 
                in Kentucky on 14 January 1964. It starts 
                with a longish lento - maybe 
                a degree cooler than the andante 
                of the 1934 First Symphony. There is 
                a sly scherzando with a smirk 
                and a wink recalling Weill in his Second 
                Symphony. The adagio is cut from 
                the same cool cloth as the lento. 
                It must be said that every time the 
                horns have centre-stage they shine … 
                and joyously. This they do in the allegro 
                which is Copland-bright. Works in parallel 
                style are the Moeran Sinfonietta, 
                Copland's El Salon Mexico and 
                William Mathias's irresistibly Latino 
                Dance Overture although Porter 
                was not the master orchestrator that 
                Mathias was. 
              
 
              
In the Poem and 
                Dance Porter is more like Roussel 
                again. The work was a commission of 
                the Cleveland Orchestra. The music is 
                oddly jerky in the Poem and contrary 
                to model jazzy in the Dance. The high 
                coursing trumpet and the horn section 
                takes the part of action while Ravelian 
                slips and slides portray the reflective. 
                The title format is pure Creston but 
                the sound is closer to Roussel. 
              
 
              
This disc fills a valuable 
                purpose and closes up another gap in 
                the catalogue. Adherents of the music 
                of Roussel, Hindemith and Markevitch 
                should seek this one out urgently. Stylishly 
                done and recorded with resounding impact 
                and transparency. 
              
Rob Barnett