I’ve already reviewed 
                volumes 3 
                and 4 
                in this series and I have to stress 
                again, for readers who love Sibelius’s 
                orchestral works and hope to find more 
                of the same here, how extraordinary 
                it is that a composer whose orchestral 
                music is instantly recognizable and 
                generally instantly memorable as well, 
                simply becomes another person when he 
                writes for the piano. It is not that 
                the writing is as unpianistic as it 
                is sometimes said to be – or at least, 
                in Gimse’s hands it sounds mostly well-written 
                and resourceful – and I suppose we have 
                to hand it to Sibelius for recognizing 
                that his orchestral style would not 
                transfer to the keyboard and for not 
                trying to make it do so. No, the puzzling 
                thing is that here is (apparently) music 
                by a minor late-romantic with a deft 
                turn of phrase, a droll sense of humour 
                and some gift for atmosphere, but also 
                with a tendency to lapse into sentimentality 
                and stock effects. If Sibelius had written 
                nothing else we might still remember 
                his name, but not as that of a great 
                composer. The music has a voice of its 
                own, but that voice is not Sibelius’s. 
              
 
              
Still, if you like 
                listening to fluent and agreeable romantic 
                piano music, in Håvard Gimse you 
                will find an interpreter who sometimes 
                makes free with the music but who brings 
                it all vividly to life. His vitality 
                in the attractive Kleiner Walzer (op.97/3), 
                his passionate sweep in the Romance 
                (op.101/1; not the fairly well-known 
                Romance in D flat and perhaps the better 
                for it) and his realisation of the gentle 
                melancholy of several of the op.114 
                pieces (the nearest any of this music 
                comes to actually sounding a little 
                like Sibelius) suggest a real love of 
                his task and not just stern duty. In 
                short, if you want this music I can’t 
                imagine it better done – and the few 
                alternatives around don’t come at the 
                Naxos price anyway. But if you want 
                Sibelius, go to the symphonies, the 
                other orchestral pieces, and also to 
                the songs. You won’t find him here. 
              
 
              
Christopher Howell