Schubert sonatas

Newest Releases

Piano solo and duet
  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS

AntonŪn DVOŘŃK (1841-1904)
Piano Quintet in A major Op. 5 (1872 rev. 1887)
Piano Quintet in A major Op. 81 (1887)
Ivan Klánský (piano)
Vlach Quartet Prague
Recorded Martínek Studios, Prague, November 1999 and June 2000
NAXOS 8.555377 [61.42]


This judicious coupling of the Quintets can be recommended as elegant examples of the Vlach Quartetís playing, joined as they are by one of the Czech landsí most able pianists Ė and one who has shown his ensemble credentials repeatedly as a member of the esteemed Guarneri Trio, Prague. Itís the later work that will demand most investigation and here they can be contrasted with a recent Arco Diva recording of it made by the Wihan Quartet, which Iíve also reviewed. The Vlach, the older quartet, take a more measured, rather more Brahmsian view of Op. 81 and in this respect, certainly in terms of tensile drive and quicksilver emotive states, the Vlach follow more in the musical footsteps of the august Smetana Quartet than do the Wihan. The Wihanís impetuous drive reminds one much more (at least in the demanding opening movement and the Dumka second) of the pride of Brno, the JanŠček Quartet.

Itís also noticeable that the transitional passages are more peaceable in the Vlach and Klánskýís hands Ė particularly in the first two movements. Though they adhere to a Smetana Quartet tempo the rhythms are pointed sharply enough and the musical argument is kept moving forward enough for it not to seem at all slow Ė though they are in fact a good minute and a half slower than the Wihan in this movement alone. The individual voices are always of interest in a Czech quartet Ė whose standards of quartet playing have been deservedly renowned since before even the days of the Bohemian Quartet. Michael Ericsson has a rather nasal cello tone but Petr Vernaís viola blends well with him and their solos are engaging. The Dumka certainly isnít as youthful or invigorating as the Wihan and Kasík; instead the older group finds a less frenetic easefulness that is part of their own view of the work. Their finale is fractionally more relaxed in intensity once more than the Wihan though their tempo is actually slightly faster. This also tells one about their rhythmic control and accenting which is full of chiming piano (excellent Klánský) and rustic pizzicati.

The much earlier work, revised and dusted down in the same year as Op. 81, has more solid virtues as a creation. Itís in only three movements and adheres to the portentous Ėlyrical school of central European composition. But the Vlach-Klánský team keep rhythms tight and generate good natural momentum. The highlight of their performance is the Andante sostenuto which emerges as an unsettled, constantly mobile movement Ė attractively but not over-indulgently expressive. The occasionally somewhat prolix finale goes well though even these fine musicians canít quite convince one as to its thematic distinction.

One or two bumpy edits, especially in Op. 81, might disturb those listening closely but others will admire the confident control of the Vlach and their probing musicianship which enshrines as authentic a view of the work as the more mercurial and driving Wihan/Kasík pairing.

Jonathan Woolf


Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on

Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical


Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Cameo Classics
Prima voce
Red Priest
Toccata Classics

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
Classical Editor
Rob Barnett
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
Editor in Chief
   Stan Metzger
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger

Return to Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.