Aureole etc.

Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line

Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

Some items
to consider

new MWI
Current reviews

old MWI
pre-2023 reviews

paid for

Acte Prealable Polish recordings

Forgotten Recordings
Forgotten Recordings
All Forgotten Records Reviews

Troubadisc Weinberg- TROCD01450

All Troubadisc reviews

FOGHORN Classics

Brahms String Quartets

All Foghorn Reviews

All HDTT reviews

Songs to Harp from
the Old and New World

all Nimbus reviews

all tudor reviews

Follow us on Twitter

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor
Rob Barnett
Editor in Chief
John Quinn
Contributing Editor
Ralph Moore
   David Barker
Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger



Karel Ančerl Edition Vol. 1
Joseph HAYDN (1732-1809): Symphony No 93 in D major (1791) [21’05"]**
Franz SCHUBERT (1797-1828): Symphony No 9 in C major, D944 (1825) [47’10"]***
Antonin DVOŘÁK (1841-1904): Slavonic Dances, Op. 46 (1878) and Op. 72 (1886) [69’43"]****
Nicolai RIMSKY-KORSAKOV (1844-1908): Sheherazade (1888) [41’46"]*
Sergei PROKOFIEV (1891-1953): Romeo and Juliet Suites 1 and 2, Op. 64 a and b (excerpts) [26’35"]*****
Montagues and Capulets (2nd Suite, No 1)
Scene (1st Suite, No. 2)
Madrigal (1st Suite, No. 3)
Minuet (1st Suite, No. 4)
Masques (1st Suite, No. 5)
Romeo and Juliet (1st Suite, No. 6)
The Death of Tybalt (1st Suite, No 7)
Recorded: *23 and 25 January 1957; **24 April 1957;***16 and 17 December 1957;****18, 20 and 21 June 1960; *****29 November 1961
Berlin Radio Symphony Orchestra
*****Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra
Conducted by Karel Ančerl

TAHRA TAH 117-119 [206’19"]

Experience Classicsonline

This instalment of Tahra’s celebration of Karel Ančerl concentrates on work he did as a guest with two Eastern European orchestras. All are studio recordings. Apart from the intrinsic interest of the music itself and of the performances the set is valuable because, once again, it supplements the conductor’s commercial discography. As far as I am aware Ančerl did not otherwise record either of the symphonies included here nor did he record the Slavonic Danses in their entirety.

The earliest of the recordings is that of Scheherazade. Generally this is a well thought out reading. The important solo violin part is well taken by the unnamed leader. His playing is good but I have to say that I thought he did not characterise his role to quite the same extent as do either his peer on Fritz Reiner’s February 1960 version with the Chicago Symphony (RCA) or Steven Staryk on Beecham’s March 1957 account with the RPO (EMI). To my ears both these rivals bring even more fantasy and better suggest a beguiling young woman. The Berlin orchestra plays with commitment for Ančerl (though the flipside of this is that the brass do tend to be a bit too enthusiastic and overblow when called upon to play loudly). However, it has to be said that on points of detail they do yield to more prestigious ensembles - sample the ‘placing’ and weighting of the final chords at the end of the first movement (CD 3, track 1, 9’08") which are satisfactory but which both Beecham’s and Reiner’s players manage better.

The beginning of the second movement, ‘The Tale of Prince Kalandar’ is instructive, I think. At the very start both Reiner and Beecham encourage their violinists to be even more languorous and seductive than the Berlin player achieves for Ančerl. The bassoon and oboe solos, which follow immediately, are decently played by the Berlin musicians. However, turn to either of the rivals I’ve mentioned and you’ll hear so much more. Both Reiner and Beecham bring out countless subtle nuances and inflections in just a few bars. Suffice to say that this whole passage takes 1’49” under Ančerl but 2’00” under Reiner and 2’03” with Beecham. As they say, the devil’s in the detail! Of course, it must be acknowledged straight away that both Beecham and Reiner were working with virtuoso bands and, perhaps more relevantly, with players whom they knew very well. Nonetheless, these contrasts do matter, I think.

Once the main allegro of this second movement is launched Ančerl’s reading has drive and is played with commitment. The next movement, ‘The Young Prince and the Young Princess’ is affectionately and tenderly played. There’s some good work from both the strings (who phrase warmly) and from the winds. The finale’s ‘Festival at Baghdad’ is suitably exciting. It’s played with verve and dash, even if the performance does lack the last degree of swagger and panache (cf Beecham here in particular). When the music which depicts the sea is reprised (track 4, 7’39") the brass do get a little carried away and the familiar, vibrato-laden East European brass tone is very evident (I know some collectors have an aversion to this feature while others, myself included, are more tolerant provided the vibrato is not excessive). However, if anyone feels that the brass make heavy weather (sorry!) of the climax, they will surely be soothed by the Conclusion (track 4, 9’00" onwards) which is most atmospherically done.

If I seem to have been a bit harsh in comparing this performance with others I would say in my defence that I’ve paid Ančerl the compliment of getting down from the shelf only the two versions which, in my opinion, are among the very finest ever committed to disc (and which, coincidentally, happen to be roughly contemporaneous with this present performance). In isolation, and in the context of this retrospective set, the performance is enjoyable and has much to commend it. Certainly, it is admirably free from gratuitous histrionics, as one would expect from this conductor.

The next two performances in chronological order both occupy the first CD in the set. I recently reviewed Ančerl’s performance of Haydn’s Symphony No 92 with the Concertgebouw. This present set includes the very next symphony in Haydn’s canon. As might be expected from such a consistent conductor, the performance shares many of the characteristics of his Amsterdam performance. It is neat, alert and incisive. Interestingly, I felt that in this Berlin performance the Minuet tripped along a little more lightly than was the case in the ‘live’ reading of No. 92, and that’s all to the good, I think. It’s followed by a finale which is full of boisterous gaiety. I enjoyed my previous encounter with Ančerl’s Haydn and I welcomed this opportunity to repeat the experience.

The performance of the Schubert perplexed me somewhat. The introduction to the first movement, though strongly projected, struck me as being rather forbidding. The main allegro I found robust and forthright. Doubts began to surface during the slow movement. To my ears the basic tempo seemed too abrupt and martial and the music lacked grace. As the movement unfolded it all seemed too unrelieved and there was certainly insufficient dynamic contrast (this may have been partially the fault of the rather blatant recorded sound). I never seemed to hear a true piano, still less a pianissimo and, indeed, this proved to be characteristic of the performance as a whole.

Similarly, the scherzo seemed reluctant to smile. The playing was efficient but didn’t get my toes tapping. The trio did swing quite nicely but even here the playing was rather too emphatic for my taste. The finale was strong and positive, but really rather too much so. The brass sounded too hefty, even aggressive in tuttis and by the end my ears were weary. The performance of this movement and, indeed, that of the whole symphony never really relaxed.

All in all this performance was a disappointment. I wonder if Ančerl would have lightened up more with his Czech Philharmonic players? Partly I think the somewhat aggressive recording is to blame but I’m afraid that isn’t the whole story. This was really a reading short on charm and humour, rather dour, in fact. One has only to turn to Böhm, Boult or Wand to hear what is really possible in this symphony.

Less than three years later Ančerl was back in Berlin to play Dvořák. Compared with the Schubert we could be listening to a different conductor and orchestra. Here all is light and shade and buoyant joie de vivre. Arguably, these dances are light music but like Brahms’s Hungarian Dances they are light music of the most superior kind. Here Ančerl treats us to a complete performance of the eight dances of each set. It is instructive to see how well he has imparted to his players the sense of rubato so necessary in this music. The characteristic Czech rhythms and cross rhythms are very well done. The Berlin orchestra rewards their Czech guest with lively, often ebullient playing but there is a great deal of sensitive shading also. Where in the Schubert they often seemed incapable of playing below mezzo forte here there is plenty of dynamic contrast. Perhaps the key to it is that it sounds as if everyone is enjoying themselves.

A few examples of the good things on offer will have to suffice. The first dance of the Op. 46 set (CD 2, track 1) gets things off to an exuberant start. By contrast the fourth dance of this set (track 4) is much gentler and receives a charming performance. The following dance (track 5) is a quicksilver piece, which features scampering string and scurrying winds, and I also enjoyed the perky winds at the start of the seventh dance (track 7). The set concludes with an exhilarating furiant (track 8) but there are several contrasting moments of delicacy in this dance and Ančerl ensures his players do full justice to the delicate passages without ever losing momentum.

The Op. 72 set is not as extrovert in character and there is more of a mood of nostalgia. Ančerl is perhaps even more impressive in these dances. The wistfulness of the second dance, for example, seems to me to be caught to perfection (track 10). This was one place where the Berlin strings sounded a bit under pressure in alt but their playing is still perfectly acceptable even if lacking in the last degree of sheen. In this dance I relished the burbling wind accompaniment (track 10, 2’06" to 2’ 34"). All concerned convey very successfully the moments of introspection, such as in the fourth dance in this set (track 12).

This CD is a delight from start to finish. The music is consistently engaging and it is performed beautifully. If for no other reason the set would be worth acquiring for these magical performances. The sound offers a significant improvement on the 1957 Schubert. It is well balanced and faithful.

To complete the set we have what is believed to be Ančerl’s only extant recording with the illustrious Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra. These extracts from Prokofiev’s Romeo and Juliet suites were recorded in Berlin during an afternoon immediately before they were performed in concert. Tahra say the recording includes three numbers which were not part of Ančerl’s Supraphon recording of extracts from the suites but since I don’t have access to that recording I can’t say which these items are.

I must confess that I don’t much like Ančerl’s way with the very opening of ‘Montagues and Capulets’. As each tier of the brass discord is added the players produce a distinct accent (in all other recording in my collection the tiers are added more smoothly). More seriously, he makes a distinct break as the discord changes so that there are two quite separate chords (CD 3, track 5 0’20"). However, I’m happy to report that thereafter there are no other things with which one could take issue.

The main music of the ‘Montagues and Capulets’ movement is menacingly jaunty, as it should be. The pacing and gait seem just right to me. The slower flute-led variant (track 5, 3’32") is a most delicate interlude here. There’s some very supple string and wind playing in ‘Madrigal’ (track 7) and a couple of delightfully tipsy brass and wind solos in ‘Masques’ (track 9).

The Leipzig violins cope very well with Prokofiev’s cruelly exposed lines in ‘Romeo and Juliet’ (track 10). In this performance the searing emotion is built up and sustained very well, though not all listeners will like the piercing first trumpet (e.g. at 3’09"). This is music of shattering intensity (even more so in the complete ballet, which surely is Prokofiev’s masterpiece) and Ančerl has the measure of it (did he ever conduct the ballet in the theatre, I wonder?). The concluding ‘Death of Tybalt’ is as scorching as it should be. The animal excitement of the fight between Romeo and Tybalt comes across and the Capulet’s cortège is superbly dramatic. I’d have preferred a slightly broader tempo to convey to the full the dreadful nature of what has just occurred but even so this performance is still pretty potent stuff.

This is now the third volume of Tahra’s Karel Ančerl edition to come my way. I think it’s a little more uneven than the others but there is still a great deal to enjoy in it, not least the sparkling Dvořák disc. What this set does do is reinforce the image of Karel Ančerl as a first-rate conductor. He was a scrupulous musician, always well prepared and though undoubtedly possessed of a strong personality (how else would he have survived the concentration camps?) he never sought to impose that personality to the detriment of the music. He was, in short, an artist one could respect and admire and Tahra have put us in their debt by making available so much rare and interesting material.

A substantial, well-illustrated booklet containing comprehensive essays in French and Italian accompanies this set. As I’ve indicated, the sound quality varies somewhat due, no doubt, to the age and provenance of some of the source material. However, the sound is never less than acceptable and Tahra’s transfers are very good. Devotees of this fine conductor will be keen to acquire this set. For the more general collector some judicious sampling prior to purchase might be prudent. However, make no mistake this is a significant set and, despite my reservations about the Schubert (which others may well not share) I am happy to recommend it.

John Quinn

See also review by Jonathan Woolf


































































Making a Donation to MusicWeb

Writing CD reviews for MWI

About MWI
Who we are, where we have come from and how we do it.

Site Map

How to find a review

How to find articles on MusicWeb
Listed in date order

Review Indexes
   By Label
      Select a label and all reviews are listed in Catalogue order
   By Masterwork
            Links from composer names (eg Sibelius) are to resource pages with links to the review indexes for the individual works as well as other resources.

Themed Review pages

Jazz reviews


      Composer surveys
      Unique to MusicWeb -
a comprehensive listing of all LP and CD recordings of given works
Prepared by Michael Herman

The Collector’s Guide to Gramophone Company Record Labels 1898 - 1925
Howard Friedman

Book Reviews

Complete Books
We have a number of out of print complete books on-line

With Composers, Conductors, Singers, Instumentalists and others
Includes those on the Seen and Heard site


Nostalgia CD reviews

Records Of The Year
Each reviewer is given the opportunity to select the best of the releases

Monthly Best Buys
Recordings of the Month and Bargains of the Month

Arthur Butterworth Writes

An occasional column

Phil Scowcroft's Garlands
British Light Music articles

Classical blogs
A listing of Classical Music Blogs external to MusicWeb International

Reviewers Logs
What they have been listening to for pleasure



Bulletin Board

Give your opinions or seek answers

Pat and present

Helpers invited!

How Did I Miss That?

Currently suspended but there are a lot there with sound clips

Composer Resources

British Composers

British Light Music Composers

Other composers

Film Music (Archive)
Film Music on the Web (Closed in December 2006)

Programme Notes
For concert organizers

External sites
British Music Society
The BBC Proms
Orchestra Sites
Recording Companies & Retailers
Online Music
Agents & Marketing
Other links
Web News sites etc

A pot-pourri of articles

MW Listening Room
MW Office

Advice to Windows Vista users  
Site History  
What they say about us
What we say about us!
Where to get help on the Internet
CD orders By Special Request
Graphics archive
Currency Converter
Web Ring
Translation Service

Rules for potential reviewers :-)
Do Not Go Here!
April Fools

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.