Amongst the many recommendable discs now emerging from 
          Australian Eloquence is this DG issue devoted to the two most outstanding 
          Beethoven trios. The three instrumentalists were of differing musical 
          backgrounds. Fournier, a cellist in the Franco-Belgian school, Szeryng 
          a Flesch pupil, though certain aspects of his playing seem over time 
          to have migrated to a more French position (notably his bowing) and 
          Kempff himself, trained as organist and composer and solidly Germanic 
          in his training in Potsdam, under his professor, Barth, and in Berlin. 
          Their stylistic unity however is resoundingly evident and no disjunctive 
          pressures detract from it. 
        
 
        
The Ghost Trio opens with nicely trenchant accents 
          and with some yielding string phrasing. Unusually there is also some 
          remarkably uncontrolled vibrato usage from Szeryng – most unlike him 
          – which, since he repeats the phrase he must mean but which sounds distinctly 
          unattractive to my ears. Szeryng was a magisterially superior player 
          but one occasionally prone to rather faceless playing. It is Kempff 
          who leads the harmonic winding of the first movement and the three musicians 
          are constantly alive to the profile of each movement – and not just 
          the extraordinary Largo assai where the string players succeed 
          in heightening what the sleeve note writer, Carl Rosman, calls "spectral 
          wanderings" through the use of some aristocratically reserved phrasing. 
          The finale is bright and bustlingly buoyant, all three players equally 
          assured. 
        
 
        
The greatest of the trios, the Archduke, receives 
          a less comprehensively admirable performance. For all the technical 
          address, the tonal variety and confidence, I find the first movement 
          afflicted by an almost imperceptible laissez faire. It never 
          seems really to activate as it should, responses are muted, discourse 
          operating at a relatively low level of engagement. In the slow movement 
          there is some artificial sounding phrasing and a consistent lack of 
          real depth - a feeling of the movement being over manicured with some 
          over emphatic and mannered staccato playing from Fournier in his exchanges 
          with Szeryng, who, whilst technically irreproachable, sounds bland. 
          The finale is taken at a very deliberate tempo – emphasising Beethoven’s 
          moderato marking certainly but at the expense of motoric conviction. 
          As a result the sectionality of the movement is emphasised but Kempff 
          can be very loud here – I don’t think this entirely the fault of the 
          recording – and occasionally splashy as well. There is something unattractively 
          ponderous about it all for all the excellence of the string phrasing. 
          And whilst one is alerted to the harmonically ingenious writing it is 
          to the detriment of the musical argument. The ending is also rather 
          thrown away. Not an Archduke in the same league as the Kogan-Rostropovich-Gilels, 
          I’m afraid. 
        
 
        
I admired the Ghost but found the Archduke 
          frustrating at almost every turn – so a very cautious recommendation 
          for the former in the light of the latter. 
        
 
        
        
Jonathan Woolf