> SHOSTAKOVICH Symphony 4 Chung [TB]: Classical CD Reviews- Jun2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

Dimitri SHOSTAKOVICH (1906-1975)
Symphony No. 4
Philadelphia Orchestra/Myung-Whun Chung
Recorded November 1994, Memorial Hall, Philadelphia
DG 447 759-2 [60.33]

 


BUY NOW 

AmazonUK   AmazonUS

 


Shostakovich's Fourth Symphony is an extraordinary work by any standards. It is cast in three movements, with each of the outer two approaching half an hour in duration, astride a shorter central scherzo. Together these occupy a playing time in excess of an hour. There is a huge orchestra, of some 140 players, so the range of timbres and colours is very wide indeed, and the climaxes are overwhelmingly powerful. But more significant than any of these issues is the nature of the music itself, since the development is flexible and remarkably open-ended, veering this way and that, through passages slow and fast, thinly scored and richly powerful. It is a roller-coaster ride for both the musicians and the audience.

No wonder the Symphony has enjoyed a chequered career. Shostakovich withdrew it in 1936, when it was already in rehearsal for its first performance. This decision had more to do with the attack on him by Stalin in the pages of Pravda than with musical problems during the rehearsal period. For after Stalin had launched his vitriolic feelings - 'Not music but a mess' - about the opera Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, the composer knew he was a marked man. And a challenging, modernist symphony was not a wise proposition. So the Fourth did not receive its premiere until 1961, a full 25 years after it was written, and Shostakovich achieved a rehabilitation with his Fifth Symphony of 1937: 'A Soviet Artist's Response to Just Criticism'. (Of course the nature of the Fifth and whether that title is a decoy is another matter altogether.)

The Fourth Symphony has fared rather well as far as recordings are concerned. Any live performance has to be a special occasion because of the costs involved in assembling such a large orchestra, and perhaps that is why live performances have often been linked with recordings. In this, his first purely orchestral symphony for ten years, Shostakovich wrote the music he wanted to write. The style follows that of the opera Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk and the ballet The Bolt, and is therefore expressively potent and orchestrally colourful. The very opening confirms all this, and immediately throws down the gauntlet to the recording engineers, with the huge percussive chord that follows the opening phrase. The DG recording is spectacular and meets every requirement: it is sensitive to detail and has a full and accurate dynamic range. In fact it is the best thing about the whole enterprise.

The challenges in performing this music are twofold: the orchestra must reach heights of discipline and virtuosity, and the conductor must hold the music in a vision of symphonic continuum and growth. This performance fares better on the first of these points, I feel, than on the second. For the Philadelphia Orchestra plays magnificently, both as individuals and as a team. Myung-Whun Chung is an artist of the front rank, with an acclaimed recording of Lady Macbeth to his credit. However, I am not entirely convinced by his interpretation of the Symphony.

Listen to any part of the work as a demonstration-quality excerpt and it will sound pretty impressive. But there is more symphonic strength in the score than Chung finds here. Several times his choice of phrasing misses the mark by dashing ahead with too little concern for articulation, and the inner relationships of the parts do not build up their subtle significances. Of course these things are to some extent a matter of how the individual listener who knows the music feels that it should sound. And any great symphony is greater than any one performance of it. But for this listener at least, Chung does not pass the acid test, that in performance the music sounds as if it could not possibly be performed otherwise.

That said, there are some aspects which are spectacularly effective. The first movement's fast string fugue at tempo Presto, for example, is an amazing feat of virtuosity, while the central movement is nicely atmospheric, particularly the diminuendo during the closing phase. The final powerful climax is hugely sonorous, and has probably never sounded better on disc. Therefore the tragic descent towards the dark coda makes its impression too.

Quite why the performance was recorded eight years ago and only released now we do not know. It is well worth hearing, but then so too are many other performances of this remarkable work, including for example those by Simon Rattle, Mstislav Rostropovich, Kirill Kondrashin, Neeme Järvi, and by the same Philadelphia Orchestra with Eugene Ormandy conducting. For all its strange, even bizarre characteristics, the Fourth is perhaps Shostakovich's greatest symphony. In truth, the best performance of it should always be 'the next one'.

Terry Barfoot

 


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.