> Edward Elgar - Arthur Bliss [JW]: Classical CD Reviews- June2002 MusicWeb(UK)

MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around 2024
60,000 reviews
... and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here Acte Prealable Polish CDs
 

Presto Music CD retailer
 
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

MusicWeb is now part of See what else is on offer


Edward ELGAR (1857-1934)
Violin Concerto *
Arthur BLISS (1891-1975)

Theme and Cadenza for solo violin and orchestra +
Introduction and Allegro
Alfredo Campoli, violin
London Philharmonic Orchestra conducted by Adrian Boult *
London Symphony Orchestra conducted by Arthur Bliss +
Recorded 1955 (Elgar) 1956 (Bliss)
DECCA ELOQUENCE 461 353-2 [63.52]

www.buywell.com

The Elgar Concerto has fared well on disc. There are very few poor performances and a number that have, on their own terms, real merit. At the peak stands the Sammons – newly reissued on Naxos – and it will be interesting to see if this latest appearance deals with the persistent pitch transfer problems that have bedevilled its various incarnations. Somewhat hors de combat is the Menuhin-Elgar. Hugh Bean’s performance is profoundly attractive as is this Campoli reissue, which dates from 1955 and is one of the most outstanding recordings ever made of the concerto.

Though the sound can be a little papery in places nothing can dim the masterly exposition of the orchestral introduction by Boult, a far more eloquent traversal than those he was able to offer the disappointing Menuhin, in his second recording, or the impossibly sluggish Ida Haendel. He is especially successful at bringing out the wind writing, superbly weighted and proportionate to the orchestral canvas, and each sectional incident is blazingly well realised. Campoli’s entrance is reflective but not over lingering in the modern manner and which can be so disruptive to the syntax of the musical argument. He employs some judicious expressive devices to heighten his playing. At 6’00 the orchestral counter theme to his solo line is movingly audible even at Campoli’s slowing tempo – compare and contrast with such as Nigel Kennedy where the necessary backbone is entirely missing and nonsense is made of Elgar’s orchestration. Campoli makes the most elegant and apposite of slides at 11’01 – quick, lyrical, with just the right weight and speed. Boult’s control of orchestral dynamics from 14’30 – readying for the subsequent orchestral outburst – is but one example of his elevated level of conducting. Campoli’s passagework comes under a little strain here and at 16’15 I felt the imposed strain by Campoli to be a little forced and impeding to the flow toward the summit of the movement. He just doesn’t sweep forward enough. But it is an internally consistent view of the movement and one that commands respect.

The slow movement is deeply expressive and fluent; it tends to show up performances (such as, say, Heifetz’s), which fail to maintain a proper balance between momentum and expressivity. Campoli’s tone is ardent without over emoting. The finale is of a piece with the other movements; Boult’s conducting is alert and sympathetic and Campoli’s surmounting of the fiendish technical demands - which is not, in truth, absolute - is still outstandingly good. It’s only when one compares Campoli with Sammons that the breathtaking control of the latter makes Campoli seem just a little staid. There is again not the onward rush and sweep of the Sammons performance; there is not the sense of an unstoppable momentum, the big tone leading a galvanized orchestra to the final triumphant chords. Nevertheless this is a most distinguished recording; putting aside Sammons and Menuhin it is my preferred choice, just ahead of Bean, and I can pay Campoli no greater compliment than to say that his tonal beauty, his awareness of structure and the dictates of architectural compromise, are of the highest quality and this performance is testament to his stature as a great violinist.

The coupling is cannily chosen given Campoli’s close association with Arthur Bliss. He was the dedicatee of the Violin concerto, which he recorded and of which he gave some famous Russian performances on tour with the composer. The Theme and cadenza for solo violin and orchestra is a lyrical and beautifully played piece derived from incidental music composed for a 1945 BBC production of a radio play by Bliss’ wife, Trudy. Bliss also conducts an infectious performance of his 1926 Introduction and Allegro (revised 1937), composed for Stokowski’s Philadelphians. Bustling, inventive, rhythmically propulsive with superb wind writing and juddering strings it makes a resounding finale to a significant and unreservedly recommendable disc.

Jonathan Woolf


Return to Index

Error processing SSI file