> Beethoven - Symphony no.9 [GPJ]: Classical CD Reviews- June2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett

MusicWeb is now part of See what else is on offer


Ludwig Van BEETHOVEN (1770-1827)
Symphony no.9 in d minor op. 125 "Choral"

Karita Mattila, soprano, Violeta Urmana, mezzo-soprano, Thomas Moser, tenor, Thomas Quasthoff, bass, Swedish Radio Choir, Eric Ericson Chamber Choir Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra /Claudio Abbado
Recorded Berlin Philharmonie Grosser Saal, April 2000
DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON 471 491-2 [62:19]


BUY NOW 

AmazonUK   AmazonUS

The changes in the playing and the sound of the great Berlin Philharmonic that have come about since Claudio Abbado took over are demonstrated strikingly in the opening bars of this fine version of the 9th Symphony. As compared with Karajan’s days, the sound is clear, precise; every demi-semiquaver is articulated, details in the orchestration that used to be lost behind swathes of string sound now emerge with ease, and, above all, the attack is hard-edged (where appropriate); Karajan liked even sforzandi to possess an elegant roundness, a sort of unanimous, controlled lack of precision – a paradox, I know, but an undoubted feature of Karajan’s distinctive approach.

That has gone, now, and the effect is bracing. There is also a smaller scale to the sound, tighter and more in keeping with Beethoven’s era. The overall result is closer to chamber music on a grand scale, which is what it should be, of course. This isn’t to say that this reading is under-powered; the recapitulation of the main theme (Track 1 around 7:45) is thunderously impressive, all the more so as it follows on from the intimacy of the preceding woodwind exchanges. One passage struck me as a fine example of the gains of Abbado’s method; in the coda, there is a wonderful moment where the strings take up a phrase from the first subject, building it to forte and back down again (Track 1, 12:20 to 12:50). Throughout, little semiquaver phrases are tossed back and forth between woodwind soloists. In every other performance I have heard, whether live or on disc, these phrases become lost as the strings grow louder; not here – every one is audible, so fine is Abbado’s ear for balance.

Comparing the Scherzo with Karajan’s 1962 version was revealing. Karajan is faster (not by much) in the main sections, but Abbado much quicker in the Trio, where he risks pushing the music – certainly the first horn sounds a little less than comfortable in his solo. Similarly in the slow movement, where many conductors broaden out for the lovely second theme (call this the post-Brucknerian approach if you like!), Abbado presses on, refusing to let the music lose its forward motion. Again, here and there, the players sound a little rushed, as if they would like more time to shape the phrases lovingly. The orchestra is too fine for the ensemble to become ragged, but the whole thing is clearly a learning curve for them, too. The pay-off is that the structure of the movement becomes more lucid, but maybe just a little of the mystery of that sublime coda goes missing.

In the finale, many of the same virtues are present. The most striking aspect of the performance is the presentation of the ‘Joy’ theme in the ‘celli and basses. Abbado asks them to play so softly that they are virtually inaudible, a risky ploy. I can see his reason; this theme is now, sadly, too well-known for its own good - a conductor must somehow catch the significance of its appearance, and in a live performance, I can see that this could be wonderfully effective. The danger in a recording is that it will have the listener simply diving for the volume control, only to be blown out of his/her seat a few minutes later!

Abbado has assembled an excellent team of soloists; Quasthoff is quite splendid in his first recitative and presents the theme in an ideal way. Not so convincing is the tenor, Thomas Moser, who sounds a little out of breath in his marching solo, and produces a disappointing high Bb. The soprano Karita Mattila, is good, but in the famous quartet near the end, sounds rushed with her phrases, and her high B is less than top-notch. Again harking back to 1962, Karajan of course had then the incomparable Gundula Janowitz, whose phrasing of this passage, and the way she approaches the climactic high note, is a model for any singer – stunning!

If you are tempted to dismiss Abbado as a speed-merchant, just remember that the same objections were raised to Karajan’s performances in earlier days, not to mention Norrington’s, and listen to the comparatively sedate tempo Abbado adopts for the great double-fugue in the finale. This is part of a grand plan which allows him to graduate the changes of tempo highly effectively, concluding with the final breathless charge.

Is there such a thing as a perfect ‘Choral’? Probably not; but this is a particularly fine one, which I suspect will stand the test of time. As a performance, it steers a convincing path between more traditional approaches and ‘period’ versions of more recent times.

Gwyn Parry-Jones


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.