> Dvorak New World Ancerl [CH]: Classical CD Reviews- Aug 2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Bedřich SMETANA (1824-1884)
The Bartered Bride: Overture
Antonín DVOŘÁK (1841-1904)

Symphony no. 9 in e, op. 95 – "From the New World"
Modest MUSSORGSKY (1839-1881) arr. Maurice RAVEL

Pictures at an Exhibition

Czech Philharmonic Orchestra/Karel Ančerl

Recorded live 10.10.1958, Lugano, Switzerland
For information visit www.aura-music.com
AURA 151-2 [74’59"]
Midprice (UK) SuperBudget (USA)


BUY NOW 

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS

How times change. When I began collecting records in the 1960s Karel Ančerl’s “New World” was available from Supraphon and was not highly regarded. Edward Greenfield, in a Radio 3 survey of available "New Worlds" even dismissed it as "a rather dull performance", and the early editions of the Penguin Guide to Bargain Records had it well down in the list. Nowadays there are critics who rate it as the finest “New World” ever and most companies specialising in the reissue of radio archive material try to have an Ančerl “New World” in their books.

Has it changed or have we? Well, it can’t have changed so we must have. For one thing, in those days a "normal" "New World" went in for a wide range of speeds in the outer movements, with the flute theme in the first movement, in particular, frequently bringing the music to a standstill. Any new recording which did this would probably be condemned on principle and certain red-blooded romantic recordings that were mainstays of the LP catalogue, the Fricsay for instance, have seen their numbers go down. At the other end of the spectrum was the Toscanini which blew away the cobwebs of tradition and was widely venerated for doing so. This was my introduction to the work and it took a long time before I could accept and eventually prefer other more gentle but equally un-romantic views. In this context a performance which played the score as faithfully as Toscanini but without his fearsome energy risked being dismissed as blandly unimaginative.

The Lugano performance recorded here is certainly a thoroughly energetic affair, with noisy brass climaxes that have you wondering if Ančerl had been listening to Toscanini. The first movement bowls along splendidly, the lyrical melodies beautifully phrased with little concession over tempo. The “largo” is taken at a flowing speed and is notable for the way in which the “piů mosso” sections move on more than we usually hear. However, though I wouldn’t call this bland, it seems to me to lack the spell-binding qualities of another recently revived performance, also underestimated in its day, that by Nikolai Malko. Timings are not everything but Malko, in the 12’20" of his 1956 Philharmonia recording (CZS 7243 5 75121 2), let alone in the 13’39" of his quite miraculously beautiful 1948 Danish State Radio Orchestra recording (DACOCD 549-550) finds so much more in the music than Ančerl in his 10’27”.

If there is a movement in which the Czechs seem to possess some secret denied to the rest of us it is the third, where they quite rightly recognise that the trio is more of a fast sousedskà than a waltz – hear how the third beat is sprung. The finale is also very fine with all Dvořák’s references to themes from earlier movements beautifully balanced against each other and sounding properly symphonic for once. I reacted in a similar way to Malko’s finale, however (this time with a preference for the Philharmonia version) and felt that his more spacious approach gave one more time to savour the music. So it was disconcerting to discover that there is only 2 seconds’ difference between them! Checking them side by side I concluded that Ančerl gives the impression of more speed because he sometimes moves ahead impetuously, and draws back slightly in the clarinet theme, whereas Malko’s steady beat has the effect that after a time you don’t notice the tempo at all and simply hear the music. I also noticed that, while the Czech strings may be wonderful no one could accuse their trumpeter of subtlety and their clarinettist lacks the liquid beauty of the London player’s tone.

All in all, then, while this is certainly a fine "New World" it doesn’t seem to me to possess those special qualities that its provenance might lead you to expect. The recording is really very good for the date. Alas, at the beginning of the "Bartered Bride" overture the engineers seem to have been caught still positioning the mikes and there are some bumps and squeaks during the opening bars. A sizzling performance, maybe just a little too fast for ideal clarity, given the reverberant acoustic.

The truly enthralling performance here is actually the Mussorgsky, a swift and vividly characterised reading. It is clear from the outset that Ančerl is not going to hang around and in some of the faster movements – “Limoges” and “The Hut on Fowl’s Legs” – the players take off in flights of collective frenzy, while this is one of the rare performances in which the "Old Castle" does not seem too long. The two Jews are thoroughly acrimonious and the control over the dynamics in "Catacombs" is notable.

Fine as all this is, in the last resort I can’t quite claim buried treasure status for it. Ančerl’s interpretations of these works are already known in stereo versions, and he was pretty consistent between one performance and another. New additions to the Ančerl discography will be warmly welcomed and can I point out that, if a Dvořák “Te Deum” is not available from Czech sources, Italian Radio have a Turin performance of it with Marcella Pobbe and Nicola Rossi-Lemeni as soloists, in which he drew string playing from the local orchestra of a vibrancy not far behind that of the CPO itself.

Christopher Howell


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.