> GLAZUNOV , GOEDICKE Piano concertos [TB]: Classical CD Reviews- Oct 2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Golden Age singers

Nimbus on-line




Faure songs
Charlotte de Rothschild (soprano);

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Alexander GLAZUNOV (1865-1936)
Piano No. 1 in F minor, Opus 92 (1911)
Piano Concerto No. 2, Opus 100 (1916)
Alexander GOEDICKE (1877-1957)

Conzertstück in D major, Opus 11 (1900)
Stephen Coombs (piano)
BBC Scottish Symphony Orchestra/Martyn Brabbins
Rec 11-12 January 1996
The Romantic Piano Concerto - 13
HYPERION CDA66877 [65.38]


BUY NOW 

Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS


Stephen Coombs has made Glazunov's piano music a central part of his repertoire. His recorded performances of the complete works for solo piano drew high praise. So too are these performances of the two concertos notable achievements.

Glazunov came to the concerto relatively late. A prolific composer from his teenage years, he had already written the symphonies which dominate his creative output, as well as the magnificent ballet scores Raymonda and The Seasons, before he turned to these piano concertos. The Violin Concerto dates from the mid-1900s, so the same point applies to that piece too, if not quite so strongly.

These ideas are not without importance, since three of Rachmaninov's piano concertos had been written by the time of Glazunov's Concerto No. 1. Despite the boldly original form, the music remains in the shadow of Rachmaninov's style, though, to be fair, Glazunov does idiomatically share the richly romantic outlook of the post-Tchaikovsky generation of Russian composers (he was eight years older than Rachmaninov). His orchestral writing is as opulent and imaginative as we would expect, and the piano part balances imaginatively with it. Anyone who enjoys this kind of musical indulgence - and most of us do - will enjoy Glazunov's concertos.

The first movement has a splendid sweep, with a gloriously lyrical second theme which receives the full treatment. All praise, therefore, to the Hyperion recording for conveying this so indulgently. The second and final movement is an extended theme and variations, using titles such as 'eroica', 'quasi una fantasia' and 'mazurka'. It is as if Glazunov was prompting himself to compose the music from a preconceived plan. But the concerto does sound a good deal more spontaneous than this, and both Coombs and Brabbins respond to its shadings, the ebb and flow of tension and relaxation.

There is a tendency in the First Concerto to emphasise the romantic expression and the lyrical flow, perhaps at the expense of displaying the technical display which must remain a priority in a romantic piano concerto. These thoughts are paramount also in the Second Concerto, whose highlight is a central Andante of thoughtful construction and deeply felt emotion; it is therefore very Russian. The opulent recorded sound emphasises these characteristics, and may be responsible to some extent for the (relative) failure of the more lively outer movements to provide the kind of excitement which the indulgence of romantic virtuosity might demand. One wonders whether a little more drive and power might have brought dividends.

There are no such worries in the shorter concluding item, the Conzertstück by Alexander Goedicke. Despite living on to 1957, he composed this piece as early as 1900, a decade before Glazunov wrote his piano concertos. Goedicke, born in Moscow in 1877, was the cousin of Nikolai Medtner, in whose shadow posterity has left him. But he was a musical talent in his own right, who from 1909 served as professor of piano at the Moscow Conservatoire.

According to Francis Pott's thorough and well written insert notes, Goedicke's creative efforts were most successful in the earlier part of his career, and the Conzertstück is therefore a typical example. It is a somewhat diffuse piece, whose structure relies considerably on the motto theme with which it opens. The piano writing tends to be complex and decorative, and Stephen Coombs responds to it enthusiastically and directly, playing with much brilliance. Although this is in no sense a major work, it is most engaging, and its addition to the catalogue in this, its only recording, is therefore welcome.


Terry Barfoot


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.