> MENDELSSOHN, BRAHMS vc Szigeti [JW]: Classical CD Reviews- May2002 MusicWeb(UK)






Aureole etc.




Nimbus on-line




If it’s the Czech works you’re after, do not hesitate

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Classical Editor: Rob Barnett


Felix MENDELSSOHN (1809-1847)
Violin Concerto *
Johannes BRAHMS (1833-1897)

Violin Concerto
Joseph Szigeti, violin
London Philharmonic/Thomas Beecham *
Halle Orchestra/Hamilton Harty
Recorded September 1933 (Mendelssohn), December 1928 (Halle)
NAXOS HISTORICAL 8.110948 [64’12]
Superbudget

BUY NOW 

AmazonUK   AmazonUS

 


My advice is to start with the Brahms. Not that the Mendelssohn is a poor performance – far from it – but it does go some way to bearing out Albert Sammons’ contention that there are more poor performances of the Mendelssohn by good violinists than of any other major concerto in the repertoire. This was one of three Concerto recordings Szigeti made with Beecham and the LPO – the others were the discographical first, Prokofiev No 1, and a most beautiful Mozart K218 – and by some distance the weakest. Graceful and attractive though it is, these features also co-exist with some tonal limitations and technical frailties sufficient to limit its place in the hierarchy of great recordings of this work.

Szigeti had a tightly focused tone and a characteristically slow vibrato, endemic to Hubay pupils, and to which he devoted considerable attention after his early wunderkind years. His portamenti are quick, the tone a little tremulous in the first movement of the Mendelssohn and the passagework exposes some chinks in his technical armoury. In the slow movement he employs rather more slides in the opening paragraph than many of his contemporaries and some throbbingly emotive lower string passages (which, because of that slow vibrato, are a little problematic). Some of the playing here is a little smeary but nothing is overly sentimentalised. The finale is the best played of the movements, with the LPO in crisp and affectionate form and Szigeti serves up some witty and warmly persuasive playing. I like the way Beecham propels the orchestral counter themes – projected in addition with warmth as well as clarity. There’s nothing over studied or over assertive in a finale often used as a vehicle for velocity.

It is the Brahms however that receives one of the most outstanding recordings made of the Concerto. Criticism has often been levelled at the Halle in this recording and in particular at the oboist, whom Tully Potter notes was Alec Whittaker, soon to be poached from the Halle by the marauding BBC. In addition the string section employ a massed, uniform series of portamenti at various points which can impart a decidedly tremulous air to some of the orchestral expositions. Nevertheless the orchestral patina is distinctive, individual and rampantly engaged and Whittaker’s pre-Goossens playing is stylistically and historically important. In the portamento laden first movement orchestral tutti, for example, the strings’ aesthetic is not dissimilar in intent – though undeniably distinct in execution from - the soloist’s. Szigeti’s robust, if small, tone doesn’t indulge in nearly as much portamenti as he was to do a few years later in the Mendelssohn. He projects his line with admirable and rugged surety. Harty encourages a triumphantly cohesive performance – listen, in passing, to the basses’ momentum for example. The wind section may sound thin but there is a tonal conformity to the blend. In the second movement, following Whittaker’s solo, Szigeti unravels his never gluttonous resources and as the movement develops we can hear the subtlety with which he increasingly deploys finger position changes and the most fleet of portamenti and how he never lavishes tone and sacrifices architectural design and how much more effective and convincing his understanding is as a result. In the finale his accents are robust, excellently attacked and with Harty (whose Concerto Szigeti had premiered in 1908) they drive to a triumphantly, if not always impeccably, overwhelming conclusion.

Transfers are good – preserving Szigeti’s famously split note toward the end of the Mendelssohn slow movement – and make this disc, at least for the Brahms, mandatory listening.

Jonathan Woolf


Return to Index

Untitled Document


Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.