> MAHLER Symphony 5 Conlon [TB]: Classical CD Reviews- May2002 MusicWeb(UK)

One of the most grown-up review sites around

54,416 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Gustav MAHLER (1860-1911)
Symphony No. 5
Gurzenich Orchestra Cologne
James Conlon
Rec September 1994, StudioStraáe, Cologne
EMI Classics 5 74979-2 [71.04]


Crotchet AmazonUK   AmazonUS


Neville Cardus memorably described Mahler's Fifth Symphony as 'one of the seven wonders of the musical world'. From this it can be taken that any performance by a good quality orchestra and conductor will reveal insights into this miraculous score. And so it proves here, even if the Cologne orchestra does not immediately suggest the Mahlerian pedigree of the Vienna Philharmonic, the New York Philharmonic or the Concertgebouw.

In fact it was this Cologne orchestra who gave the first performance of Mahler 5, so their recording from 1994 takes on a special meaning. Not that the present generation of musicians has much, if anything, to do with those players who appeared under Mahler's baton. But at least it is a nice touch, the more so since the orchestra has maintained its proud traditions in the intervening period of a century or so.

James Conlon has built a distinguished record as a conductor, both in live performances and through recordings, and his Mahler displays a sure control and a deft touch. His tempi are direct, generating a symphonic impulse which is full of momentum. The work is cast in three parts, with the first pair and the last pair of movements thematically and expressively linked. At the heart of the Symphony lies what Mahler described as 'the very devil of a scherzo'. This large-scale movement, some twenty minutes in dureation, is in fact the jewel in the crown of Conlon's performance.

Following the composer's advice, the tempo here is steady rather than fast, so that the rhythms achieve due impact in building the music's strength. From this basic pulse the contrasting waltz material achieves a natural sense of growth and flow, beautifully balanced in the perspective of the recording. This procedure, allied with the nature of the recorded sound, generally tends to suit the more intimate aspects of the music better than the richly textured or the virtuoso aspects of the score. For example, the starring role of the trumpet makes less impression than it might. This is apparent from the very first bar, when there is a decided reticence about the instrument's recorded balance, though the playing seems assured enough.

For there is room for more richness in the sound spectrum than EMI provides. In particular the strings lack bloom, and it is difficult to tell whether the fault lies in the recording or the playing. The famous Adagietto for strings and harp provides the obvious focus for consideration, and whatever the tenderness and compassion in the phrasing and tempo, the sound itself can make more impression that it does in this recording. Rather better is the finale, whose momentum and contrapuntal ingenuity drive the music along. Here and elsewhere the percussion make their point, and in many respects the timpanist steals the show. But in general terms there is decided lack of heart, although boosting the volume does help.

This is a powerful and a complex work, one which demands high standards from all involved, including the attentiveness of the audience. Mahler knew of the music's complexities, saying 'would that the first performance could be given fifty years after my death'. And in a sense he was right, since it was only during the 1960s with the popularity of the long-playing record that the 'Mahler boom' really began.

As ever with this composer, the symphony proves to be a journey traversing the struggles of doubt and belief, through this world and toward the mystery which is the next. As such the music needs to command the indulgence and commitment of the listener, as moreover it does the technique and artistry of the players. Despite many fine things, this performance cannot rate with the best, with for example Barbirolli (EMI), Bernstein (DG) or Inbal (Denon). What is more, the accompanying booklet is frankly inadequate, with notes which are all too brief and generalised, along with a preference for design over content.

While this performance undoubtedly has its merits, in the final analysis neither the music making, the recorded sound nor the general presentation ranks among the highest standards to be found in this repertoire.

Terry Barfoot


Return to Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.