> Galina Ustvolskaya - Piano Concerto [HC]: Classical CD Reviews- July2002 MusicWeb(UK)

MusicWeb International One of the most grown-up review sites around 2024
60,000 reviews
... and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here Acte Prealable Polish CDs

Presto Music CD retailer
Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Galina USTVOLSKAYA (born 1919)
Piano Concerto (1946)a
Symphony No.1 (1955)b
Oleg Malov (piano)a; Boris Pinkhasovich, Pavel Semagin (trebles)b; Ural Philharmonic Orchestra; Dmitri Liss
Recorded: Yekaterinenburg Philharmonia, April 2000
MEGADISC MDC 7856 [38:38]


AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Galina Ustvolskaya has long been the Mystery Woman of Russian music. Little of her personal history was known whereas her music did not fare any better. She studied with Shostakovich who greatly admired her achievement. Nevertheless, later in life, she often expressed harsh comments on Shostakovich’s personality and work, to the point of disclaiming any influence of Shostakovich on her own music. Actually, she seems to live in a self-imposed isolation, refusing interviews and commissions, forbidding any analysis of her music which, according to her, should not be compared with any other. However, some musicians, such as the pianist Oleg Malov, championed her music which was progressively known in the West, though this only happened in the mid-1980s. Her reputation rests on a mere handful of highly personal works. There are actually twenty-one of them including some sizeable piano sonatas, pieces for various ensembles and five symphonies. Her list of works also includes four pieces written during the 1950s in a seemingly more traditional manner, more akin (so we are told) to Socialist Realism, though they did not make her better-known or appreciated, were it only by the State’s Nomenklatura.

One of the earliest works that she still acknowledges is the Concerto for Piano, Strings and Timpani completed in 1946 when she was a mere twenty-nine. Shostakovich’s shadow looms large over this impressive work that already points towards some later characteristics found in Ustvolskaya’s music, especially her reliance on ostinati and repetitive phrases (e.g. the coda of this concerto). It is cast in one single movement falling into three shorter sections: The dramatically intense first section, characterised by a declamatory theme for strings reminiscent of Shostakovich, leads into a slow, rather bleak meditation followed by a final section actually restating some of the earlier material and capped by an independent coda. This is a deeply serious piece of music from first to last, a substantial achievement on all counts; and one cannot but wonder why music of such emotional power and of such musical integrity has remained unheard and unrecorded for so many (too many!) long years.

Ustvolskaya’s output includes five symphonies, none of which really fits into the symphonic canon. All but the First have religious subtitles although they are definitely not religious works and are scored for rather unusual forces, but more on this in another review. However, the Symphony No.1, completed in 1955, is the only one to be scored for more or less traditional orchestral forces in which winds, brass and percussion are particularly prominent, the strings being confined to a secondary role. The structure of the piece however is quite unusual. The first movement is a short introduction, mostly for winds, made of massive sound pillars, some sort of hieratic chorale. The second movement, scored for two treble voices and orchestra, sets several short poems by the Italian Communist writer Gianni Rodari whose work was much admired in Russia during the Stalinist era. These texts evoke the fate of poor children, victims of the Capitalist world. The third movement is again for orchestra and ends with a bleak epilogue abruptly cut short. Curiously enough, the ideologically correct content of the texts used in the symphony did not earn the composer the regime’s approval, and the work received its first performance in 1966 only. If Shostakovich’s influence is clearly audible in the Piano Concerto, that of Stravinsky is much more in evidence in the First Symphony; but the Stravinsky of the Symphonies pour instruments à vent or the Symphony of Psalms. Nevertheless, from the emotional point of view, Ustvolskaya’s work is worlds apart from the intensely religious character of Stravinsky’s Symphony of Psalms. However, Ustvolskaya’s First Symphony is a beautiful work of great expressive power and, for all its unremitting bleakness, a quite impressive achievement.

This is a very fine release, superbly played by musicians who really believe in the music and give it dedicated, committed readings. Excellent recording and informative notes by Frans Lemaire. This is by far the finest introduction to Ustvolkaya’s unique sound world. A pity though that the total playing time is rather on the short side and it would have been most interesting if any or all of her other orchestral works could have been recorded, were it only to allow for a more comprehensive appraisal of her musical progress.

Hubert Culot

Return to Index

Error processing SSI file