What is a mezzo-soprano ?   
          part (1), 
          (2), 
          (3), 
          (4), 
          (5), 
          (6), 
          (7),(8),(9)] 
          
          What is a mezzo-soprano (10)?  
        
 
        
"What is a mezzo-soprano?" is a question 
          you may well ask if you look up the discography of Shéhérazade 
          and find that it has been recorded by singers such as Teyte, Crespin, 
          Norman, Ewing, Margaret Price and Hendricks, whom no one has ever suggested 
          may not be true sopranos, but also by Berganza, Baker and Horne. One 
          of the most successful interpreters has been Suzanne Danco, who is classified 
          as a soprano but who was particularly associated with roles such as 
          Cherubino which belong equally to sopranos and mezzos; this points towards 
          the existence of both borderline cases and borderline repertoire. Les 
          Nuits d’été, too, has been recorded by both sopranos 
          – Steber, de los Angeles, Crespin – and mezzos, including Baker and 
          Graham. Frederica von Stade herself has been particularly appreciated 
          on disc as Cherubino (with Karajan, 1979), as well as Dorabella (Lombard 
          1978) and Octavian (De Waart 1977), other roles which are allotted to 
          either voice type according to the conductor’s overall vision of the 
          work. But she has also been notably successful in certain roles, such 
          as Cendrillon (Rudel 1979), Hänsel (Pritchard 1979) and Mélisande 
          (Karajan 1980), which are normally taken by straight sopranos. Indeed, 
          in a recital disc issued in 1980 she included two Rossini arias – "Di 
          tanti palpiti" (Tancredi) and "Bel raggio lusinghier" 
          (Semiramide) of which the first is standard mezzo territory and 
          the second a famous war-horse of Sutherland and the like. For this disc 
          she was labelled as "soprano", but the "mezzo" soon 
          came back and is there today in large, elegant letters on her own website. 
          So which is she? 
        
 
        
What strikes the listener from this disc – and having 
          looked up a number of old reviews the same thing seems to have struck 
          critics all through her career – is the sheer evenness of her tone through 
          a wide range. She has a basically light (but not bodiless) timbre which 
          remains effortlessly the same up to a high B (the highest note on this 
          particular disc) where a mezzo often becomes heavy. But the really remarkable 
          thing is that this same sound which, heard in the middle register might 
          suggest a light soprano, extends equally effortlessly down towards middle 
          C, where a soprano would start mixing in chest tones to help out, and 
          then lower still. Though she is not a "dark" mezzo or a "quasi-contralto" 
          mezzo, I can hardly think of another mezzo who has such little recourse 
          to the chest voice below middle C. The same light, gentle timbre just 
          goes on down. 
        
 
        
As stated above, Sony provide no dates, but I can help 
          a little. The two Berlioz arias under Pritchard come from her first 
          recital disc, which was dedicated to French composers. Reviewing this 
          in Gramophone (July 1976) John Steane began by remarking that "Frederica 
          von Stade is one of those rare artists of whom one never seems to read 
          a bad or even a mildly critical review". Obviously he was not to 
          know that over the way at the EMG Monthly Letter an anonymous colleague 
          was busy writing just such a review! He then followed with an encomium 
          of her technique which expresses so exactly what I have just said above 
          that you will think I cribbed the lot. He pointed out that "the 
          voice is a genuine mezzo-soprano, neither a pushed-up contralto nor 
          a short-range soprano", that "she can call upon depth and 
          richness of tone, yet there is nothing plummy or chesty about the sound", 
          and that "the high notes are sung with ease and resonance". 
          And a whole lot more in equally positive vein. The reservations made 
          by the EMG Monthly Letter did not regard her ability to sing (for this 
          relief much thanks!) or even her French pronunciation (a happy hunting 
          ground for critics who have failed to find holes to pick elsewhere); 
          but it was suggested that she had shortcomings as an interpreter (in 
          which role Steane continued to admire her). Phrases such as "soporifically 
          dismal pace", "the interpretation is rather dead", "she 
          is without, at present, the art of characterization" and even "vulgar, 
          arch pronouncement" leap to the eye. To be fair, the Berlioz was 
          more liked, but I quote this nonetheless since the two opposing views 
          which, reconciled, might suggest that she produces an unfailingly beautiful 
          sound but doesn’t do very much with it interpretatively, have tended 
          to follow her ever since. 
        
 
        
Berlioz’s Les Nuits d’été is a 
          work which, notoriously, requires such a range of voices that no single 
          singer is likely to be equally successful in all six songs. A two-voice 
          version has been tried and the Berlioz conductor of the late 
          20th Century, Sir Colin Davis, divided it between four voices 
          for his epoch-making Philips cycle. But suppose all four voices were 
          not all equally good … In the present performance, made (or issued) 
          in 1984, it is as if the problem has not even occurred to the interpreters. 
          Ozawa knows well that Berlioz’s reputation as a white-hot revolutionary 
          enshrined a profound admiration for the classicism of Gluck, of Cherubini 
          and of Spontini. The conductor proceeds with a calm unflappability, 
          a serene monumentality which allows von Stade to float her exquisitely 
          even tone around every hurdle as if it did not exist. And there you 
          have it. Evenness. It all sounds the same. While theoretically applauding 
          the interpretative stance and recognising that this may be the best 
          sung version ever, I was plain bored stiff. The conductor sounds dead 
          on his feet and the performance is stillborn. Not that von Stade seems 
          other than content to leave things the way they are. 
        
 
        
England has had a notable Berlioz tradition (but goodness, 
          with Monteux and Münch so has Boston!). Pritchard was not its greatest 
          exponent but he knew very well that while Berlioz adulated Gluck, Cherubini 
          and Spontini, he was also a fanatical proponent of Beethoven, and there 
          is a certain Beethovenian drive and mobility to the proceedings. Pritchard 
          also tolerates a degree of imprecision that might have caused Ozawa 
          to wake up and protest, but at least there is life here. 
        
 
        
Back to Ozawa for a Shéhérazade from 
          1981. I put this on one side and came back to it a couple of days later, 
          hoping to find something I’d missed the first time. Alas, I still found 
          that the conductor’s static approach was one I just couldn’t engage 
          with. I haven’t got Crespin’s recording but I do have an off-the-air 
          tape of a 1970 Rome performance in which she is accompanied by the unjustly 
          forgotten (but not in Italy) Thomas Schippers. Here immediately I found 
          the nervous little hairpin crescendos and diminuendos, the sudden volatility 
          of a wind phrase, the homing in on a textural detail, which brings the 
          music to life. I can’t see that Crespin’s singing as such is superior 
          to von Stade’s, if anything it is a little more effortful, but the whole 
          context changes everything. So go to von Stade for beautiful singing, 
          and just that. Sad, isn’t it; both von Stade and Ozawa have the reputation 
          for being charming and engaging personalities in a profession where 
          bitchiness reigns, and yet twice over they seem to have gone to sleep 
          on the job. It makes you lose you faith in human nature. 
        
 
        
But wait a minute, why should this be the last word? 
          There is nothing more frustrating than spending a Saturday afternoon 
          searching for a review you are sure you have read not all that long 
          ago, but there it is. I wish I could quote chapter and verse but on 
          the occasion of a reissue of one of von Stade’s recordings the critic 
          began by referring to those singers who had briefly passed through our 
          lives, lightening them as they went. The idea being that von Stade has 
          come and gone. I must say that I, too, had rather supposed her to have 
          gently faded out. As you will have seen from the recordings mentioned 
          above, her recording career was intense from the late 1970s to the early 
          1980s. Such few records as have appeared in the last decade or so have 
          mostly been of musicals and the like, the sure refuge of a classical 
          singer with a failing voice. And yet it seems not to be. Her career 
          continues, on the stage and on the concert platform, and her much-delayed 
          Wigmore Hall debut took place on October 22nd of this year. 
          She is now 57, but a well-trained and properly husbanded voice, which 
          hers certainly seems to be, should still have several years’ life left 
          in it at that age. So instead of reissuing twenty-year-old recordings 
          which were unsuccessful through no fault of hers, why not record her 
          again in the two song cycles here, taking care to engage some bitchy, 
          foul-tempered martinet of a conductor guaranteed to bring proper conviction 
          to the proceedings? 
        
 
        
Christopher Howell