> Jean Sibelius - Symphony No. 2 & 3 [RB]: Classical Reviews- March 2002 MusicWeb(UK)

One of the most grown-up review sites around

54,928 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Jean SIBELIUS (1865-1957)
Symphony No. 2 (1902) [43.04]
Symphony No. 3 (1907) [26.31]
Vienna PO/Lorin Maazel
rec Sofiensaal, Vienna, Apr 1964, Mar-Apr 1968 ADD
ELOQUENCE (DECCA) 461 321-2 [69.42]


Crotchet   AmazonUK   AmazonUS http://www.buywell.com

Decca chose well, and unpredictably, in marrying up Maazel, the VPO and Sibelius when they decided to create a stereo cycle to supersede the still estimable Anthony Collins mono (Beulah if you can still find them). The VPO is not the orchestra you would naturally think of for Sibelius. In fact the Maazel cycle held its place very well from the 1960s until Ashkenazy's digital version moved it out of the premium price Decca list. Now, thanks to Cyrus Meher-Homji and Australian Universal, the seven symphonies have appeared at super-budget price on only three CDs.

It is no coincidence that the VPO/Maazel/Decca team recorded all the Tchaikovsky symphonies in the 1960s. Evidence of that can be heard in Maazel's Second which is stormily Tchaikovskian.

Detail after detail flits and sidles past the listener's ears and Maazel injects gallons of personality and adrenalin - hear the bark and accentuated grunt at the very start of the last movement. This is in marked contrast to the admittedly mono 1930s and 1940s Ormandy 1 and Stokowski 4 I have recently heard on Biddulph.

Maazel's are vivid, detailed and exciting performances with typically searching red-blooded Decca analogue sound to match. Time has told on the quality of the strings (particularly in No. 2) and they do not have quite the lustre at forte and above that I dimly recall from the LP set. Stereo separation however is satisfying and ear-catching. If you are able to listen to this with a score you will greatly appreciate the detailing. Less positive is the low wash of hiss (discernible in the Second which is the oldest recording in the seven) - a small evanescent factor in the face of such attack and vigour. The Third is given a big sound and feeling - far more so than many who bring out the chamber elements of the work. It stands at the parting of the ways from Sibelius's Russian nationalist phase. In fact hearing this performance you are far more aware of the exciting Russian rip-tide. The andantino spins along rather too speedily for my taste but doubts evaporate as the temperature climbs in the moderato - allegro ma non tanto. Listen to the amber-golden rolling gruffness of the horn-breakers at 7.43 in the finale.

This Maazel version of the Second is vibrant. It is a tad cooler in audio ambience and other terms than the broadly contemporary Barbirolli version (the RPO one on Chesky rather than the less exalted EMI/Hallé version).

The gap between the end of the Second Symphony and the start of the Third is substantial. Another mark of the artistic intelligence that guides the series.

Rob Barnett



Return to Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.