The SUK Symphony had its genesis during the Czech Quartet's English
	tour in 1897. The work-in-progress was shelved when the composer was commissioned
	to write the music for Julius Zeyer's Raduz and Mahulena. This is
	early Suk and is in an unsurprisingly Dvorakian track. As yet it is free
	from the darkening that changes charming invention into the gripping equivocality
	of Epilogue and Asrael. Dvorak's Ninth would go well with this
	work. In the allegro vivace the first gripings of Suk's eldritch side
	shudder into the spotlight. The Allegro is smooth and takes us towards
	Schubert's Great C major but with the snap and zest of the scherzo
	from Dvorak 5 and 6.
	
	OSTRCIL's Calvary Variations are no soft touch - having more
	in common with the Sinfonietta of seven years earlier than with his
	Symphony of the 1900s. There is a shiver and a howl in these pages that is
	quite remarkable for the 1920s and especially for Czech art of that era.
	Intriguing to think that while in England the 1920s signalled the rise of
	music concerned with frivolity and popular culture, works of this grim jaw-set
	were being written in Prague. I am not familiar enough with Ostrcil's music
	to know what he sounded like before the Great War. What brought about this
	change? The notes tell us that he was a committed Christian so clearly this
	work must have had special significance. Was he racked with doubts? At surface
	level there is little here of obvious affirmative value, of exaltation or
	of spiritual uplift. This work seems to take up where the nightmare episodes
	in Suk's Asrael left off. In the Allegro the caco-daemons stoke the
	fires and the bass drum thuds provide us with clear reminders of
	Asrael. This is no obvious lyrical prayer but a far from facile, far
	from predictable dissection of the cry - Eloi, Eloi Sabachtoni'. In
	its own early twentieth century way it is an even bleaker and more courageous
	work than the despair and tender cradling of Allan Pettersson's Seventh Symphony.
	The Ostrcil is a work that impresses through its unwavering consistency and
	valour; not, however, the most loveable of pieces. Ostrcil conducted the
	premiere on 12 March 1929.
	
	Good notes, decent recording quality and generous playing time. Commended
	to the adventurous though the styles of the two works are perhaps unlikely
	to appeal to the same person.
	
	Rob Barnett