Classical Editor: Rob Barnett                               Founder Len Mullenger: Len@musicweb-international.com


Lowell LIEBERMANN
Symphony No. 2, Op.67
Concerto for Flute and Orchestra
Eugenia Zukerman (flute)
Dallas Symphony Chorus
Dallas Symphony Orchestra/Andrew Litton
DELOS DE 3256, Full-Price [60'48]
Crotchet
  AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Although he has just turned 40 Lowell Liebermann has already established a reputation as one of America's most performed and admired young composers. Often attacked by American critics for his backward-looking style, which owes more to the post-Romanticism of Samuel Barber and the later style of Howard Hanson, he is nevertheless admired by audiences and conductors alike. Hearing this magnificent symphony it is easy to understand why for it is a work which recalls in equal measure the opulent textures of early Schoenberg and the Richard Strauss tone poems. There are also the familiar Shostakovichian motifs (timpani, brass and woodwind perorations and repetitions) which made Liebermann's two piano concertos such memorable works. And yet, this is a symphony which more than retains its own identity and 'voice', a work of consummate craftsmanship which more than repays repeated listening.

This is both a choral and an organ symphony (although the obvious comparisons are not contextually relevant). Liebermann's choral setting scales three of the work's four movements and there is no mood of heroism or depth of emotion to make a comparison with Beethoven's Ninth (or even Mahler's Second) a viable one. Listen to the close of the titanic first movement from 8'10 to 9'10 and it is in fact Brahms' German Requiem which most springs to mind as source material for this work. Listen closer to the dark string textures in the first movement and it is again Brahms which emerges from the shadows. Where Beethoven's Ninth had altogether more lofty ambitions, Liebermann's Second Symphony is the paradigm of its intention: a celebratory work written on the crest of a new Millennium.

Written for vast forces (double woodwind, quadruple or triple brass and off-stage brass), as well as a chorus, the orchestra is used in part to respond to the texts by Walt Whitman which the chorus sing. 'All is a procession/the universe is a procession with measured and perfect motion', 'Alternate light and day and the teeming spiritual darkness'. Liebermann's music generates exactly this response - the rhapsodic invocation of a prophetically natural tapestry of martial wit and joyousness which heralds an all-embracing vision totally in keeping with the ecstatic lyricism and poetry of the setting. The most lyrical and reflective music is actually that without chorus - the sublime third movement with its dark basses alluding to a chilling despondency. This introspection is almost shattering - and indeed the two central climaxes to this movement are transfigured from the simplest germs, and yet have a cumulative power which remains unforgettable once heard. When we get to the final movement the exuberance of the mood is reflected by Liebermann returning to Brahms' Requiem (2'05 to 2'30). This finale is masterfully written - the fugato a particular triumph as it builds in volume and intensity towards its climax - the jubilation of the closing pages somehow confirming the atmospheric 'swimming in space' and joyousness of the text.

Written for Andrew Litton and the Dallas Symphony Orchestra for the orchestra's centennial season Liebermann's Second Symphony was first performed in February 2000 (and, according to Litton when I interviewed him, relayed live over the Internet via the Orchestra's website) to considerable public acclaim. This performance recorded before (and during) that premiere is as impassioned as one would expect with playing and singing that is often lifted way above the ordinary by the sheer dedication of all concerned. The recording is extremely transparent and well focused with voices and orchestra caught in a glowing bloom. It is certainly the finest American symphony I have heard since Corigliano's AIDs inspired First.

Lowell Liebermann's Flute Concerto has been recorded three times previously and was commissioned by James Galway and first performed by him in November 1992. An unashamedly 'Romantic' work it seems, to this critic, to lack the sheer brilliance and spikiness of both the First and Second Piano Concertos, virtuosic though the flute part is (notably in the tarantella-like third movement which recalls Prokofiev). Classically proportioned, with single woodwind, the work is deftly structured and certainly one of the few flute concertos written in the last century that can be deemed a 'masterpiece'. Eugenia Zukerman is an impassioned soloist - whether it be in the arcing opening melody, the serenely whispered chants in the second movement or the astonishing prestissimo coda which concludes the work and in which she achieves miracles of breathless precision.

For anyone who has yet to hear Lowell Liebermann's music this disc would make an excellent starting point. Like the earlier disc of piano concertos (available on Hyperion CDA 66966) it is a tour de force and highly recommended. Can we now have a recording of Liebermann's opera, The Picture of Dorian Gray?

Marc Bridle

David Wright is not so impressed:

I had great difficulty reviewing this disc. My copy was faulty. But I knew both works and so this inconvenience did not hinder me greatly.

The Choral symphony is really an anachronism. It is the sort of music that we have heard so many times before. It lacks originality and, curiously, it has an English feel about it as if it were an early work of someone like Hubert Parry. No disrespect to Parry but Liebermann's work is somewhat bland and not very inspiring but I think that this may be partly due to a lousy performance. There is no commitment and, in my experience, Andrew Litton is not a good conductor. He conducted a Prom a few years ago and the only notable thing was when he conducted that awful theme from that trashy TV series Dallas and the horn player hit a gloriously wrong note. His conducting is bland and it does not help a work that seems to be equally bland as well.

Lowell Liebermann is an American composer born in 1961 and has over 70 works to his name so far which may suggest that his production rate is not commensurate with quality. The Second Symphony dates from 1999 and sets words by Walt Whitman. The orchestral forces include an organ and auxiliary brass consigned in balconies. Think of it. Does this really serve a valid purpose?

The selected poems refer to man's relationship within the universe and the music is rhapsodic and somewhat disjointed in character. As a contrast see what the great Vaughan Williams did with Whitman texts in his Sea Symphony and how the music flows in a natural progression. Karl Amadeus Hartmann was also successful with setting this poet but Liebermann's efforts are not convincing.

TIME magazine wrote of this symphony that it was brazen and glittering, now radiantly visionary, a resplendent choral symphony, the work of a composer unafraid of grand gestures and open-hearted lyricism.

Really?

The work is competent but it is not great by any stretch of the imagination. I have heard it many times and have yet to be impressed.

But perhaps I am being unfair. Inherent in all of us is the idea that choral symphonies should be magnificent achievements full of many colours and riveting excitement.

The Flute Concerto fares much better and again while it is not very original or noteworthy it is a good piece and, as far as I can tell, well executed.

I fear that this is a disc that you will have to pass your own verdict upon. For me the symphony was, and remains, a damp squib.

David Wright

Return to Index

Reviews from previous months
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board.  Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.This is the only part of MusicWeb for which you will have to register.


You can purchase CDs, tickets and musician's accessories and Save around 22% with these retailers: