Sergei RACHMANINOV
	Symphonic Dances, op.45,
	Piano Concerto no.2 in c, op.19*
	 Israela Margalit
	(pianoforte)*,
 Israela Margalit
	(pianoforte)*,
	London Symphony Orchestra/Barry Wordsworth
	Recorded Abbey Road Studios, London, undated but pub. 1992
	 BLACK BOX BBM 3001
	[73.33]
 BLACK BOX BBM 3001
	[73.33]
	Crotchet
	£5.99 
	AmazonUK
	  £6.99 AmazonUS
	 Amazon
	recommendations
	
	
	 
	
	
	There are a number of ways of going about the Symphonic Dances. You can be
	brilliantly Russian, with violent explosions of colour and the big tunes
	not too romantic but searingly passionate. Or you can emphasise the doleful,
	death-haunted aspects with broad tempi (I must say I like the first dance
	to be pretty deliberate) and a smouldering, Shostakovich-anticipating tension.
	Either of these ways brings out the relative modernity and forward-looking
	aspects of the score. Another way is to give the orchestra a fairly relaxed
	guide at in-between tempi. This could be a recipe for dullness, or for a
	non-interpretation, but not here when the orchestra is so good and everyone
	sounds so involved. If the conductor does not sock a punch, his guiding hand
	is there, keeping the rhythms from sagging in the lugubrious central waltz
	and timing well the many transitions. What this approach does emphasise is
	the more backward-looking aspects of the score, its Scriabinesque decadentism.
	Which is perfectly reasonable and some may prefer it this way.
	
	I presume the two works were recorded at separate sessions but Israela Margalit's
	bemused manner with the opening solo sounds exactly as if she has just been
	knocked for six by the final gong stroke of the last dance. With the timing
	exactly right it is an inspired moment and I'd dearly like to know if it
	was intended to be so.
	
	In another context I'd have found this opening too pulled around, but the
	performance doesn't continue like that. It is an extremely musical performance.
	Margalit retains a clear, limpid sound in even the most strenuous moments,
	and finds brilliance and tenderness as required. I noticed at times that
	her tone is not always a singing one, but nor is it hard. Co-ordination with
	the orchestra seems a little shaky in the first paragraph but thereafter
	a real partnership emerges (a well-balanced recording, too). Jaded as one
	can get with this concerto I realised at the end that I had listened with
	complete enjoyment and that some moments - the epilogue of the slow movement
	and the close of the whole work which avoids inflation by sheer sincerity
	- had moved me more than they have done for a very long time. I suppose I'll
	never part with Richter in this concerto - especially perhaps the version
	conducted by Kondrashin, where the shared inheritance of Russian gloom on
	the part of pianist, conductor and orchestra reaches unforgettable heights
	in the slow movement - and I wish Edith Farnadi's version with Hermann Scherchen
	(on Westminster) could be reissued; and on balance I'll stay with Ormandy
	for the Dances. But a great deal of pleasure is to be had here.
	
	One last remark. Aren't Black Box supposed to be a rather underground, off-beat
	organisation? Surely this record is dangerously close to popular all-the-family
	listening? (There is an original feature. The notes are the size of
	a postage stamp but if you put the CD in your computer you get access to
	an information-packed website. Except that it was temporarily suspended the
	evening I tried so I can't comment). But might not it have been more in Black
	Box's line to essay a disc of Symphonic Dances, maybe putting the Rachmaninov
	work alongside Ravel's La Valse, Frank Bridge's Dance Poem
	(absolutely the equal of the other two) and Sibelius's Valse Triste
	(arguably not, but you have to sell the disc somehow)? Do your stuff, Black
	Box!
	
	Christopher Howell