BARBIROLLI conducts SIBELIUS' ORCHESTRAL
	  MUSIC
	  JEAN SIBELIUS
	  (1865-1957)
	  
 Hallé Orchestra
	  The HMV mono and Pye Stereo recordings
	  CD1 71.17
	  Symphony No. 2 (1902) [41:23] {45.57}
	  Swan of Tuonela (1893-7) [8.33] {7.51}
	  Symphony No. 7 (1924) [21.16] {21.54}
	  CD2 74.22
	  Symphony No. 1 (1898-9) [40.44] {41.50}
	  Symphony No. 5 (1914-19) [33:34] {33.15}
	  CD1 All recorded in mono by EMI 1949-55
	  CD2 All recorded in stereo by Pye
	  1957
	  ADD
	  
 DUTTON LABORATORIES The
	  Barbirolli Society CDSJB 1018
	  
	  
	  Crotchet
	   
	  
	  
	  
	  
	  HMV's 5CD stereo collection of the complete Barbirolli Sibelius symphonies
	  made a splash earlier this year. It is phenomenally well transferred with
	  sound of a rich ferocity. The downside was that they caught Barbirolli in
	  old age and illness. Some interpretations have that tawny fire, notably Symphony
	  No. 1. However a certain 'accidie' invades symphonies 2, 3, 5 and 7. The
	  HMV set was Barbirolli's only complete cycle but in the 1950s he recorded
	  a number of single symphonies which are most valuably collected here. I have
	  reproduced the timings of the EMI 1960s comparators in curled brackets and
	  the Dutton set in squared brackets.
	  
	  The Dutton Second Symphony has nothing of Oblomov about it. It is flammably
	  impetuous though still not the equal of the overwhelming and stunningly recorded
	  Chesky RPO version from 1962. The impetuosity can be heard in the string
	  surges at 1.48 in the first movement and the rush at 6.59 in the third movement.
	  The mono sound tends to 'clog' marginally at volume but the excitement and
	  vigour is patent and smartly catches you up in the drama no matter how well
	  you may know the music. The Second Symphony, mono and all, is a welcome antidote
	  to the torpor of the HMV 1960s stereo version.
	  
	  Defying generalisation The Swan of Tuonela is slower in the Dutton
	  version than the 1960s HMV the richness of which makes the HMV set preferable
	  in this respect. Despite Roger Winfield's cor anglais neither version matches
	  the tension and slow concentration of magic in the 1960s Mravinsky on
	  BMG-Melodiya. Speaking of Mravinsky we come to the Seventh Symphony which,
	  in Barbirolli's hands, tends towards a steadier somnolent pace and an unwavering
	  inward quality. Nothing is rapped out. Contours are evened and smoothed.
	  The recording conspires in the same calming direction with the interpretation
	  becoming more incisive from 10.00 onwards. The voltage setting remains lower
	  but is preferable to the somnifacient HMV 1960s version. The Seventh is the
	  only work here to have been recorded at Abbey Road. The rest are taken from
	  the Hallé's own stamping ground, the Free Trade Hall, Manchester.
	  The set reproduces the original LP cover for the Seventh which intriguingly
	  was coupled with Rubbra 5.
	  
	  My memories of the Pye two-channel recordings are based on the Golden Guinea
	  bargain reissue LPs of the 1960s and early 1970s. Accordingly I was astonished
	  by the clarity and attack evident in the second Dutton disc. The Golden Guinea
	  LPs sounded truly sub fusc; not so now. Cliff edge drama (listen to
	  the gruff and barbed brass at 11.01 in the first movement) and a rock-steady
	  control are notable in Dutton's mastering. Among all the flowing fire Barbirolli
	  is alive to the snow-fields' pastoral limpidity. The First must have been
	  a special favourite of Barbirolli's. It is also the most successful of the
	  symphonies in the HMV box. At 7.40 in the andante I have never heard the
	  fast rising and falling string waves given such exciting prominence. This
	  is a very special heart-racing performance in plangent 1957 sound (Ah those
	  quasi-Mahlerian strings at 9:40!) - a tribute to engineer Bob Auger as is
	  the Fifth Symphony.
	  
	  The Fifth is also a Pye recording. The sound is prone to a subtle level of
	  'shatter' at high volume and impact. This is noticeable in the offbeat
	  hammer-blows that close the symphony. This is a very fine performance in
	  which everyone is on their toes not least in the ppp shadow world
	  of the skittering finale at 4.32 where the 1957 sound quality is stunning.
	  The chivalric writing emphasises for me the connection backwards to the
	  Lemminkainen Legends especially the Saari Adventures and the
	  Return. Would that Barbirolli had recorded the complete Legends.
	  
	  Michael Kennedy's notes are always worth reading showing care to match the
	  text to the discs and particular performances. One correction: Barbirolli
	  did record the Sibelius Violin Concerto with Heifetz. The two discs are neatly
	  packaged in a single width case.
	  
	  Reviewer
	  
	  Rob Barnett 
	  
	  
	  
	  and Gerald Fenech adds:
	  
	  This interesting package (like the Elgar before it) brings together Glorious
	  John's earlier and thus rather rare recordings of the Sibelius symphonies
	  closer to his heart. I always had some qualms and trepidations about his
	  later Sixties Halle' recordings, fine as these are, one cannot fail to notice
	  some excessive mannerisms here and there that detract from such superbly
	  structured pieces as the Fifth and Seventh. On the contrary these magnificently
	  refurbished Pye recordings demonstrate a grand sweep and manner that was
	  characteristic of Sir John's live performances so often talked about in
	  Manchester of the fifties. I was particularly taken by the emotional undercurrent
	  that runs through the Finale of the Fift, here barbirolli rivals the best
	  for grandeur and nobility. He is also cogently articulated in the Seventh
	  which reminded me of Beecham's classic 1940 NYPO reading and a subsequent
	  excellent version by Lorin Maazel on Decca (1967/VPO). The first two symphonies
	  were recorded almost five years apart but the Second is a very fine recording
	  indeed, quite matching his earlier NYPO version (also available on Dutton)
	  which realy has 'white heat' written all over it. In any case this 1952 Abbey
	  Road version is quite preferable to the last recording which has some squeaky
	  gesticulations and alterations in the Finale, which are not to my taste.
	  The same could go for this slickly played version of the First which has
	  a deep sense of hidden power that also places it amongst the best First's
	  that I have ever heard. Altogether, and with a haunting 'swan' as a bonus,
	  this release should now serve to be the 'Barbirolli Sibelius Album' complementing
	  the more famous (but not necessarily better) EMI set perfectly.
	  
	  Gerald Fenech
	  
	  Performance: 
	  
	  
	  Sound: 
	  ***/****