Sonata in B flat, op. 5,1 (Warb A1) [6:01]
Sonata in D, op. 5,2 (Warb A2) [12:35]
Sonata in G, op. 5,3 (Warb A3) [7:53]
Sonata in E flat, op. 5,4 (Warb A4) [8:26]
Sonata in E, op. 5,5 (Warb A5) [9:59]
Sonata in c minor, op. 5,6 (Warb A6) [11:05]
rec. no details supplied
Johann Christian Bach, the youngest son of Johann Sebastian,
is in various ways an atypical Bach. He was the only one who had a vivid
interest in composing operas, which was one of the reasons he moved to Italy.
There he converted to the Roman Catholic Church and took a position as organist
in Milan. He then moved to London which was one of the main cultural centres
in Europe at the time. Stylistically he probably moved further away from
his father than any of his brothers. In modern times he is clearly overshadowed
by Carl Philipp Emanuel and Wilhelm Friedemann whose works are is much more
frequently performed than his. Johann Christian is one of the main representatives
of the
galant idiom and for many years that militated against performance.
This style was considered rather superficial:
galant music went
in one ear and out the other and made no lasting impression. Slowly that
view was reconsidered and that had everything to do with the rise of the
use of period instruments.
The sonatas op. 5 are a landmark in music history especially because they
had a strong influence on Mozart. On his concert tour across Europe, together
with his father Leopold and sister Nannerl, he stayed for some time in London
and met Johann Christian. The result was a strong and lasting friendship.
Until the end of Bach's life Mozart held him in high esteem. When
Bach died Mozart wrote to his father: "What a loss for the world of
music!". He arranged three of the sonatas from op. 5, the numbers 2
to 4, as concertos for keyboard, two violins and bass. This is the main
reason why this set became Bach's best-known music well before the
rest of his oeuvre was taken seriously.
Printed editions with keyboard music were mostly aimed at the fast-growing
market of amateurs. That was especially the case in England where domestic
music-making at the homes of the bourgeoisie was booming at the time Bach
lived in London. He certainly had this kind of player in mind when he composed
his sonatas. This was also observed by the music historian Charles Burney,
who wrote: "In general, his compositions for the pianoforte are such
as ladies can execute with little trouble; and the allegros rather resemble
bravura songs than instrumental pieces for the display of great executions".
Mention of the pianoforte suggests that Bach's sonatas were conceived
for this instrument which was rather new at the time they were published
(1766). However, we should not jump to any conclusions from this statement
which doesn't specifically refer to the op. 5 set. At that time various
instruments coexisted: the harpsichord, the fortepiano and probably also
the spinet. For that reason it is impossible to say that a specific instrument
is the best medium for these sonatas.
The first of the set includes dynamic markings which reflect the fashion
of the time. It suggests the fortepiano, but could also be performed at
the harpsichord. From around the middle of the century harpsichords with
devices such as machine stops and Venetian swell were built in an attempt
to save the harpsichord from being pushed off the music scene. The
Sonata
No. 5 opens with an
allegro assai which is "all noise
and technical fireworks", as Sylvia Berry writes in the booklet to
the present disc. She continues: "One way composers achieved dynamics
at the harpsichord was by simple addition and subtraction: the more notes
there are, the louder it is, and vice versa. The first and last movements
feature typical 'noise-making' devices in the left hand that
were used by many harpsichord composers to create more volume and a fuller
texture (...)." The sixth sonata begins with a
grave which
then turns
attacca into a
fugue, and this could again
suggest the use of the harpsichord. On the other hand, the opening movement
of the second sonata, which Berry connects with military music, partly because
of the key of D major, comes off particularly well on the fortepiano.
One specific form of fortepiano was the square or table piano which was
very popular in England at the time and was produced in large numbers, also
because it was relatively cheap. It would have been an interesting option
to perform these sonatas on such an instrument. In her liner-notes Berry
mentions this option, and adds that this was an instrument for domestic
music-making; not for public performances. She states that it is hard to
imagine Bach performing exclusively on them when good grand pianos were
available. That may be plausible, but the use of the kind of piano Bart
van Oort plays here is not very plausible at all. I find it hard to understand
why someone as knowledgeable as Van Oort decided to use a copy of a fortepiano
by Anton Walter from around 1795. That is not the kind of instrument which
was known in England at the time. An opportunity has been missed to perform
these sonatas on instruments which were in vogue in Johann Christian's
time, be it a harpsichord with dynamic devices or a square piano or even
an English grand piano from the 1760s or 1770s.
That is especially regrettable as the performances are excellent. Van Oort
is a seasoned interpreter of classical and romantic repertoire on fortepianos,
and he takes Johann Christian Bach's music fully seriously. He pays
much attention to the different features of the respective sonatas, and
his interpretation does justice to the stylistic differences within this
set. This is a very fine recording on the fortepiano, and a good alternative
to Sophie Yates' performances on the harpsichord (
Chandos
CHAN0762). However, there is still room for a recording which comes
closer to the circumstances under which these sonatas were originally performed.
Johan van Veen
http://www.musica-dei-donum.org
https://twitter.com/johanvanveen