Karel Ančerl (1908-1973) 
        was a very fine conductor but I’m not sure he has always received 
        due acknowledgement. One reason for this may well be the intermittent 
        availability of Supraphon recordings in the West. As this CD shows, his 
        partnership with the Czech Philharmonic, of which he was successively 
        Principal or Chief Conductor between 1950 and 1968, was a formidable one. 
        This generously filled programme comprises music by Martinů 
        in recordings made in the heyday of that partnership. 
         
        
Ančerl directs a 
          finely detailed and grave account of Memorial to Lidice 
          (1943), Martinů's eloquent elegy to the victims of a Nazi atrocity 
          in the town of Lidice. It is one of the composer’s finest utterances 
          and here receives a performance which is wholly worthy of it. 
        
 
        
The Frescos (1956) 
          is one of Martinů's most winning scores. The music is of considerable 
          richness and invention, teeming with detail and skilfully orchestrated. 
          The luminous sonorities are extremely well realised in this performance. 
          Ančerl displays both a keen ear for the constantly shifting textures 
          and an acute sense of rhythm. This is a marvellous account of this vibrant, 
          colourful score and it is played with great intensity by the 
          CPO. (How refreshing it is to hear once again the distinctive tang of 
          their woodwind and the even more characteristic vibrant tone of the 
          east European brass players: it suits this music so well.) The second 
          part of the triptych, depicting the Dream of Constantine, is, I think, 
          particularly fine with some wonderfully eloquent playing from the richly 
          toned, well-nourished string section. 
        
 
        
The Parables (1958-9) is a very late work. The 
          eponymous parables are not of the biblical variety. The first two, ‘Parable 
          of a sculptor’ and ‘Parable of a garden’ are inspired by passages from 
          The Citadel by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. The third, ‘Parable 
          of a Labyrinth’ takes for its inspiration words from the play Theseus’ 
          Voyage by Georges Neveux (all the relevant texts are printed in 
          the booklet). 
        
 
        
By the time he wrote this 
          work Martinů was mortally ill and much of the music seems to me 
          to be imbued with a sense of valedictory ecstasy. To be truthful, the 
          words which fired Martinů's imagination are somewhat allusive and, 
          particularly when one reads them shorn of their literary context, it’s 
          far from easy to grasp the meaning behind them, still less to relate 
          them to the music. However, Martinů’s pieces can be enjoyed on 
          their own merits, I think, and they seem to me to be 
          performed here with authority and conviction. The CzPO was a very fine 
          band at this period and they serve Martinů well. 
        
 
        
The most substantial single 
          work on the disc is the Fifth Symphony (1946). As it happens, a much 
          later, live performance by Ančerl has just been released in the 
          excellent volume of EMI’s Great Conductors of the Twentieth Century 
          series (a mandatory purchase for Ančerl's admirers). This later 
          performance was given in 1971 with the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, whose 
          Chief Conductor Ančerl was 
          from 1968 until his death. The Czech account is much more expansive 
          than the Toronto reading; in Toronto Ančerl took just over 27 minutes. 
        
 
        
This CzPO performance was, I suspect, the first recording 
          of the work. Perhaps that accounts for the extra degree of electricity. 
          Certainly, as compared with the Toronto recording I find much more tension 
          in the slow introduction to the first movement and there seems to be 
          more of a sense of release and joy when the main allegro arrives (track 
          1, 1’54"). Thereafter, in the Czech performance there is an abundance 
          of athleticism and freshness, not quite matched in Toronto, as the movement 
          unfolds. 
        
 
        
The second movement, which seems almost to begin in 
          mid-sentence, is marked Larghetto. The Czech performance is marginally 
          slower and more closely equates to what I understand by that marking. 
          The important flute solo, for instance (track 2, 0’59") is not 
          appreciably slower than in Toronto but the player just seems to have 
          that little bit extra time for the long phrases (that, of course, may 
          well be as much due to the skill of the Czech flautist as it is to Ančerl's 
          pacing.) Ančerl builds the movement purposefully to its strong 
          but lyrical central climax (track 2., 4’12”). This is followed by a 
          passage dominated by a solo trumpet (4’38” to 5’31”) which might almost 
          have been written by Copland – the symphony was written 
          in America – and I love the silvery, open tone of the Czech trumpeter, 
          which seems to convey an impression of nostalgia and of the open-air 
          to perfection. 
        
 
        
It is in the finale where 
          I think this earlier reading is most to be preferred to Ančerl’s 
          later account. The largo introduction is well played by the Toronto 
          musicians but the CzPO, at a broader tempo, not only dig into the notes 
          more, they also dig behind them. The result is a taut, searching 
          passage of great intensity. Timings don’t always tell the full story 
          but I think it’s significant that in 1971 Ančerl 
          took 2’54” for this section whereas in 1955 he stretched the music to 
          3’57” and, to my ears, attained greater depth as a result. In the main 
          allegro, too, there seems just a fraction more space around 
          the notes and a heightened sense of exaltation in the Czech performance. 
        
 
        
I think there are two other factors which weigh in 
          favour of this Czech recording over the Toronto account. Firstly the 
          sound, though it has some limitations – not serious, in my view – and 
          is more resonant is actually more open and pleasant to listen to, I 
          find. Secondly, though the Toronto orchestra plays well enough the CzPO, 
          admittedly recorded under studio conditions, are in a different class. 
          This, I think, is definitely the Ančerl 
          version of this symphony to have. 
        
 
        
This, then, is a first 
          rate anthology of Martinů orchestral works. All the performances 
          are top class. It seems to me that these Czech musicians had a fervour 
          to communicate the music of their native land in the same way that characterised, 
          say, the 1950s Danish recordings of Nielsen’s symphonies. Ančerl’s 
          interpretations strike me as being completely natural and authoritative. 
          The sound is perfectly adequate and the notes are serviceable though 
          the English translations are a trifle clumsy. 
        
 
        
        Admirers of Martinů’s music are strongly advised 
          to snap up this CD while it remains available. I highly recommend this 
          release. 
        
        
 
        
 John Quinn