> TCHAIKOVSKY Piano Concerto 1 [GPJ]: Classical Reviews- May2002 MusicWeb(UK)

One of the most grown-up review sites around

54,416 reviews
and more.. and still writing ...

Search MusicWeb Here



International mailing

Founder: Len Mullenger                                    Editor in Chief:John Quinn             

Pyotr Ilyich TCHAIKOVSKY (1840 – 1893)
Piano Concerto no. 1 in B flat minor
1812 Overture

Arkady Sevidov, piano
Russian Philharmonic Orchestra/Samuel Friedmann
Concerto recorded October 1996, Overture recorded July 1996, Russian Broadcast and Recording Department, Studio 5, Moscow
ARTE NOVA CLASSICS 74321 43327 [50:06] Superbudget


  AmazonUK   AmazonUS

Two Tchaikovsky ‘block-busters’, given here, I regret to say, in unremarkable performances. Sevidov is a dependable soloist in the concerto, but has little special insight or imagination to bring to this war-horse. There are many fine versions, and there is certainly nothing here to come close to Argerich’s magnificent DG account. Sevidov, as I say, does a good job, and all the notes are definitely there, which is saying something. It is the orchestral accompaniment that reduces this to a distinctly pedestrian interpretation; Friedmann has a stolid, ‘kappelmeister’ approach to the music, which sometimes had me almost screaming in frustration, for he often resolutely refuses to let the music move forward urgently when it must do so. The orchestra tries hard, and there is some genuinely expressive playing, in particular from principal woodwind soloists. But the general impression is turgid, unyielding.

The same problems mar the 1812 Overture, surely a piece for which performers have to adopt a ‘no-holds-barred’ attitude. This isn’t great music, as Tchaikovsky himself readily admitted (though of course he wasn’t the most reliable witness where his own music was concerned, as is the case with many composers), and it needs a firm hand if it is to succeed. There are balance problems in the ‘cellos at the start (lower players overbalancing the melody line), and other details are not sufficiently vividly projected to make the piece come alive. The booklet notes, brief as they are, are amusingly misleading, suggesting that the 1812 Overture is a somewhat unfamiliar piece! This is sloppy production, caused by an unedited translation of the original Russian notes by Irene Brandenburg; it’s not hard to believe that 1812 is unfamiliar in Russia, but in the west that is certainly not the case.

At the climax of the piece, the notoriously repetitive descending scales are allowed to slow down grotesquely, so that they seem even more absurd than usual, and the ending seems strangely muted; plenty of bells, but no cannons that I could hear, just a few half-hearted bangs from off-stage.

If you are desperate for this particular coupling, you might try this to see whether you can live with the performances – otherwise my advice would be ‘steer clear’!

Gwyn Parry-Jones


Return to Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.