Neville Cardus memorably described Mahler's Fifth Symphony as 'one 
          of the seven wonders of the musical world'. From this it can be taken 
          that any performance by a good quality orchestra and conductor will 
          reveal insights into this miraculous score. And so it proves here, even 
          if the Cologne orchestra does not immediately suggest the Mahlerian 
          pedigree of the Vienna Philharmonic, the New York Philharmonic or the 
          Concertgebouw.
        In fact it was this Cologne orchestra who gave the first performance 
          of Mahler 5, so their recording from 1994 takes on a special meaning. 
          Not that the present generation of musicians has much, if anything, 
          to do with those players who appeared under Mahler's baton. But at least 
          it is a nice touch, the more so since the orchestra has maintained its 
          proud traditions in the intervening period of a century or so.
        James Conlon has built a distinguished record as a conductor, both 
          in live performances and through recordings, and his Mahler displays 
          a sure control and a deft touch. His tempi are direct, generating a 
          symphonic impulse which is full of momentum. The work is cast in three 
          parts, with the first pair and the last pair of movements thematically 
          and expressively linked. At the heart of the Symphony lies what Mahler 
          described as 'the very devil of a scherzo'. This large-scale movement, 
          some twenty minutes in dureation, is in fact the jewel in the crown 
          of Conlon's performance. 
        Following the composer's advice, the tempo here is steady rather than 
          fast, so that the rhythms achieve due impact in building the music's 
          strength. From this basic pulse the contrasting waltz material achieves 
          a natural sense of growth and flow, beautifully balanced in the perspective 
          of the recording. This procedure, allied with the nature of the recorded 
          sound, generally tends to suit the more intimate aspects of the music 
          better than the richly textured or the virtuoso aspects of the score. 
          For example, the starring role of the trumpet makes less impression 
          than it might. This is apparent from the very first bar, when there 
          is a decided reticence about the instrument's recorded balance, though 
          the playing seems assured enough.
        For there is room for more richness in the sound spectrum than EMI 
          provides. In particular the strings lack bloom, and it is difficult 
          to tell whether the fault lies in the recording or the playing. The 
          famous Adagietto for strings and harp provides the obvious focus for 
          consideration, and whatever the tenderness and compassion in the phrasing 
          and tempo, the sound itself can make more impression that it does in 
          this recording. Rather better is the finale, whose momentum and contrapuntal 
          ingenuity drive the music along. Here and elsewhere the percussion make 
          their point, and in many respects the timpanist steals the show. But 
          in general terms there is decided lack of heart, although boosting the 
          volume does help.
        This is a powerful and a complex work, one which demands high standards 
          from all involved, including the attentiveness of the audience. Mahler 
          knew of the music's complexities, saying 'would that the first performance 
          could be given fifty years after my death'. And in a sense he was right, 
          since it was only during the 1960s with the popularity of the long-playing 
          record that the 'Mahler boom' really began. 
        As ever with this composer, the symphony proves to be a journey traversing 
          the struggles of doubt and belief, through this world and toward the 
          mystery which is the next. As such the music needs to command the indulgence 
          and commitment of the listener, as moreover it does the technique and 
          artistry of the players. Despite many fine things, this performance 
          cannot rate with the best, with for example Barbirolli (EMI), Bernstein 
          (DG) or Inbal (Denon). What is more, the accompanying booklet is frankly 
          inadequate, with notes which are all too brief and generalised, along 
          with a preference for design over content.
        While this performance undoubtedly has its merits, in the final analysis 
          neither the music making, the recorded sound nor the general presentation 
          ranks among the highest standards to be found in this repertoire. 
        Terry Barfoot