Backhaus recorded the "32" twice. His mono 
          set was superseded but not necessarily surpassed by the stereo remakes 
          from which come these five sonatas – with the exception of the Appassionata 
          which was common to both sets as Backhaus died before he could re-record 
          it. The given date of 1959 in this Eloquence Decca release must relate 
          to the reprocessed-in-stereo version of that year. 
        
 
        
It was fashionable for many years to judge Backhaus 
          in the scale and find him wanting. His prodigious early recordings were 
          just too fluent, his Beethovenian credentials too coarse and his rhythmic 
          licence too extreme. Beside the venerated Schnabel he seemed unintellectual, 
          next to Kempff unpoetic; even comparison to an earlier generation of 
          leading Beethovenians seemed to work against him – he had, for example, 
          little of Lamond’s artful insight. But the five sonatas here enshrined 
          go some way to confirming that Backhaus’s gruff plainness was as distinguishing 
          a feature of his playing as the supposedly more elevated characteristics 
          of Schnabel were a defining part of his. 
        
 
        
In the Tempest he is more unvarnished than elemental; 
          there is a directness to his phrasing that is distinctly attractive 
          but also times in the slow movement when a rather inexpressive and slightly 
          monotonous feeling can descend. One can also feel a slight metrical 
          lethargy to his playing here though it is maybe as well to consider 
          it as of a piece with his conception of the sonata as a whole. Certainly 
          he is quite unlike the more flamboyant and skittish Schnabel in the 
          finale – instead he is solid, patrician with some notably fine playing. 
          The Appassionata reveals his deep seriousness of purpose and 
          the fixity of his conception. There are times when his rubato does seem 
          excessive but never arbitrary. He observes the con moto marking 
          of the andante – with, again, some superficially unevenly applied 
          rubato. But there is also some excellent – ‘exquisite’ is not really 
          a word one can ascribe to Backhaus – left hand staccato. If the movement 
          emerges as a little "straight" it is still powerfully alive. 
          He attacks the Appassionata’s finale with rough accents, occasionally 
          some overused pedal, but he brings out individual lines with accelerandos 
          and big powerful chording. Altogether this is a systematically rugged 
          and visceral performance. 
        
 
        
In the two little Opp 78 and 79 sonatas we can again 
          appreciate the chordal depth he can sink (especially in the opening 
          movement of A Therese) – if a little unrelieved in its insistence. 
          And also the straight-faced humour of the Presto alla tedesca of 
          Sonata No 25 with its affecting and charmingly understated slow movement 
          and the sheer rightness and aplomb of the vivace. In Les Adieux, 
          the sonata of gentle regret, he is equally successful at conveying 
          pensiveness and energy, wistfulness and release. 
        
 
        
Backhaus’s are not the most subtle and hair-triggered 
          of responses; he is not a dazzling colourist or a transcendental technician. 
          But there is great nobility and pianistic honesty in his playing and 
          these are qualities that belong only to the rarest of musicians. 
        
 
        
        
Jonathan Woolf 
        
         
        
 
        
        
AVAILABILITY 
        
www.buywell.com