"It was as if the great old man was trying to shake 
          the gates of eternity from their hinges," wrote a member of the audience 
          in Stuttgart on April 5th 1970 to the Intendant of the Berlin Philharmonic 
          after hearing Barbirolli conduct Mahler's Second Symphony there. By 
          then "the great old man" had just weeks to live and in the last months 
          of his life he had been much concerned with this particular work, so 
          perhaps the letter writer was closer to the truth than he knew. Sir 
          John had conducted the Second in Manchester in November 1969, then again 
          in Stuttgart five months later. It is one of my greatest regrets that 
          I had the chance to go to that Manchester performance but didn't take 
          it. As a 15-year-old taking his first steps in classical music I chose 
          instead to see Sir John conduct Rossini, Debussy and Elgar a week before. 
          Fortunately the Stuttgart performance was taped for broadcasting and 
          an unofficial "aircheck" has been available for some years on the Arkadia 
          label. Sound-wise this had considerable limitations and was hard to 
          find. However it was always known that Stuttgart Radio had retained 
          the master tape and many of us who admired the performance hoped one 
          day it would get an official release. That day has now come with the 
          recording forming the centrepiece of this set in EMI's "Great Conductors 
          of the 20th Century" series. This is a production by IMG Artists who 
          have, through their association with BBC Legends, already brought us 
          another great Mahler recording from the same period of Barbirolli's 
          life: his Hallé Orchestra version of the Third Symphony made 
          for the BBC (BBC Legends BBCL 4004-7) also 
          reviewed here. 
        
 
        
Barbirolli knew Mahler's Second intimately. Lyndon 
          Jenkins's notes tell us he had performed it thirty-two times in twelve 
          years by the time he came to step on to the podium in Stuttgart. In 
          the first movement the feeling - the tone of voice - is of the world-weary 
          which when you consider Sir John was by then quite ill is not surprising. 
          Note the lamenting, singing line that appears to run through to run 
          through every page. It is broadly sung and yet expectant too with some 
          expressive string playing and excellent woodwinds full of character. 
          Hear also how the tension builds through the first development, assisted 
          greatly by Barbirolli's feel for the particular sound of this movement. 
          He is almost Klemperer-like as he exposes the bones beneath the skin, 
          the muscularity within the lyricism. The crisis at the recapitulation 
          is dramatic though a crucial moment of uncertainty in the ensemble should 
          be noted here which, I think, adds to the sense of drama in this "live" 
          experience even though it will be irritating on repeated listening for 
          some. I'm afraid this is something you either have to be prepared to 
          accept in archive recordings like this or steer clear of them. But I 
          think you would be the poorer if you did. The Klemperer-like urgency 
          continues through the recapitulation so that the slowing down at the 
          return of the great ascending theme doesn't need to be too broad to 
          make an effect. Sir John is ever the master of tempo relationships, 
          carried forward to the coda that has a great sense of menace as the 
          music makes its approach and then a slight quickening to the climax. 
          I also admire the way Barbirolli seems to leave the movement hanging 
          on a question. More so than any other conductor and a unique touch. 
          All in all this is a reading in the grand tradition that still seems 
          to unite both the urgency of Klemperer and the lyricism of a Walter.
        
 The second movement then gets a largely straightforward 
          performance compared with the first but one still full of rhythmic point 
          that makes it rather special. I also feel that Barbirolli notices kinship 
          between this music and the Altvaterisch passages in the Scherzo of the 
          Sixth Symphony and that is a nice touch. Note also the singing cellos 
          in the latter part of the first episode: a real Barbirolli fingerprint 
          there. Then in the central section there is the superb balancing of 
          parts - woodwind and brass against strings are particularly good. In 
          spite of what some people may think, Barbirolli was a man whose Mahler 
          could move along but I do wonder if this is how it would have been had 
          he recorded it in the studio? Evidence of comparing off-air recordings 
          of "live" performances with studio versions shows a tighter approach 
          in the concert hall to tempo. 
        
 
        
It really takes a master conductor of Mahler to recognise 
          and bring out the ironies and sarcasm in the third movement and Barbirolli 
          is certainly in that category on this evidence alone. He does it by 
          seeming to have grasped that this is firstly very weird and unhinged 
          music indeed. Mahler after all wrote of seeing the world in a concave 
          mirror. Those prominent wind lines I mentioned earlier are used again 
          to full effect to convey all of this. The constant hinting of an uneasy 
          lyricism at the heart of this movement shows Barbirolli recognises that 
          this is very uncomfortable music indeed. I also like the col legno 
          snaps from the strings as well as they suggest the sharp edges of the 
          movement so well. The central section strives and exhilarates but the 
          trumpet solo at the heart is delivered like no other performance I know, 
          not even Klemperer's, so full is it of aching nostalgia among the kaleidoscope. 
          Exactly as it should be. Why can't other conductors get their trumpeters 
          to play it like this? Are the players too afraid of sounding cheap? 
          Note again the lovely pointing of the woodwind, perky and cheeky and 
          then the rush to the cry of disgust where a sharp and grand quality 
          then enters the music delivering weight and true power. 
        
 
        
In the fourth movement Birgit Finnilä is suitably 
          dark in "Urlicht" but notice the deliberate pointing of the brass against 
          her opening line and then the final flourish on the strings as the movement 
          closes. This is a unique touch of JB in the night, I think. A bit naughty, 
          of course, but I would be happy to enter his plea in mitigation after 
          a visit from the score police. All in all this is a very Mahlerian reading 
          of the movement. By that I mean that it's full of delicious "Wunderhorn" 
          characteristics - note the plangent brass and the melodic line stressed. 
          Not the rather pious, prissy hymn we too often hear. The fifth movement 
          then bursts in with fine abandon and notice the prominence given to 
          the fine woodwind players again as the music settles down. After the 
          off-stage "voice in wilderness" the approach by Barbirolli as the ascent 
          begins is remarkably direct, no hamming, no mannerism. The Music is 
          allowed to speak for itself but with some fine highlighting of solo 
          instruments to vary the texture and keep the ear always interested. 
          Barbirolli recognises the drama within the music superbly and that it 
          must be varied. There is even a lilt in the way the music gathers strength 
          and still he doesn't linger as some conductors do seeming to have a 
          much tougher conception, and so it will prove as time goes on. The first 
          appearance of the "O Glaube" motive becomes superbly restless, 
          a small cauldron bubbling away and then the solemn brass with very fruity 
          vibrato leads to a fine climax which caps the episode with drama and 
          colour. The great march is again Klemperer-like, this time in its sheer 
          guts and trenchancy. It is also very colourful and not a little manic. 
          There are some fluffs from the brass in the cut and thrust of this "live" 
          performance, but what do you expect? Anyway these only add to the experience 
          of struggle and travail. You can hear everything clearly also because, 
          like all the great Mahler conductors, Barbirolli knew to make every 
          note count, especially in the crises that engulf at the march's end. 
          These are remarkable for their clarity, as also is the interlude with 
          the off-stage brass band that contains a truly snarling trombone solo 
          and great swagger from the band. One of the best realisations of this 
          crucial moment I have ever heard. When the chorus enters there is real 
          serenity. Not the serenity of a plaster saint but of a man, one who 
          has seen life, sinned and repented before a hard-won deliverance that 
          rises at the end to triumphant, dramatic paen. 
        
 
        
If you know Barbirolli's studio recordings of Mahler 
          this may not be the kind of performance you would expect. It's a fascinating 
          reading full of insight, drama and a sense of danger. Both from the 
          fact that it's "live" and also from Sir John's own philosophy of Mahler 
          in performance with the score as almost a living entity that should 
          come off the page. Rather like his performance of Bruckner's 
          Eighth Symphony from six weeks later in London (BBC Legends BBCL 
          4067-2) he also seems to expose the nerve ends of the music and rage 
          against the creeping shadow of his own mortality to a degree that is, 
          in hindsight, deeply moving. Shaking the gates of eternity, as that 
          member of audience in Stuttgart so perceptively noted. Such a distinctive 
          reading demands consideration both in itself and as evidence of one 
          of the great Mahlerians caught "on the wing" and in the final weeks 
          of his life. It is flawed in execution, though. As I have said, there 
          are a few fluffs in the ensemble, most times in places that you wouldn't 
          expect any problems to occur, and you must be aware of these. Apart 
          from the passage in the first movement recapitulation already mentioned 
          the worst moment is probably when the trumpet section misses its climactic 
          entry in the coda of the last movement and comes in a bar or two late. 
          Nothing can be done about this and to throw out this recording on the 
          back of explainable and excusable lapses such as this would be perverse 
          in the extreme. I also believe that, in spite of all that, this is a 
          performance touched with genius. Not a recording for the everyday, certainly. 
          One to take down every so often with the virtues surely outweighing 
          the vices overwhelmingly, I believe so. 
        
 
        
The rest of the set is a very good representation of 
          Barbirolli's art. No Vaughan Williams, which is a pity, but there may 
          have been commercial considerations to take into account. Many people 
          will already have Sir John's RVW in their collections and the presence 
          of the Mahler indicates a desire to issue recordings in this series 
          that may be unfamiliar. I think this might have had something to do 
          with the presence of the Mastersingers Prelude. This was recorded in 
          time left over at the EMI sessions for Strauss's Ein Heldenleben in 
          1969 with the London Symphony Orchestra to coincide with a concert performance. 
          It was not issued at the time and only came out in EMI's memorial tribute 
          to Sir John in 1970 so many people will not have this. If you know the 
          Heldenleben recording you will know it presents from some expansive 
          tempi that are sometimes to the work's detriment and the same is true 
          of this Mastersingers Prelude. The LSO does play magnificently. The 
          horns are especially ripe and the strings too sustain Barbirolli's huge 
          line superbly. The cellos dig so deep into the notes it's surprising 
          they didn't hit the water table. The woodwinds deliver the Apprentices 
          rubicund and chubby but they are rather old Apprentices in this evidence. 
          In the end there is not really enough lift and bounce to this joyous 
          music to make me want to hear this performance too often but the sheer 
          honesty and love of the music by this conductor shines through and the 
          vintage recorded sound has come up beautifully. 
        
 
        
The Ravel and Elgar items are a different matter as 
          both these recordings come from earlier in Barbirolli's career and the 
          golden years with the Hallé Orchestra in the middle and late 
          1950s when he was recording for the Pye label often with the Mercury 
          recording team in attendance. Again they have been more out of the catalogue 
          than in since release so it is good to see them here. Ravel's Mother 
          Goose has freshness and precision that speaks volumes for the standards 
          of playing the Hallé had achieved by 1957. Barbirolli was also 
          half-French and always had an affinity for French music. Here he marries 
          a sharp ear for detail with a lovely sense of lyricism and melody. The 
          sound recording also belies its years and is a charming interlude before 
          the Elgar. 
        
 
        
I have always preferred Barbirolli’s 1956 Pye version 
          of the Enigma Variations with the Hallé Orchestra to his remake 
          with the Philharmonia for EMI ten years later. It was out of the catalogue 
          many years and its only CD appearance was so short many will not have 
          it. For one thing there is a real sense of being present at a "live" 
          performance even though this is a studio recording made in the empty 
          Free Trade Hall. This means the individual variations seem to unfold 
          more naturally, each growing out of its predecessor seamlessly to make 
          a really satisfying whole. R.P.A. (V) is a slightly freer spirit than 
          he is ten years later, I think, and there is a more rhapsodic feel in 
          the slightly quicker tempi for the other, more sweeping melodies. They 
          are helped too by the slightly fuller acoustic. This can be heard to 
          good effect in W.M.B (IV) and "Troyte" (VII) where every section of 
          the strings making their runs are audible, cellos especially digging 
          in. However it must be said that in both recordings Barbirolli's reading 
          of this work is filled with imagination and affection. Winifred Norbury 
          (VIII) comes over as real prelude to Nimrod (IX) which is as noble and 
          as moving a song of friendship that you could wish for. Played as it 
          is here, shorn of mawkish memorial tone, it’s an object lesson in direct 
          communication and note the judicious use of string slides from the cellos 
          especially to give the requisite lyricism. "Dorabella" (X) 
          is a skittish little thing contrasting beautifully with a really boisterous 
          Dan the Bulldog in G.R.S (XI). But I have always felt that for Barbirolli 
          the real heart of the work was not "Nimrod" but B.G.N (XII) 
          and "Romanza" (XIII) running together. Basil Nevinson's great 
          cello variation always brought out the best in Barbirolli and he probably 
          rehearsed the section by playing it to them himself. Here it wraps itself 
          around you like a great warm cloak on a freezing cold day. Then there 
          is that seamless transformation into the following variation, "Romanza", 
          recalling a friend half a world away. Here, I think, is the key to the 
          interpretation. 
        
 
        
A couple of years ago I made the pilgrimage to the 
          Elgar Birthplace Museum in Broadheath near Worcester. On a hot summer's 
          afternoon, like many Elgarians before me, I sat on a window cill overlooking 
          the gardens in full bloom. It might have been the turn of the 19th rather 
          than the 20th century. The "Romanza" was playing on the loudspeakers 
          in the house and it reminded me, if I needed it, that Elgar could evoke 
          the pure magic of nostalgic memory like few other composers. Elgar’s 
          contemporary Mahler could do it, of course, but not with the same sense 
          of warmth. Think of all the place names littering Elgar’s scores: Alassio 
          in "In The South", Venice in the Second Symphony, Longdon Marsh in "The 
          Apostles, even a distant memory of the summer wind blowing in pine trees 
          on a country road in childhood conjured up in Gerontius" by Newman's 
          words. Treasured places from the past to unlock the secrets of the heart 
          in the present; memories recollected in tranquillity. So the Enigma 
          Variations are certainly about friendship but, like a lot of Elgar's 
          profoundest music, they are also about the power of memory. Barbirolli's 
          delivery of the "Calm Sea and Prosperous Voyage" clarinet theme across 
          the gentle throb of the timpani-created ship's engine in the "Romanza" 
          shows he knew the value of memory also, and what to do with it. Here 
          is a recording that celebrates this, illustrates it and most especially 
          in that particular variation. Don't ask me quite how Barbirolli does 
          it because I don't really know. It's just one of those things that you 
          feel and which is in the alchemy of the greatest performances among 
          which this is. It just remains to say the finale contains in the closing 
          pages a real concert organ and you have a recording of the Enigma Variations 
          to really treasure. 
        
 
        
The Love Duet from Puccini’s "Madam Butterfly" 
          is placed rather strangely after the end of the Mahler Symphony. Though 
          this might have had something to do with making good use of disc space. 
          Barbirolli was a great opera conductor and yet only made three complete 
          opera recordings. (He should have recorded Wagner’s "Die Meistersinger" 
          in Dresden in 1968 but cancelled after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia 
          and so Von Karajan got the assignment after Barbirolli's death.) "Madam 
          Butterfly" saw Sir John travel to Rome and the land of his forebears 
          to produce a classic version of this much-loved work. I'm pleased the 
          Love Duet begins here a couple of minutes before "Bimba dagli occhi", 
          as this wonderful tenor entry needs to steal up on you to make its 
          best effect. Carlo Bergonzi is an intelligent singer and Renata Scotto 
          one of the great Butterflies and both are well supported by the Rome 
          Opera Orchestra who respond to Barbirolli's inspired direction with 
          passion and power. 
        
 
        
A great memorial to a much-loved conductor that contains 
          a memorable Mahler Second rescued from the archives and that makes it 
          indispensable. 
        
 
        
        
Tony Duggan 
        
        
        
Visit Tony 
          Duggan's Mahler pages