Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
 - Roger Jones and John Quinn
 
 Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
 
 European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
 
 Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
 
 Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
 
 Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
   
SEEN AND HEARD UK 
CONCERT REVIEW
Elgar: Introduction and Allegro, op.47 (1905)
Schumann: Cello Concerto in A minor, OP.129 (1850)
Vaughan Williams: Symphony No.5 in D (1938/1943)
This is the third concert conducted by Vladimir Ashkenazy I have attended within the past year and yet again a fine orchestra has not shown itself to best effect because of uninspiring interpretations and weak leadership. As a pianist Ashkenazy has few peers, but as a conductor, for me, he lacks the very strengths that, as a pianist, he displays in every note he plays.
Elgar's great Introduction and Allegro 
                            was given with the Sacconi Quartet - one of the best 
                            of the younger quartets working at the moment - but 
                            even their participation failed to ignite this 
                            performance. The fault must be laid at the 
                            conductor's door for Ashkenazy didn't seem fully to 
                            understand where the music was going. The 
                            Introduction was uneventful, and once the allegro 
                            started Ashkenazy put his foot on the accelerator at 
                            the point where the quartet starts its chatter in 
                            semiquavers. This should be in the same tempo as 
                            what has preceded it and here it felt rushed - the 
                            same thing happened in the recapitulation. The fugue 
                            started too quickly and Ashkenazy failed to increase 
                            the tempo when it was required, so rather than a 
                            build up of excitement things progressed without the 
                            necessary incident. Also, at the end of the fugue 
                            there is a short passage for the solo cello which 
                            leads back into the allegro, but here it was given 
                            as an end to a section, rather than as a 
                            continuation. At the end the Welsh tune was given in 
                            its full glory but without passion.
                            
                            Raphael Wallfisch played the Schumann 
                            Concerto as if it was a better, and more 
                            important, work than it actually is, and I was 
                            convinced of its qualities, such was our soloist's 
                            advocacy. The orchestration isn't Schumann's best 
                            and there was nothing Ashkenazy or the orchestra 
                            could do to enliven it. The duet between soloist and 
                            principal cello, in the slow movement, was perfectly 
                            achieved.
                            
                            Vaughan Williams's Fifth Symphony 
                            is one of the greatest symphonies of the twentieth 
                            century, and not just by an Englishman. Much of the 
                            music is of an heightened emotional state and it 
                            needs very careful handling to make it speak and 
                            reveal its many secrets. As with his performance of 
                            the Elgar, I felt a lack of control and purpose in 
                            Ashkenazy's interpretation: he didn't really 
                            understand his destination before he started his 
                            journey. Also, as with the Elgar, the music was 
                            given as a series of separate events rather than as 
                            a continuously developing whole. Climaxes were 
                            poorly built, always arriving too quickly rather 
                            than growing out of the texture, and the sense of 
                            awe and wonder, which fill this work, was totally 
                            missing. Barbirolli, Tod Handley and Bryden Thomson 
                            all had the measure of this work, and I had the 
                            pleasure of hearing them all in this work in live 
                            performance; Ashkenazy has a long way to go to reach 
                            the heights of their interpretations. 
                            
                            
                            Bob Briggs 
