Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
 - Roger Jones and John Quinn
 
 Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
 
 European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
 
 Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
 
 Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
 
 Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
   
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Haydn, Beethoven:
   Navarra 
  Quartet: Magnus Johnston, Marije Ploemacher (violins), Simone van der Giessen 
  (viola), Nathaniel Boyd (cello). Reardon Smith Theatre, National Museum, 
  Cardiff 23.1.2011 (GPu)
  
  Haydn, String Quartet in C, Op.54, No.2
Beethoven, String Quartet in E minor, Op.59, No.2 
  
  As has often been noted, Haydn’s opus 54 quartets have about them what was 
  then a new assertiveness, a new demonstrativeness and even flamboyance of 
  manner. This is certainly true of the second of the three quartets that carry 
  the Opus 54 number, the most often played of the three. There is much that is 
  bold in the writing and some of it makes considerable demands on the players’ 
  virtuosity, in music where the first violin often plays a somewhat dominant 
  role. In this performance by the young Navarra Quartet – formed in 2002 at the 
  Royal Northern College of Music and currently Quartet in Association there – 
  there was plenty of energy and propulsive playing. In the opening vivace the 
  work of leader Magnus Johnston was strong, and the ensemble playing was well 
  knit-together, though at moments things felt just a little rushed and in need 
  of a little more space; certainly some of Haydn’s pauses might have been given 
  greater value. Johnston was naturally much to the fore in the C minor adagio, 
  playing the lamenting Ziguener over the hymn-like ground provided by 
  the other voices. By leading straight from this adagio into the minuet, a 
  minuet suggestive of both the ländler and the later waltz, Haydn (not 
  uncharacteristically) teases the listener’s formal expectations, especially 
  when the adagietto echoes the adagio as well as the minuet proper. This is 
  tricky stuff and I am not sure that the Navarra absolutely brought it off on 
  this occasion. Haydn continues to flout mere convention, closing with an 
  enigmatic movement which opens with a simple and calm adagio (in which the 
  cello of Nathaniel Boyd was heard to particularly good effect), before a 
  lively presto enters assertively and appears to have taken over, to have 
  established the movement as the kind of fast movement properly fitted to close 
  a quartet; a fortissimo chord feels as though it is announcing the beginning 
  of a forceful coda, only for the slow opening of the movement to return and 
  for the work to close with a touching delicacy. The Navarra’s account of this 
  movement was intelligent and measured, though a little of its magic eluded 
  them. 
  
  In the second of Beethoven’s three Razumovsky quartets the playing was 
  committed and energetic, though sometimes at the cost of detail. The opening 
  of the allegro, with its two widely spaced chords, carried appropriate 
  authority, but in the many rapidly shifting moods that occupy so much of the 
  movement, transitions and emotional contrasts were not delineated quite as 
  clearly as they might have been. The lengthy adagio was well focussed and 
  shaped and the movement’s progression from an initial innocence and unearthly 
  calm, through a suggestion of the heroic, to a degree of sorrow before closing 
  in what Cobbett, capturing the emotional ambiguity very well, called “a 
  tranquillity which is not that of joy” was well articulated. The Navarra 
  Quartet was at its best in the compelling interpretation of this difficult 
  movement. The opening of the allegretto was nicely pointed, though in the main 
  scherzo-body of the movement their playing sometimes seemed too busily 
  forceful to allow the music’s deep sense of unrest to find expression. The 
  high-spirits of the closing presto were generally well-handled and a 
  pleasantly jaunty manner was achieved and sustained, though this performance 
  didn’t quite have the headlong irresistibility that some quartets have found 
  in the movement.
  
  The Navarra Quartet is already a good ensemble, and this was a concert at 
  which one was very happy to have been present. The two quartets they chose to 
  play on this occasion are both particularly complex and demanding, full of 
  teasing subtleties and subversions of the conventional; I suspect that in a 
  few year’s time the Navarra’s readings of these quartets will be better still 
  – something to look forward to on the evidence of the good things they are 
  already able to offer.
  
  Glyn Pursglove
