Other Links
Editorial Board
- UK Editors
 - Roger Jones and John Quinn
 
 Editors for The Americas - Bruce Hodges and Jonathan Spencer Jones
 
 European Editors - Bettina Mara and Jens F Laurson
 
 Consulting Editor - Bill Kenny
 
 Assistant Webmaster -Stan Metzger
 
 Founder - Len Mullenger
Google Site Search
   
SEEN AND HEARD UK CONCERT REVIEW
Rachmaninov: The Bells, Op. 35
Walton: Symphony No 1 in B flat minor 
        
        'The Bells', Op. 35, was composed by Rachmaninov in 1912-1913. It 
        therefore came after the First and Second symphonies, but before the 
        Third. In many ways it can be considered to be Rachmaninov's Choral 
        Symphony; it has four movements, and calls for a huge orchestra, a 
        choir, and three soloists; soprano, tenor and baritone. The text is 
        Edgar Allan Poe's, 'The Bells', freely translated into Russian by 
        Konstantin Balmont, a prominent Russian poet. It is reputed to have been 
        one of Rachmaninov's favourite compositions. 
        
        This is top-drawer Rachmaninov, showing him to be a true successor to 
        Tchaikovsky, the composer he revered. In other words it is passionate, 
        sometimes sombre, sometimes tortured, and sometimes utterly sublime. The 
        use of the orchestra is brilliantly virtuosic, alive with brilliantly 
        vivid colours, and always sure-footed. Rachmaninov's extraordinary 
        harmonic sense is here in abundance - glowingly chromatic, yet always 
        with a firm sense of direction.
        
        This was a fabulous performance. Bychkov obviously adores the music, and 
        directed the orchestra, choir, and soloists firmly but lovingly. Frank 
        Lopardo sang the first movement, 'Silver Sleigh Bells', with sure 
        intonation and a radiant tone, semi-eclipsed only by the BBC Symphony 
        Chorus, whose contribution was nothing short of breathtaking. Next it 
        was the turn of Viktoria Yastrebova to sing the second movement, 'Mellow 
        Wedding Bells'. The choral writing here is more solemn, and it contrasts 
        with ecstatic music for the solo soprano. As in the previous movement 
        the solo part was superbly performed. 
The third movement, 'Loud alarum Bells', is for chorus and orchestra, 
        and here we're in a different world again, with dark colours and 
        dramatic rhythms. Both chorus and orchestra continued to shine, and then 
        we were plunged into the desolation of the last movement, 'Mournful Iron 
        Bells', sung by David Wilson-Johnson to enormously moving effect. In 
        this final movement the long, sad, cor anglais solo was beautifully 
        played by Alison Teale. Towards the very end, Rachmaninov pulls out a 
        master-stroke, and the music gently transports us into a major key; 
        peace reigns, beyond death. 
        
        I understand that David Wilson-Johnson was a late replacement for the 
        advertised soloist, Vladimir Vaneev. Regrettably, there was no 
        announcement to this effect and I only learned of it by chance during a 
        post-concert conversation with a member of the orchestra.
        
        It was exciting to contemplate Walton's very different First Symphony 
        after all this. Composed between 1931and 1935, it was instantly 
        recognized as a landmark, and it's not hard to see why. In it Walton 
        shows complete mastery of form and manages to be totally original, 
        despite showing strong influences of some other symphonic geniuses, 
        notably Elgar and above all, Sibelius. The first movement, with its 
        virtually ceaseless energy and jagged rhythms rivals Beethoven's 5th 
        in its use of a rhythmic leitmotif - it is extraordinarily 
        concentrated, dramatic and powerful. The second movement is a fast, 
        impatient scherzo, the third a reflective autumnal idyll, and the fourth 
        a bombastic affair, featuring extended fugato sections and a splendidly 
        triumphant coda. 
        
        Walton never found composing an easy business, struggling for months or 
        even years to get things right. He had particularly serious problems 
        with this last movement, so much so that the first performance had to be 
        given with only the first three movements completed. There has been much 
        speculation as to why Walton found it difficult to finish the symphony, 
        which came following a hugely upsetting love affair with Baroness Imma 
        Doernberg. Some say that it was a new love, Alice Wimborne, who enabled 
        the block to be cleared, but in any case it is clear that the first 
        three movements were very difficult to follow. Optimism was needed to 
        counterbalance the storms and stresses particularly apparent in 
        movements one and two, and optimism was in short supply in the 
        economically and politically troubled times of the 1930's. 
        
        In this fabulous music, Bychkov, who has been making a speciality of 
        this symphony, seemed less happy. Although the performance was certainly 
        interesting, with much committed playing from the BBC SO, I felt there 
        were problems with tempi, which sometimes threatened to undermine the 
        symphony's strong design. The all-important dotted rhythms in the first 
        movement began somewhat hesitantly, and there was too much rubato in the 
        later sections. The second movement was taken more slowly than is the 
        norm, and it simply felt too slow. The lyrical third movement fared 
        better, but again I felt the last movement was taken at too leisurely a 
        pace and excitement was lost. For me, this really did not compare with 
        one or two of the excellent performances available on disc, say, by 
        Vernon Handley, Previn, or even those by the composer himself. 
        
        Despite these gripes, this was a terrific concert, and it was gratifying 
        to see the Barbican Hall choc-a-bloc with an audience obviously 
        thrilling to the music. 
        
        Christopher Gunning 
        
        CG writes: 
        As a composer myself, attending 
        concerts is a necessary and lovely part of my life, and  there is 
        nothing quite like the excitement of live music making. Periodically, as 
        with all of us, I’ve been cross, reading 
        reviews of concerts I’ve attended, often disagreeing with the mainstream 
        critics, and frequently feeling that the reviewer failed to convey the 
        essence of the music and of its performance. So it is interesting to 
        have a go at it myself - and the first thing I’ve discovered is that 
        it’s not necessarily easy! What I will aim to do is talk about the 
        composer and the music, and try to judge whether or not the composer 
        would have been content with the performance. 
        
        It’s inevitable that I will view things from the composer’s point of 
        view; I have been writing music for most of my life – mostly scores for 
        films and television, but more recently symphonies and concertos. 
        About my own career - my website can be found at
        
        www.christopher-gunning.co.uk 
        
 
